Chronological age range estimation of cervical vertebral maturation using Baccetti method: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maria Inês Magalhães, Vanessa Machado, Paulo Mascarenhas, João Botelho, José João Mendes, Ana Sintra Delgado
Author Information
  1. Maria Inês Magalhães: Clinical Research Unit (CRU), Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Egas Moniz-Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, Caparica, Almada, Portugal.
  2. Vanessa Machado: Clinical Research Unit (CRU), Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Egas Moniz-Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, Caparica, Almada, Portugal. ORCID
  3. Paulo Mascarenhas: Evidence-Based Hub, CiiEM, Egas Moniz-Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, Caparica, Almada, Portugal. ORCID
  4. João Botelho: Clinical Research Unit (CRU), Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Egas Moniz-Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, Caparica, Almada, Portugal. ORCID
  5. José João Mendes: Clinical Research Unit (CRU), Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Egas Moniz-Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, Caparica, Almada, Portugal. ORCID
  6. Ana Sintra Delgado: Clinical Research Unit (CRU), Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Egas Moniz-Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, Caparica, Almada, Portugal. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The timing of growth is a key factor for correct orthodontic treatment planning. Cervical vertebrae maturation (CVM) is no exception, although the reported chronological ages vary in the literature.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to estimate the average chronological age for each Baccetti's CVM staging.
SEARCH METHODS: Search on MEDLINE-PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was conducted until July 2021. The review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Observational or interventional studies reporting chronological age classified through Baccetti's CVM method were included.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Methodological quality was assessed, and pooled estimates were carried out through random-effects meta-analysis of single means. The impact of sex and continent were also investigated through subgroup analyses.
RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included (9867 participants, 4151 men, and 5716 women). The average chronological age was 9.7 years old (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.4 to 10.1) in CS1, 10.8 years old (95% CI: 10.5 to 11.1) in CS2, 12.0 years old (95% CI: 11.7 to 12.2) in CS3, 13.4 years old (95% CI: 13.2 to 13.6) in CS4, 14.7 years old (95% CI: 14.4 to 15.1) in CS5, and 15.8 years old (95% CI: 15.3 to 16.3) in CS6. A significant difference was found between the sexes in all CVM stages. We also found significant differences across continents.
CONCLUSIONS: For each CVM staging a chronological age range was successfully estimated. Girls presented an earlier skeletal maturation compared to boys. The skeletal maturation differs also according to continents, except for CMV stage 1, pointing to the need for personalized ranges according to each region.
REGISTRATION: Registration number: PROSPERO: CRD42021225422.

