High-Level Executive Functions: A Possible Role of Sex and Weight Condition in Planning and Decision-Making Performances.

Francesca Favieri, Giuseppe Forte, Mariella Pazzaglia, Eunice Y Chen, Maria Casagrande
Author Information
  1. Francesca Favieri: Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Rome "Sapienza", Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy. ORCID
  2. Giuseppe Forte: Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Rome "Sapienza", Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy. ORCID
  3. Mariella Pazzaglia: Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Rome "Sapienza", Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy. ORCID
  4. Eunice Y Chen: Department of Psychology, Temple University, Weiss Hall 1701 N 13th St, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA. ORCID
  5. Maria Casagrande: Dipartimento di Psicologia Dinamica, Clinica e Salute, Università di Rome "Sapienza", Via Degli Apuli 1, 00185 Rome, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

Evidence indicates an association between executive functioning and increased weight, with different patterns ascribed to individual differences (sex, age, lifestyles). This study reports on the relationship between high-level executive functions and body weight. Sixty-five young adults participated in the study: 29 participants (14 males, 15 females) in the normal weight range; 36 participants (18 males, 18 females) in the overweight range. The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and Tower of London Task were administered to assess decision making and planning. Planning did not differ in individuals in the normal-weight and overweight groups, and no difference emerged between females and males. However, normal and overweight males and females had different patterns in decision making. On the long-term consequences index of the IGT, females reported lower scores than males. Males in the overweight range had a lower long-term consequences index on the IGT than normal-weight males, while this pattern did not emerge in females. These findings suggest that decision-making responses may differ in the overweight relative to healthy weight condition, with a different expression in males and females. This pattern should be considered in weight loss prevention strategies, possibly adopting different approaches in males and females.

Keywords

References

  1. Obes Rev. 2001 Nov;2(4):219-29 [PMID: 12119993]
  2. Obes Sci Pract. 2016 Dec;2(4):334-340 [PMID: 28090338]
  3. Physiol Behav. 2017 Nov 1;181:69-74 [PMID: 28893663]
  4. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Jun 25;298(1089):199-209 [PMID: 6125971]
  5. Cognition. 1994 Apr-Jun;50(1-3):7-15 [PMID: 8039375]
  6. Behav Neurosci. 2016 Feb;130(1):50-61 [PMID: 26653713]
  7. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015 Oct 15;14:79 [PMID: 26491649]
  8. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2012 Jan;20(1):e56-62 [PMID: 21308871]
  9. Eat Weight Disord. 2017 Sep;22(3):435-444 [PMID: 27744608]
  10. J Affect Disord. 2000 Dec;61(3):201-16 [PMID: 11163422]
  11. Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 15;11(2): [PMID: 33672004]
  12. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009 Nov;34(10):1449-58 [PMID: 19497677]
  13. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995 Dec 15;769:241-51 [PMID: 8595029]
  14. Eat Weight Disord. 2006 Sep;11(3):126-32 [PMID: 17075239]
  15. Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 20;10:2126 [PMID: 31616340]
  16. Neuropsychol Rev. 2013 Jun;23(2):138-56 [PMID: 23381140]
  17. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Apr;38(4):547-51 [PMID: 24335763]
  18. Curr Obes Rep. 2021 Dec;10(4):458-466 [PMID: 34599745]
  19. Int J Obes (Lond). 2010 Mar;34(3):407-19 [PMID: 19997072]
  20. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Jan;84:225-244 [PMID: 29203421]
  21. Physiol Behav. 2018 Mar 15;186:25-30 [PMID: 29326031]
  22. Obes Rev. 2017 Aug;18(8):936-942 [PMID: 28429468]
  23. Eat Weight Disord. 2020 Oct;25(5):1333-1345 [PMID: 31473988]
  24. Nutrients. 2020 Feb 14;12(2): [PMID: 32075079]
  25. Nutrients. 2020 Jun 30;12(7): [PMID: 32629783]
  26. Exp Ther Med. 2016 Oct;12(4):2395-2399 [PMID: 27703502]
  27. Nutrients. 2021 Apr 02;13(4): [PMID: 33918236]
  28. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 May;19(5):1083-9 [PMID: 21372804]
  29. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jun;79(3):372-7 [PMID: 20399590]
  30. Obes Rev. 2017 Jun;18(6):687-699 [PMID: 28371180]
  31. Appetite. 2007 Jan;48(1):12-9 [PMID: 16875757]
  32. J Neurosci Methods. 2014 Jan 30;222:250-9 [PMID: 24269254]
  33. Behav Brain Res. 2010 Jan 20;206(2):177-83 [PMID: 19761799]
  34. Brain. 2000 Nov;123 ( Pt 11):2189-202 [PMID: 11050020]
  35. Front Neurosci. 2014 Nov 05;8:352 [PMID: 25414632]
  36. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43382 [PMID: 22927962]
  37. Appetite. 2018 May 1;124:4-9 [PMID: 28551113]
  38. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Nov 15;: [PMID: 34780011]
  39. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Oct 17;13:369 [PMID: 31680919]
  40. Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Mar;64(620):e122-7 [PMID: 24567650]
  41. J Pediatr. 2008 Feb;152(2):207-13 [PMID: 18206690]
  42. Front Nutr. 2017 Oct 31;4:51 [PMID: 29164126]
  43. Respirology. 2012 Jan;17(1):43-9 [PMID: 22040049]
  44. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 03;11(6):e0155600 [PMID: 27257888]
  45. Compr Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Feb;48(1):57-61 [PMID: 17145283]
  46. Child Obes. 2017 Jun;13(3):190-196 [PMID: 28256922]
  47. Appetite. 2018 May 1;124:43-49 [PMID: 28323058]
  48. J Psychosom Res. 2011 Feb;70(2):189-96 [PMID: 21262422]
  49. Health Promot Perspect. 2013 Jun 30;3(1):11-22 [PMID: 24688948]

Grants

  1. RF-2018-12365682/Ministry of Health

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0malesfemalesweightoverweightdifferentexecutiverangeIGTdecisionmakingpatternsdifferencesfunctionsparticipantsnormal18TaskplanningPlanningdiffernormal-weightlong-termconsequencesindexlowerpatternconditionEvidenceindicatesassociationfunctioningincreasedascribedindividualsexagelifestylesstudyreportsrelationshiphigh-levelbodySixty-fiveyoungadultsparticipatedstudy:29141536IowaGamblingTowerLondonadministeredassessindividualsgroupsdifferenceemergedHoweverreportedscoresMalesemergefindingssuggestdecision-makingresponsesmayrelativehealthyexpressionconsideredlosspreventionstrategiespossiblyadoptingapproachesHigh-LevelExecutiveFunctions:PossibleRoleSexWeightConditionDecision-MakingPerformancesgender

Similar Articles

Cited By