Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review.

Ashley Kim, Karen C Chung, Christopher Keir, Donald L Patrick
Author Information
  1. Ashley Kim: GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc., CA, Menlo Park, USA. akim@grailbio.com.
  2. Karen C Chung: GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc., CA, Menlo Park, USA.
  3. Christopher Keir: GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc., CA, Menlo Park, USA.
  4. Donald L Patrick: University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multi-cancer early detection tests have been developed to enable earlier detection of multiple cancer types through screening. As reflected by patient-reported outcomes (PROs), the psychosocial impact of cancer screening is not yet clear. Our aim is to evaluate the impact of cancer screening through PRO assessment.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists of articles from January 2000 to August 2020 for relevant publications assessing the psychosocial impact of cancer screening before and within 1 year after screening in the general asymptomatic population, including following receipt of results. Studies focused on diagnostic evaluation or involving patients previously diagnosed with cancer were excluded.
RESULTS: In total, 31 studies (12 randomized controlled trials; 19 observational studies) were included, reflecting PRO assessments associated with lung, breast, colorectal, anal, ovarian, cervical, and prostate cancer screening procedures. The most commonly assessed construct was symptoms of Anxiety, using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. cancer-specific distress and worry were also assessed using a broad range of measures. Overall, individuals tolerated screening procedures well with no major psychosocial effects. Of note, increases in symptoms of Anxiety and levels of distress and worry were generally found prior to communication of screening results and following communication of indeterminate or positive results that required further testing. These negative psychosocial effects were, however, not long-lasting and returned to baseline relatively soon after screening. Furthermore, individuals with higher cancer risk, such as current smokers and those with a family history of cancer, tended to have higher levels of Anxiety and distress throughout the screening process, including following negative or indeterminate results.
CONCLUSIONS: The psychosocial impact of cancer screening is relatively low overall and short-lived, even following false-positive test results. Individuals with a higher risk of cancer tend to experience more symptoms of Anxiety and distress during the screening process; thus, more attention to this group is recommended.

