A modified version of the interlocking finger test as a bedside screening test for visuospatial deficits and dementia in Parkinson's disease.

Nele Schmidt, Tim Strohmaier, Karsten Witt
Author Information
  1. Nele Schmidt: Department of Neurology, University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany. ORCID
  2. Tim Strohmaier: Förde Praxis, Schönberger Straße 166, Kiel, Germany.
  3. Karsten Witt: Department of Neurology, University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Objective of this study was to examine if the Interlocking Finger Test (ILFT) is a suitable bedside screening test for visuospatial functions and/or dementia in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients aiming to facilitate the diagnosis of a dementia syndrome associated with posterior cortical and temporal lobe dysfunction according to the dual syndrome hypothesis (frontostriatal vs. posterior cortical cognitive impairment).
METHODS: Forty-seven PD patients were assessed with the ILFT and an extensive cognitive test battery. The ILFT was carried out in the original version as well as in three modified versions of the test including a fifth figure and/or a more complex rating system, leading to four different ILFT scores (named after the maximum achievable scoring result: ILFT 4, ILFT 5, ILFT 12, and ILFT 15). We conducted a correlation analysis to reveal associations between the ILFT scores and cognitive as well as motor impairments. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses were calculated to evaluate the ability of the ILFT scores to predict visuospatial impairments and dementia.
RESULTS: ILFT scores correlated significantly with global cognition, visuospatial functions, memory, attention, and age (p < .0125) but not with executive functions, language, education, depression, and motor impairment. The ROC analyses revealed ILFT 15 as best predictor for visuospatial deficits and dementia with an area under the curve of .82 and .88, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The ILFT is suitable for detecting symptoms of the posterior cortical degeneration syndrome according to the dual syndrome hypothesis. We recommend the use of the modified test version ILFT 15.

Keywords

References

  1. Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5 [PMID: 15405679]
  2. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jul;29:145-8 [PMID: 26960261]
  3. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;74(4):530-2 [PMID: 12640084]
  4. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 Nov;13(6):920-32 [PMID: 17942010]
  5. Mov Disord. 2020 Jan;35(1):45-54 [PMID: 31743500]
  6. Mov Disord. 2005 Oct;20(10):1255-63 [PMID: 16041803]
  7. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Mar;55(3):181-4 [PMID: 1564476]
  8. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2008;14(2):93-101 [PMID: 17707678]
  9. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2010 Jan;40(1):61-7 [PMID: 20012495]
  10. Mov Disord. 2007 Sep 15;22(12):1689-707; quiz 1837 [PMID: 17542011]
  11. Brain Behav. 2022 Apr;12(4):e2516 [PMID: 35257517]
  12. Neurology. 2010 Sep 21;75(12):1062-9 [PMID: 20855849]
  13. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019 Mar;60:32-42 [PMID: 30361136]
  14. Brain. 2009 Nov;132(Pt 11):2958-69 [PMID: 19812213]
  15. J Parkinsons Dis. 2020;10(4):1807-1816 [PMID: 33016894]
  16. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 [PMID: 1202204]
  17. Mov Disord. 2010 Nov 15;25(15):2649-53 [PMID: 21069833]
  18. Brain. 2007 Jul;130(Pt 7):1787-98 [PMID: 17535834]
  19. Neurology. 2005 Oct 25;65(8):1239-45 [PMID: 16247051]
  20. Neurology. 1989 Sep;39(9):1159-65 [PMID: 2771064]
  21. Neurodegener Dis. 2013;11(2):79-92 [PMID: 23038420]
  22. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014 Apr;20(4):394-9 [PMID: 24495708]
  23. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(1):53-59 [PMID: 28222504]
  24. Cortex. 1976 Dec;12(4):313-24 [PMID: 1009768]

MeSH Term

Cognitive Dysfunction
Dementia
Executive Function
Humans
Neuropsychological Tests
Parkinson Disease

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ILFTtestdementiavisuospatialsyndromeParkinson'sdiseasescoresscreeningfunctionsposteriorcorticaldualhypothesiscognitiveversionmodified15InterlockingFingerTestsuitablebedsideand/orPDpatientsaccordingimpairmentwellmotorimpairmentscurveROCanalysesdeficitsINTRODUCTION:ObjectivestudyexamineaimingfacilitatediagnosisassociatedtemporallobedysfunctionfrontostriatalvsMETHODS:Forty-sevenassessedextensivebatterycarriedoriginalthreeversionsincludingfifthfigurecomplexratingsystemleadingfourdifferentnamedmaximumachievablescoringresult:4512conductedcorrelationanalysisrevealassociationsReceiveroperatingcalculatedevaluateabilitypredictRESULTS:correlatedsignificantlyglobalcognitionmemoryattentionagep <0125executivelanguageeducationdepressionrevealedbestpredictorarea8288respectivelyCONCLUSION:detectingsymptomsdegenerationrecommenduseinterlockingfinger

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)