Statistical learning in children with a family risk of dyslexia.

Elise de Bree, Josje Verhagen
Author Information
  1. Elise de Bree: Development and Education of Youth in Diverse Societies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Josje Verhagen: Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. ORCID

Abstract

The assumption that statistical learning is affected in dyslexia has generally been evaluated in children and adults with diagnosed dyslexia, not in pre-literate children with a family risk (FR) of dyslexia. In this study, four-to-five-year-old FR children (n = 25) and No-FR children (n = 33) completed tasks of emerging literacy (phoneme awareness and RAN). They also performed an online non-adjacent dependency learning (NADL) task, based on the Serial Reaction Time (SRT) task paradigm. Children's accuracy (hits), signal sensitivity (d') and reaction times were measured. The FR group performed marginally more poorly on phoneme awareness and significantly more poorly on RAN than the No-FR group. Regarding NADL outcomes, the results were less straightforward: the data suggested successful statistical learning for both groups, as indicated by the hit and reaction time curves found. However, the FR group was less accurate and slower on the task than the No-FR group. Furthermore, unlike the No-FR group, performance in the FR group varied as a function of the specific stimulus presented. Taken together, these findings fail to show a robust difference in statistical learning between children with and without an FR of dyslexia at preschool age, in line with earlier work on older children and adults with dyslexia.

Keywords

References

  1. Cognition. 2017 Jun;163:103-120 [PMID: 28319684]
  2. Psychol Bull. 2016 May;142(5):498-545 [PMID: 26727308]
  3. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):658-80 [PMID: 11757874]
  4. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Dec;1145:184-98 [PMID: 19076397]
  5. Infancy. 2005 Mar;7(2):183-206 [PMID: 33430549]
  6. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2007 Nov;11(6):368-74 [PMID: 17467315]
  7. Dyslexia. 2021 May;27(2):168-186 [PMID: 33631835]
  8. Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;42 Suppl 3:692-727 [PMID: 28986971]
  9. Dyslexia. 2002 Jan-Mar;8(1):43-52 [PMID: 11990224]
  10. Psychol Sci. 2002 Sep;13(5):431-6 [PMID: 12219809]
  11. Cortex. 2011 Jan;47(1):117-27 [PMID: 19818437]
  12. Cortex. 2005 Jun;41(3):399-433 [PMID: 15871604]
  13. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 May;52(5):547-57 [PMID: 21126246]
  14. J Pers Assess. 2003 Feb;80(1):99-103 [PMID: 12584072]
  15. Cognition. 2018 Aug;177:198-213 [PMID: 29705523]
  16. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Oct;41(7):869-74 [PMID: 11079429]
  17. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;16(2):319-337 [PMID: 33136519]
  18. Dev Psychol. 2021 May;57(5):749-770 [PMID: 34166019]
  19. Neuropsychology. 2017 May;31(4):371-382 [PMID: 28150963]
  20. Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 12;8:1706 [PMID: 29075209]
  21. Dyslexia. 2022 May;28(2):185-201 [PMID: 35289019]
  22. Dev Psychol. 2013 Jul;49(7):1348-65 [PMID: 22924367]
  23. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2012 Sep;119(9):999-1010 [PMID: 22684418]
  24. Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):643-50 [PMID: 20805586]
  25. Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Nov;70:126-137 [PMID: 28934698]
  26. Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):418-432 [PMID: 26944577]
  27. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Dec;104(4):410-26 [PMID: 19691970]
  28. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Oct;48(5):1033-47 [PMID: 16411794]
  29. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3460-76 [PMID: 23920029]
  30. Psychol Bull. 2012 Mar;138(2):322-52 [PMID: 22250824]
  31. Dyslexia. 2010 May;16(2):143-61 [PMID: 20440744]
  32. Trends Neurosci. 2007 Apr;30(4):135-41 [PMID: 17328970]
  33. J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Dec;45(6):1427-1449 [PMID: 26861215]
  34. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Nov 08;26(4):1080-1091 [PMID: 28796861]
  35. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(1):108-14 [PMID: 12427569]
  36. Ann Dyslexia. 2017 Jul;67(2):147-162 [PMID: 27766563]
  37. J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Nov;98(3):131-52 [PMID: 17692331]
  38. Cogn Sci. 2012 Mar;36(2):286-304 [PMID: 21974775]
  39. J Child Lang. 2013 Jan;40(1):11-28 [PMID: 23217289]
  40. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999 Feb;31(1):137-49 [PMID: 10495845]
  41. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2015;11:283-307 [PMID: 25594880]
  42. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 5;14(8):e0220041 [PMID: 31381565]
  43. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1243-52 [PMID: 23698615]
  44. Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;29(3):418-428 [PMID: 29346032]
  45. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):401-26 [PMID: 11561917]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Child
Child, Preschool
Dyslexia
Humans
Learning
Literacy
Reaction Time
Reading

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0learningdyslexiachildrenFRgroupstatisticalNo-FRtaskfamilyriskreactionadultsphonemeawarenessRANperformednon-adjacentdependencyNADLpoorlylesstimeassumptionaffectedgenerallyevaluateddiagnosedpre-literatestudyfour-to-five-year-oldn = 25n = 33completedtasksemergingliteracyalsoonlinebasedSerialReactionTimeSRTparadigmChildren'saccuracyhitssignalsensitivityd'timesmeasuredmarginallysignificantlyRegardingoutcomesresultsstraightforward:datasuggestedsuccessfulgroupsindicatedhitcurvesfoundHoweveraccurateslowerFurthermoreunlikeperformancevariedfunctionspecificstimuluspresentedTakentogetherfindingsfailshowrobustdifferencewithoutpreschoolagelineearlierworkolderStatisticalserial

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)