Keywords

References

  1. Lung Cancer. 2008 Dec;62(3):385-90 [PMID: 18468717]
  2. Cancer. 2017 Oct 15;123(20):3882-3894 [PMID: 28833054]
  3. Cancer. 2008 Jul 15;113(2):396-404 [PMID: 18484588]
  4. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96 [PMID: 26757170]
  5. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Aug 01;1:29 [PMID: 12914662]
  6. Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2021 Aug 16;12:81-92 [PMID: 34429674]
  7. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 18;4:82 [PMID: 17044941]
  8. BMJ Open. 2012 Mar 01;2(2):e000663 [PMID: 22382119]
  9. Urology. 2002 Jun;59(6):901-6 [PMID: 12031378]
  10. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 4;160(5):330-8 [PMID: 24378917]
  11. Br J Cancer. 2010 Jan 5;102(1):27-34 [PMID: 19935789]
  12. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 21;22(43):9631-9641 [PMID: 27920484]
  13. Psychooncology. 2013 Mar;22(3):614-20 [PMID: 22290831]
  14. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49(4):413-8 [PMID: 7650466]
  15. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Mar;54(3):352-9 [PMID: 21304309]
  16. J Med Screen. 2012 Dec;19(4):171-6 [PMID: 23486697]
  17. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jan;23(1):154-9 [PMID: 24220914]
  18. Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 31;112 Suppl 1:S108-15 [PMID: 25734389]
  19. Lancet. 2007 Nov 24;370(9601):1764-72 [PMID: 17919718]
  20. Acta Oncol. 2013 Nov;52(8):1615-21 [PMID: 23786174]
  21. Sex Transm Infect. 2020 May;96(3):177-183 [PMID: 31371447]
  22. Cancer. 2010 Feb 1;116(3):544-73 [PMID: 19998273]
  23. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jul 21;96(14):1083-94 [PMID: 15265970]
  24. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):279-84 [PMID: 17587321]
  25. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S467-72 [PMID: 22588767]
  26. J Med Screen. 2002;9(1):7-10 [PMID: 11943790]
  27. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 14;21(26):7933-43 [PMID: 26185366]
  28. Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:96-105 [PMID: 27687535]
  29. Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1873 [PMID: 21130273]
  30. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;5(9):805-806 [PMID: 32738939]
  31. Psychooncology. 2005 Nov;14(11):917-38 [PMID: 15786514]
  32. Thorax. 2016 Nov;71(11):996-1005 [PMID: 27471048]
  33. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30 [PMID: 31912902]
  34. Am J Med. 2004 Nov 15;117(10):719-25 [PMID: 15541320]
  35. Colorectal Dis. 2006 Nov;8(9):781-4 [PMID: 17032325]
  36. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Feb;28(2):292-8 [PMID: 23054920]
  37. Med Decis Making. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):917-25 [PMID: 18725404]
  38. BJOG. 2012 Jul;119(8):936-44 [PMID: 22568482]
  39. Cancer Nurs. 2012 Sep-Oct;35(5):E26-34 [PMID: 22067696]
  40. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70 [PMID: 6880820]
  41. Health Econ. 1993 Oct;2(3):237-46 [PMID: 8275169]
  42. Nature. 2019 Jun;570(7761):385-389 [PMID: 31142840]
  43. Ann Oncol. 2020 Jun;31(6):745-759 [PMID: 33506766]
  44. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):405-13 [PMID: 21795009]
  45. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Aug 21;10:99 [PMID: 22917219]
  46. N Z Med J. 2005 Feb 11;118(1209):U1299 [PMID: 15711632]
  47. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jul;84(1):18-28 [PMID: 26940296]
  48. J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Jul;9(7):927-934 [PMID: 24922011]
  49. Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):209-18 [PMID: 472086]
  50. Cancer. 2014 Nov 1;120(21):3401-9 [PMID: 25065710]
  51. Br J Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;114(5):497-504 [PMID: 26867161]
  52. JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913 [PMID: 29801017]
  53. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb;144(2):363-368 [PMID: 27986270]
  54. JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575 [PMID: 27304597]
  55. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jan 08;5:3 [PMID: 17210071]
  56. Psychooncology. 2003 Jun;12(4):305-18 [PMID: 12748969]
  57. Cancers (Basel). 2019 Dec 04;11(12): [PMID: 31817212]
  58. Science. 2020 Jul 3;369(6499): [PMID: 32345712]
  59. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 8;11(1):103 [PMID: 33420275]
  60. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Sep 1;25(25):3823-30 [PMID: 17761970]
  61. J Med Screen. 2016 Jun;23(2):70-6 [PMID: 26462726]
  62. JAMA. 2013 Feb 27;309(8):814-22 [PMID: 23443445]
  63. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79 [PMID: 17034633]
  64. Soc Sci Med. 1992 May;34(10):1129-34 [PMID: 1641674]
  65. Eur Respir J. 2011 Jul;38(1):154-61 [PMID: 21148229]
  66. JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):674-686 [PMID: 30140884]
  67. BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e024719 [PMID: 30659040]
  68. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Sep;21(9):1165-1172 [PMID: 32800099]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Anxiety
Depression
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
Observational Studies as Topic
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Stress, Psychological

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0screeningcancerpsychosocialresultsimpactfollowinganxietydistressoutcomesusingsymptomshigherPatient-reporteddetectionPROsystematicreviewincludingstudiestrialsassociatedproceduresassessedworrymeasuresindividualseffectslevelscommunicationindeterminatenegativerelativelyriskprocessBACKGROUND:Multi-cancerearlytestsdevelopedenableearliermultipletypesreflectedpatient-reportedPROsyetclearaimevaluateassessmentMETHODS:conductedMEDLINEEMBASEreferencelistsarticlesJanuary2000August2020relevantpublicationsassessingwithin1yeargeneralasymptomaticpopulationreceiptStudiesfocuseddiagnosticevaluationinvolvingpatientspreviouslydiagnosedexcludedRESULTS:total3112randomizedcontrolled19observationalincludedreflectingassessmentslungbreastcolorectalanalovariancervicalprostatecommonlyconstructState-TraitAnxietyInventoryCancer-specificalsobroadrangeOveralltoleratedwellmajornoteincreasesgenerallyfoundpriorpositiverequiredtestinghoweverlong-lastingreturnedbaselinesoonFurthermorecurrentsmokersfamilyhistorytendedthroughoutCONCLUSIONS:lowoverallshort-livedevenfalse-positivetestIndividualstendexperiencethusattentiongrouprecommendedscreening:CancerClinicaloutcome

Similar Articles

Cited By (17)