Socioeconomic Determinants of Universal Health Coverage in the Asian Region.

Tomoyuki Takura, Hiroko Miura
Author Information
  1. Tomoyuki Takura: Department of Healthcare Economics and Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan.
  2. Hiroko Miura: Division of Disease Control and Epidemiology, School of Dentistry, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Ishikari 061-0293, Japan.

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) states that examining medical financial systems is the most important process in evaluating universal health coverage (UHC). This study used the service coverage index (SCI) as a proxy of the progress toward UHC in eleven Asian countries. We employed a fixed-effects regression model to analyze panel data from 2015 to 2017, to explain the interrelationship between the SCI and major socioeconomic indicators. We also conducted a performance analysis (ratio of achieved SCI level to gross domestic product (GDP) or health expenditure displacement) to examine the balance between the degree of achievements related to UHC and a country's economic level. The results showed that GDP and health expenditure were significantly positively correlated with the SCI ( < 0.01). The panel data analysis results showed that GDP per capita was a factor that greatly influenced the SCI as well as poverty (partial regression coefficient: 0.0017, 95% CI: 0.0013-0.0021). The results of the performance analysis showed that the Philippines had the highest scores (GDP: 1.84 SCI score/USD per capita, health expenditure: 1.04 SCI score/USD per capita) and South Korea the lowest. We conclude that socioeconomic factors, such as GDP, health expenditure, unemployment, poverty, and population influence the progress of UHC, regardless of system maturity or geographic characteristics.

Keywords

References

  1. BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Nov 1;4(6):e001843 [PMID: 31798996]
  2. Health Policy Plan. 2019 Oct 1;34(Supplement_1):i38-i46 [PMID: 31644797]
  3. World Health Popul. 2007 Apr;9(2):95-113 [PMID: 18270509]
  4. Value Health. 2020 Oct;23(10):1300-1306 [PMID: 33032773]
  5. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Aug;40(8):1234-1242 [PMID: 34339254]
  6. Glob Health Action. 2014 Dec 03;7:25856 [PMID: 25476931]
  7. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;26(2):105-9 [PMID: 25092958]
  8. Health Policy Plan. 2017 Feb;32(1):43-56 [PMID: 27497138]
  9. Int J Health Econ Manag. 2016 Jun;16(2):133-161 [PMID: 27878714]
  10. Aust J Prim Health. 2020 Oct;26(5):351-357 [PMID: 32746962]
  11. Intern Med. 2018 May 1;57(9):1191-1200 [PMID: 29279514]
  12. Gerontologist. 2019 May 17;59(3):401-410 [PMID: 30517628]
  13. Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(8):1102-1110 [PMID: 28575415]
  14. Tunis Med. 2018 Oct-Nov;96(10-11):789-807 [PMID: 30746672]
  15. Lancet. 2016 Feb 20;387(10020):811-6 [PMID: 26299185]
  16. Environ Health Prev Med. 2015 Sep;20(5):379-87 [PMID: 26194451]
  17. Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1783-1798 [PMID: 29678341]
  18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 03;18(4): [PMID: 33546157]
  19. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(4):352-359 [PMID: 29986782]
  20. Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;8:80 [PMID: 32296671]
  21. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):126 [PMID: 33731081]
  22. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8): [PMID: 32847825]
  23. Pediatr Radiol. 2011 Oct;41(10):1259-65 [PMID: 21607600]

MeSH Term

Gross Domestic Product
Health Expenditures
Socioeconomic Factors
Universal Health Insurance
World Health Organization

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthSCIcoverageUHCanalysisGDPexpenditurepaneldataperformanceresultsshowed0percapitapovertyHealthuniversalserviceindexprogressAsianregressionsocioeconomiclevelgrossdomesticproduct1score/USDpopulationWorldOrganizationWHOstatesexaminingmedicalfinancialsystemsimportantprocessevaluatingstudyusedproxytowardelevencountriesemployedfixed-effectsmodelanalyze20152017explaininterrelationshipmajorindicatorsalsoconductedratioachieveddisplacementexaminebalancedegreeachievementsrelatedcountry'seconomicsignificantlypositivelycorrelated<01factorgreatlyinfluencedwellpartialcoefficient:001795%CI:0013-00021PhilippineshighestscoresGDP:84expenditure:04SouthKorealowestconcludefactorsunemploymentinfluenceregardlesssystemmaturitygeographiccharacteristicsSocioeconomicDeterminantsUniversalCoverageRegion

Similar Articles

Cited By