Stress eating: an online survey of eating behaviours, comfort foods, and healthy food substitutes in German adults.

Kathrin Gemesi, Sophie Laura Holzmann, Birgit Kaiser, Monika Wintergerst, Martin Lurz, Georg Groh, Markus Böhm, Helmut Krcmar, Kurt Gedrich, Hans Hauner, Christina Holzapfel
Author Information
  1. Kathrin Gemesi: Institute for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.
  2. Sophie Laura Holzmann: Institute for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.
  3. Birgit Kaiser: Research Group Public Health Nutrition, ZIEL - Institute for Food & Health, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
  4. Monika Wintergerst: Research Group Social Computing, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
  5. Martin Lurz: Krcmar Lab, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
  6. Georg Groh: Research Group Social Computing, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
  7. Markus Böhm: Krcmar Lab, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
  8. Helmut Krcmar: Krcmar Lab, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
  9. Kurt Gedrich: Research Group Public Health Nutrition, ZIEL - Institute for Food & Health, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
  10. Hans Hauner: Institute for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.
  11. Christina Holzapfel: Institute for Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany. christina.holzapfel@tum.de.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In many people, stress is associated with changes in eating behaviour. Food products consumed during stress (comfort foods) are often unhealthy. It is rather unknown what comfort foods are consumed in Germany and what healthier food products are considered as alternatives to support stress-eaters in making healthier food choices.
METHODS: This online survey was conducted in spring 2021 throughout Germany. Participants were digitally recruited by newsletters, homepages, social media, and mailing lists. The survey included a standardized questionnaire with items concerning e.g. sociodemography, stress, and nutrition. comfort foods were pre-selected through literature search and food substitutes were defined and discussed by experts. Analyses examined comfort food consumption and substitute preferences dependent on sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and being a self-identified stress-eater. The statistical analysis was performed using R.
RESULTS: Survey Participants were mostly female (80.6%, 994/1234), had a mean age of 31.4 ± 12.8 years and a mean BMI of 23.4 ± 4.3 kg/m. Participants stated, that the two favourite comfort foods were chocolate (consumed often/very often by 48.3%, 596/1234) and coffee (consumed often/very often by 45.9%, 566/1234). Regarding food substitutes, the most frequently named alternative food for chocolate and cookies was fresh fruits (for chocolate: 74.4%, 815/1096, for cookies: 62.6%, 565/902). Tea without added sugar (64.4%, 541/840) was the preferred substitute for coffee. Almost 50% of Participants (48.1%, 594/1234) identified themselves as stress-eaters, of which 68.9% (408/592) stated to eat (very) often more than usual in subjective stress situations.
CONCLUSIONS: The results from this work suggest that specific comfort foods and substitutes are preferred by the Participants in stressful situations. This knowledge about food choices and substitutes should be investigated in further studies to improve eating behaviour in stressful situations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The survey was registered in the German Register of Clinical Studies (Registration number: DRKS00023984 ).

Keywords

References

  1. Health Psychol. 2014 Dec;33(12):1552-7 [PMID: 25133833]
  2. Appetite. 1997 Feb;28(1):7-18 [PMID: 9134091]
  3. Eat Behav. 2016 Aug;22:211-216 [PMID: 27310611]
  4. BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):100 [PMID: 35031050]
  5. Appetite. 2013 Oct;69:151-5 [PMID: 23747576]
  6. Physiol Behav. 1999 May;66(3):511-5 [PMID: 10357442]
  7. Eat Behav. 2016 Dec;23:76-81 [PMID: 27565374]
  8. Nutrition. 2007 Nov-Dec;23(11-12):887-94 [PMID: 17869482]
  9. Prev Med. 2002 Jan;34(1):29-39 [PMID: 11749094]
  10. Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105215 [PMID: 33774134]
  11. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Jan;17(1):72-7 [PMID: 18997672]
  12. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 May;56(5-6):749-54 [PMID: 23703494]
  13. Nutr J. 2015 Dec 03;14:122 [PMID: 26630944]
  14. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Feb 28;13:211-221 [PMID: 32184682]
  15. Physiol Behav. 2006 Apr 15;87(4):789-93 [PMID: 16519909]
  16. Nutrients. 2020 Apr 27;12(5): [PMID: 32349338]
  17. Physiol Behav. 2005 Nov 15;86(4):559-67 [PMID: 16209880]
  18. Eat Behav. 2015 Apr;17:74-6 [PMID: 25615911]
  19. Nutr J. 2020 Aug 28;19(1):92 [PMID: 32859204]
  20. Br J Nutr. 2016 Jun;115(12):2252-63 [PMID: 27185414]
  21. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:703-718 [PMID: 29927688]
  22. Physiol Behav. 2007 Jul 24;91(4):449-58 [PMID: 17543357]
  23. Nutr J. 2009 Jul 15;8:31 [PMID: 19604384]
  24. Psychosom Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;62(6):853-65 [PMID: 11139006]
  25. Physiol Behav. 2019 Oct 15;210:112639 [PMID: 31377311]
  26. Front Nutr. 2021 Mar 08;8:635859 [PMID: 33763443]
  27. Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(5):912-920 [PMID: 28655176]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Coffee
Eating
Feeding Behavior
Female
Food Preferences
Fruit
Humans
Male
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult

Chemicals

Coffee

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodcomfortfoodssubstitutesstressconsumedoftensurveyeatingparticipantssituationsbehaviourproductsGermanyhealthierstress-eaterschoicesonlineParticipantssubstituteageBMI6%meanstatedchocolateoften/very48coffee9%4%preferredstressfulGermanStressBACKGROUND:manypeopleassociatedchangesFoodunhealthyratherunknownconsideredalternativessupportmakingMETHODS:conductedspring2021throughoutdigitallyrecruitednewslettershomepagessocialmediamailinglistsincludedstandardizedquestionnaireitemsconcerningegsociodemographynutritionComfortpre-selectedliteraturesearchdefineddiscussedexpertsAnalysesexaminedconsumptionpreferencesdependentsexbodymassindexself-identifiedstress-eaterstatisticalanalysisperformedusingRRESULTS:Surveymostlyfemale80994/1234314 ± 128 years234 ± 43 kg/mtwofavourite3%596/123445566/1234Regardingfrequentlynamedalternativecookiesfreshfruitschocolate:74815/1096cookies:62565/902Teawithoutaddedsugar64541/840Almost50%1%594/1234identified68408/592eatusualsubjectiveCONCLUSIONS:resultsworksuggestspecificknowledgeinvestigatedstudiesimproveTRIALREGISTRATION:registeredRegisterClinicalStudiesRegistrationnumber:DRKS00023984eating:behaviourshealthyadultsChocolateCoffeeNutritionObesity

Similar Articles

Cited By