Clinical Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix (SimpliDerm and AlloDerm Ready-to-Use) in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Brian P Tierney, Mauricio De La Garza, George R Jennings, Adam B Weinfeld
Author Information
  1. Brian P Tierney: Plastic Surgery, Tierney Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nashville, USA.
  2. Mauricio De La Garza: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, DHR Health, McAllen, USA.
  3. George R Jennings: Plastic Surgery, Shoals Plastic Surgery Face and Body, Muscle Shoals, USA.
  4. Adam B Weinfeld: Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas, Austin, USA.

Abstract

Background The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for post-mastectomy reconstruction is considered by many surgeons to be an accepted component of surgical technique. Early clinical experience is described for SimpliDerm® - a novel human ADM (Aziyo Biologics, Silver Spring, USA), and AlloDerm® Ready-To-Use (RTU) - an established ADM (Allergan Medical, Irvine, USA). Methods Records were retrospectively reviewed from four sites between 2016 and 2021 of patients who underwent immediate, two-stage reconstruction with either SimpliDerm (n=38) or AlloDerm RTU (n=69) after mastectomy and were followed out to exchange to permanent implant(s), tissue expander(s) explant, or death. Results Immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders and ADM was performed on 107 patients (181 breasts). Overall mean patient age was 51.4 ± 12.4 years, and mean BMI was 28.0 ± 5.8 kg/m. Significantly more patients in the SimpliDerm group were of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (34.2% vs. 7.2%; P<.001). Reconstructions were predominantly prepectoral (82.3%). A total of 35 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 27 (25.2%) patients, with no difference in AE type, classification, or rates between ADM groups. No AEs were considered related to either ADM. The observed AE profiles and rates are similar to those published for other ADMs in immediate breast reconstruction. Conclusions There continues to be a need for additional clinically equivalent ADMs to provide physicians with more availability and options for their practice. This retrospective, multisite study describes comparable clinical outcomes with SimpliDerm and AlloDerm RTU through a median of 133.5 days (~four months) following immediate two-stage breast reconstruction.

Keywords

References

  1. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Dec 09;3(11):e569 [PMID: 26893994]
  2. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr;45(4):584-590 [PMID: 30683449]
  3. Womens Health Issues. 2014 May-Jun;24(3):e261-9 [PMID: 24794541]
  4. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Jun 08;56(6): [PMID: 32521732]
  5. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jan;74(1):41-47 [PMID: 32893151]
  6. Biomaterials. 2010 Nov;31(33):8626-33 [PMID: 20728934]
  7. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Nov 13;6(11):e2013 [PMID: 30881804]
  8. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;35(1):100-6 [PMID: 21184070]
  9. Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Nov;36(suppl 2):S7-S22 [PMID: 27697888]
  10. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Mar 19;6(3):e1701 [PMID: 29707460]
  11. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul;136(1):10-20 [PMID: 26111310]
  12. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Feb 16;9(2):e3420 [PMID: 33680668]
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):403e-410e [PMID: 22030500]
  14. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 May 18;6(5):e1744 [PMID: 29922548]
  15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Mar;141(3):541-549 [PMID: 29481386]
  16. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jul;79(1):115-123 [PMID: 28509698]
  17. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Aug 10;9(8):e3745 [PMID: 34386310]
  18. Gland Surg. 2019 Feb;8(1):3-10 [PMID: 30842922]
  19. JAMA Surg. 2021 Sep 1;156(9):847-855 [PMID: 34160601]
  20. Curr Oncol. 2020 Dec 25;28(1):184-195 [PMID: 33704185]
  21. Eplasty. 2016 Aug 11;16:e23 [PMID: 27602176]
  22. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jan 25;5(1):e1209 [PMID: 28203509]
  23. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):514-524 [PMID: 21285756]
  24. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(6):S116-20 [PMID: 24374398]
  25. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 May;70(5):568-576 [PMID: 28341592]
  26. Ann Plast Surg. 2018 May;80(5S Suppl 5):S292-S294 [PMID: 29489547]
  27. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 20;8(3):e2690 [PMID: 32537347]
  28. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Jul 12;: [PMID: 34254268]
  29. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jun 16;9(6):e3648 [PMID: 34150429]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ADMreconstructionbreastpatientsSimpliDermmatrixRTUimmediateAlloDerm2%acellulardermalconsideredclinical-USAtwo-stageeitherstissueImmediatemean4±5AEsAEratesADMsBackgroundusepost-mastectomymanysurgeonsacceptedcomponentsurgicaltechniqueEarlyexperiencedescribedSimpliDerm®novelhumanAziyoBiologicsSilverSpringAlloDerm®Ready-To-UseestablishedAllerganMedicalIrvineMethodsRecordsretrospectivelyreviewedfoursites20162021underwentn=38n=69mastectomyfollowedexchangepermanentimplantexpanderexplantdeathResultsexpandersperformed107181breastsOverallpatientage5112yearsBMI2808kg/mSignificantlygroupHispanicLatinoethnicity34vs7P<001Reconstructionspredominantlyprepectoral823%total35adverseeventsoccurred2725differencetypeclassificationgroupsrelatedobservedprofilessimilarpublishedConclusionscontinuesneedadditionalclinicallyequivalentprovidephysiciansavailabilityoptionspracticeretrospectivemultisitestudydescribescomparableoutcomesmedian133days~fourmonthsfollowingClinicalOutcomesAcellularDermalMatrixReady-to-UseBreastReconstructionadmallodermcancercomplicationsextracellularinteguplyplasticreconstructivesurgerysimpliderm

Similar Articles

Cited By