References

  1. BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jan 25;12(1):61 [PMID: 30683149]
  2. Prog Orthod. 2006;7(2):176-88 [PMID: 17143345]
  3. Angle Orthod. 2010 Jan;80(1):54-7 [PMID: 19852640]
  4. Horm Res. 1991;36(3-4):131-5 [PMID: 1818008]
  5. Angle Orthod. 1997;67(1):55-66 [PMID: 9046400]
  6. J World Fed Orthod. 2020 Dec;9(4):146-154 [PMID: 33162355]
  7. Arch Dis Child. 2020 Jul;105(7):631-638 [PMID: 31974297]
  8. Hum Biol. 1973 May;45(2):211-27 [PMID: 4714564]
  9. Ann Hum Biol. 1976 Sep;3(5):411-21 [PMID: 984727]
  10. Front Genet. 2019 Mar 26;10:263 [PMID: 30972107]
  11. Clin Chem. 2003 Jan;49(1):7-18 [PMID: 12507954]
  12. Angle Orthod. 2018 Mar;88(2):133-143 [PMID: 29337631]
  13. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Dec;24 Suppl 2:76-83 [PMID: 33232582]
  14. Food Nutr Bull. 2006 Dec;27(4 Suppl Growth Standard):S244-56 [PMID: 17361661]
  15. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):845-54 [PMID: 23726335]
  16. Ann Hum Biol. 1976 Jan;3(1):51-9 [PMID: 1275432]
  17. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100 [PMID: 19621070]
  18. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(4):20140270 [PMID: 25521202]
  19. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011 Feb;14(1):44-50 [PMID: 21205168]
  20. Arch Dis Child. 1997 Nov;77(5):396-400 [PMID: 9487960]
  21. Endocrinology. 2013 Sep;154(9):3387-400 [PMID: 23751873]
  22. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Apr;159(4):e377-e388 [PMID: 33583695]
  23. Semin Orthod. 1998 Mar;4(1):59-62 [PMID: 9573875]
  24. Endocr Rev. 1988 Nov;9(4):467-88 [PMID: 3065075]
  25. Am J Public Health. 2001 Apr;91(4):642-4 [PMID: 11291382]
  26. Acta Paediatr. 2000 Jun;89(6):637-43 [PMID: 10914954]
  27. Angle Orthod. 1982 Apr;52(2):88-112 [PMID: 6980608]
  28. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Apr 20;5:13 [PMID: 15840177]
  29. Angle Orthod. 2008 Jul;78(4):591-6 [PMID: 18302455]
  30. Angle Orthod. 2012 Nov;82(6):1123-31 [PMID: 22417653]
  31. Eur J Radiol. 2018 May;102:125-128 [PMID: 29685525]
  32. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2014;27(2):96-101 [PMID: 25523962]
  33. Horm Res. 1991;35(6):222-5 [PMID: 1819545]
  34. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Sep;158(3):383-390 [PMID: 32732004]
  35. Angle Orthod. 2002 Aug;72(4):316-23 [PMID: 12169031]
  36. Eur J Orthod. 2020 Dec 2;42(6):612-618 [PMID: 31942968]
  37. J Pediatr. 2000 Feb;136(2):149-55 [PMID: 10657818]
  38. Am J Orthod. 1985 Nov;88(5):433-8 [PMID: 3864376]
  39. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9 [PMID: 18313558]
  40. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Jul;98(1):33-40 [PMID: 2363404]
  41. Prog Orthod. 2012 Nov;13(3):288-95 [PMID: 23260540]
  42. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Jun;20 Suppl 1:106-113 [PMID: 28643930]
  43. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1999 Dec;88(433):95-8 [PMID: 10626555]
  44. Horm Res. 2002;57 Suppl 2:19-30 [PMID: 12065922]
  45. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(6):925-936 [PMID: 33998532]
  46. Endocr Dev. 2005;8:1-14 [PMID: 15722614]
  47. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Oct;27(10):1377-1382 [PMID: 30048055]
  48. Stat Med. 1987 Mar;6(2):185-92 [PMID: 3589247]
  49. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Nov;18(Suppl 1):S53-62 [PMID: 25538878]
  50. Pediatr Res. 2001 Feb;49(2):244-51 [PMID: 11158521]
  51. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Aug;25(8):4907-4914 [PMID: 33544198]
  52. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Jan;43(1):131-143 [PMID: 32740668]
  53. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):58-66 [PMID: 7817962]
  54. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1987;337:12-29 [PMID: 3481178]
  55. J Orthod. 2020 Mar;47(1):7-29 [PMID: 31718451]
  56. Angle Orthod. 2015 Mar;85(2):206-10 [PMID: 25191839]
  57. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94 [PMID: 21195583]
  58. Hum Biol. 1973 Sep;45(3):469-83 [PMID: 4750413]
  59. Angle Orthod. 2007 Nov;77(6):947-53 [PMID: 18004911]
  60. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4):515-21 [PMID: 23561413]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Cervical Vertebrae
Child
Female
Humans
Male

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0yearsold95%CVMchronologicalageCI:maturation1accordingalso74101315averageBaccetti'sstagingreviewstudiesincludedmeta-analysis9811122143significantfoundcontinentsrangeskeletalBACKGROUND:timinggrowthkeyfactorcorrectorthodontictreatmentplanningCervicalvertebraeexceptionalthoughreportedagesvaryliteratureOBJECTIVE:aimedestimateSEARCHMETHODS:SearchMEDLINE-PubMedScopusLILACSGoogleScholarCochraneCentralRegisterControlledTrialsCENTRALconductedJuly2021performedPreferredReportingItemsSystematicReviewsMeta-AnalysesPRISMAguidelinesSELECTIONCRITERIA:ObservationalinterventionalreportingclassifiedmethodDATACOLLECTIONANDANALYSIS:Methodologicalqualityassessedpooledestimatescarriedrandom-effectssinglemeansimpactsexcontinentinvestigatedsubgroupanalysesRESULTS:Forty-one9867participants4151men5716womenconfidenceinterval[CI]:CS15CS20CS36CS4CS516CS6differencesexesstagesdifferencesacrossCONCLUSIONS:successfullyestimatedGirlspresentedearliercomparedboysdiffersexceptCMVstagepointingneedpersonalizedrangesregionREGISTRATION:Registrationnumber:PROSPERO:CRD42021225422ChronologicalestimationcervicalvertebralusingBaccettimethod:systematic

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)