Postoperative stiffness after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Mohammad Ghoraishian, Brian W Hill, Thema Nicholson, Matthew L Ramsey, Gerald R Williams, Surena Namdari
Author Information
  1. Mohammad Ghoraishian: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  2. Brian W Hill: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  3. Thema Nicholson: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  4. Matthew L Ramsey: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  5. Gerald R Williams: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  6. Surena Namdari: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate and risk factors for stiffness after reverse shoulder arthroplasty and the ramifications on the patient-reported outcomes.
Method: A consecutive series of patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty were prospectively followed for one year. Passive range of motion was measured preoperatively and at regular intervals postoperatively. Patients with passive forward elevation of less than 100° or passive external rotation of less than 30° were defined as stiff. Radiographic parameters and postoperative patient-reported outcome scores were collected.
Results: Seventy-six patients were available for review. The prevalence of postoperative stiffness following reverse shoulder arthroplasty was 47% at three months, 31% at six months, and 25% at one year. Preoperative shoulder stiffness was associated with three-month postoperative stiffness only. In patients with one-year stiffness, smaller ( = 0.03) and less lateralized glenospheres ( = 0.024) were more common. Stiffness was not associated with one-year patient-reported outcome scores.
Conclusion: Stiffness is common after reverse shoulder arthroplasty and often improves at one-year after surgery. Implant design and selection may be important determinants of passive range of motion. While stiffness does not appear to influence patient-reported outcome scores, one of four patients will potentially have stiffness one year following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Level III; retrospective study.

Keywords

References

  1. Br Med Bull. 2012;104:163-74 [PMID: 22334282]
  2. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jun;24(6):972-9 [PMID: 25547853]
  3. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015 Jun 16;3(6):2325967115587861 [PMID: 26665096]
  4. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 May;25(5):763-71 [PMID: 26853756]
  5. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):339-349 [PMID: 29332666]
  6. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Sep;27(9):1721-1731 [PMID: 30030030]
  7. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jun;22(6):807-13 [PMID: 22999850]
  8. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):325-332 [PMID: 29133073]
  9. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Oct;19(7):1034-9 [PMID: 20655763]
  10. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016 Sep;8(3):288-97 [PMID: 27583112]
  11. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2558-67 [PMID: 21286887]
  12. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Mar 15;27(6):200-209 [PMID: 30260909]
  13. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Nov;27(11):1978-1986 [PMID: 29759905]
  14. Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb;29(2):290-300 [PMID: 23290184]
  15. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Mar;26(3):450-457 [PMID: 27751722]
  16. Scand J Surg. 2014 Dec;103(4):263-70 [PMID: 24694777]
  17. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Apr;86(3):388-95 [PMID: 15125127]
  18. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Sep-Oct;11(5):431-41 [PMID: 12378161]
  19. Arthroscopy. 2008 Sep;24(9):983-91 [PMID: 18760204]
  20. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep;24(9):1397-404 [PMID: 26163281]
  21. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 May;27(5):786-793 [PMID: 29275846]
  22. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Sep;21(9):1177-83 [PMID: 22047785]
  23. Arthroscopy. 2009 Aug;25(8):880-90 [PMID: 19664508]
  24. Arthroscopy. 2011 Feb;27(2):155-60 [PMID: 20970299]
  25. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Mar;19(2):290-6 [PMID: 19788957]
  26. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Feb;24(2):179-85 [PMID: 25213827]
  27. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2816-21 [PMID: 26316610]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0stiffnessshoulderreversearthroplastypatient-reportedpatientsoneyearpassivelesspostoperativeoutcomescoresone-yearstudyriskfactorsoutcomesrangemotionfollowingmonthsassociated = 0commonStiffnessdesigntotalpatientPurpose:purposeevaluaterateramificationsMethod:consecutiveseriesunderwentprospectivelyfollowedPassivemeasuredpreoperativelyregularintervalspostoperativelyPatientsforwardelevation100°externalrotation30°definedstiffRadiographicparameterscollectedResults:Seventy-sixavailablereviewprevalence47%three31%six25%Preoperativethree-monthsmaller03lateralizedglenospheres024Conclusion:oftenimprovessurgeryImplantselectionmayimportantdeterminantsappearinfluencefourwillpotentiallyLevelIIIretrospectivePostoperativeShoulderimplantsatisfaction

Similar Articles

Cited By