Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic in planning the future energy systems of developing countries using an integrated MCDM approach in the off-grid areas of Bangladesh.

Tausif Ali, Kamaleddin Aghaloo, Yie-Ru Chiu, Munir Ahmad
Author Information
  1. Tausif Ali: College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, 211100, China.
  2. Kamaleddin Aghaloo: College of Water Conservancy & Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, China.
  3. Yie-Ru Chiu: Center for General Education, Tzu-Chi University, No.701, Zhongyang Rd, Sec.3, Hualien, 97004, Taiwan.
  4. Munir Ahmad: School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.

Abstract

The COVID-19 epidemic is impeding energy development in developing countries and exacerbating the problems associated with energy planning in off-grid locations. To address such complicated decision-making issues and consider scenarios during this long-lasting pandemic, this study proposes a novel integrated MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision Making) approach using the Delphi based FO-BWM (Fuzzy Optimistic Best-Worst Method), IDOCRIW (Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights) and the Aggregated Weighting Method integrated with the CoCoSo method under different normalization methods based on a case study of the off-grid areas in Bangladesh. The results of Delphi analysis showed that a total of five criteria were agreed upon by the expert panel. After integrating 5 normalization methods with CoCoSo and using three weighting methods separately, a total of 15 MCDM models were constructed. Finally, the 8 sorted MCDM models demonstrate that Solar Home System (SHS) and Mini-Grid systems need to be prioritized, and the criterion Opportunity of Local Funding (OLF) is essential for choosing between SHS and Mini-Grid systems. Sensitivity analysis showed that the proposed method is effective for easing the dilemmas of energy planning in off-grid areas and provides useful insight to address the impacts of future pandemics on energy planning.

Keywords

References

  1. Nature. 2020 Jul;583(7815):198-201 [PMID: 32632244]
  2. Am J Ment Defic. 1981 Sep;86(2):127-37 [PMID: 7315877]
  3. Environ Res. 2021 Feb;193:110443 [PMID: 33171120]
  4. Int J Energy Res. 2021 Mar 10;45(3):3457-3463 [PMID: 33041463]
  5. Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67 [PMID: 17654487]
  6. Appl Energy. 2020 Dec 1;279:115739 [PMID: 32904736]
  7. Environ Res. 2021 Nov;202:111637 [PMID: 34233155]
  8. Appl Energy. 2021 Mar 1;285:116441 [PMID: 33519038]
  9. Energy Policy. 2021 Jul;154:112322 [PMID: 34566236]
  10. J Clean Prod. 2020 Nov 10;273:122834 [PMID: 32834565]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0energyplanningoff-gridMCDMCOVID-19integratedusingDelphiCoCoSomethodsareassystemsdevelopingcountriesaddresspandemicstudyapproachbasedFuzzyMethodmethodnormalizationBangladeshanalysisshowedtotalmodelsSHSMini-Gridfutureepidemicimpedingdevelopmentexacerbatingproblemsassociatedlocationscomplicateddecision-makingissuesconsiderscenarioslong-lastingproposesnovelMulti-CriteriaDecisionMakingFO-BWMOptimisticBest-WorstIDOCRIWIntegratedDeterminationObjectiveCriteriaWeightsAggregatedWeightingdifferentcaseresultsfivecriteriaagreeduponexpertpanelintegrating5threeweightingseparately15constructedFinally8sorteddemonstrateSolarHomeSystemneedprioritizedcriterionOpportunityLocalFundingOLFessentialchoosingSensitivityproposedeffectiveeasingdilemmasprovidesusefulinsightimpactspandemicsLessonslearnedBWMOff-grid

Similar Articles

Cited By