Evaluation Using Polar Coordinate of the Representation of Movement in the Drawings of Children Aged 5 to 8 Years.

Maria Luz Urraca-Martínez, Maria Teresa Anguera, Sylvia Sastre-Riba
Author Information
  1. Maria Luz Urraca-Martínez: Department of Educational Sciences, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.
  2. Maria Teresa Anguera: Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain. ORCID
  3. Sylvia Sastre-Riba: Department of Educational Sciences, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

The progressive complexity of mental representation is the basis for changes in human cognitive development. Evaluation of its external manifestations as graphic representation in drawings could be an instrument to understand changes in cognitive development and representational complexity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the appearance and role of the indicators used by children to represent moving figures in their drawings. This allows us to know the continuum from its non-manifestation to full expression through the vectorial interrelationships of the graphic indicators in each of the ages studied. Participants were n = 240 children from 5 to 8 years old; their drawings of two moving figures were analyzed, applying the polar coordinate technique. Results show a map of interrelations among the graphical movement indicators and changes in the drawing elements in an increasing continuum of complexity and the roles conferred to figures sketched. The conclusion is that changes evaluated in drawings can interactively reflect mental representation, and they could promote its transformation. The applied transfer of the results to education is discussed, in order to optimize the representational complexity and cognitive development.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 23;106(25):10382-5 [PMID: 19520833]
  2. Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 03;12:659569 [PMID: 34149550]
  3. Infant Behav Dev. 2015 May;39:81-91 [PMID: 25818809]
  4. Br J Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;23(4):623-44 [PMID: 21214601]
  5. Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 13;11:624922 [PMID: 33519655]
  6. J Cell Biochem. 2020 Jun;121(5-6):3070-3089 [PMID: 32056304]
  7. Dev Psychol. 2009 Jan;45(1):56-63 [PMID: 19209990]
  8. Brain Cogn. 2000 Jun-Aug;43(1-3):206-10 [PMID: 10857695]
  9. Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Jun;31(3):321-31; discussion 331-56 [PMID: 18578929]
  10. Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 30;9:13 [PMID: 29441028]
  11. J Exp Child Psychol. 2003 Oct;86(2):124-52 [PMID: 13129699]
  12. Child Dev. 2007 Mar-Apr;78(2):522-41 [PMID: 17381788]
  13. Child Dev. 2010 Sep-Oct;81(5):1356-66 [PMID: 20840226]
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):4809-13 [PMID: 24639511]
  15. Cognition. 1990 Jan;34(1):57-83 [PMID: 1689233]
  16. J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Apr;114(4):537-42 [PMID: 23313449]

MeSH Term

Child
Child, Preschool
Cognition
Educational Status
Humans
Movement

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0complexityrepresentationchangesdrawingsmentalcognitivedevelopmentindicatorsfiguresEvaluationgraphicrepresentationalchildrenmovingcontinuum58polarmovementdrawingprogressivebasishumanexternalmanifestationsinstrumentunderstandaimstudyevaluateappearanceroleusedrepresentallowsusknownon-manifestationfullexpressionvectorialinterrelationshipsagesstudiedParticipantsn=240yearsoldtwoanalyzedapplyingcoordinatetechniqueResultsshowmapinterrelationsamonggraphicalelementsincreasingrolesconferredsketchedconclusionevaluatedcaninteractivelyreflectpromotetransformationappliedtransferresultseducationdiscussedorderoptimizeUsingPolarCoordinateRepresentationMovementDrawingsChildrenAgedYearsevaluationinfancyneuroconstructivismcoordinates

Similar Articles

Cited By