How the expertise heuristic accelerates decision-making and credibility judgments in social media by means of effort reduction.

Judith Meinert, Nicole C Krämer
Author Information
  1. Judith Meinert: Social Psychology - Media and Communication, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany. ORCID
  2. Nicole C Krämer: Social Psychology - Media and Communication, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.

Abstract

Real-time communication, unlimited distribution of information, and the lack of editorial supervision in social media communication aggravate recipients' credibility evaluations and information selection by what aspects of the source such as expertise have emerged as important anchors for evaluations. It has long been assumed that credibility judgments in social media are specifically guided by heuristics. However, the existing studies merely give indications, for example, based on individuals' self-report but do not test whether important attributes and prerequisites of heuristic decision-making, such as effort reduction, are present. Against this background, the current study (N = 185) analyses by applying a reduced two-alternative choice paradigm whether the relation between the expertise cue and credibility judgments and the choice of information sources is guided by a heuristic, namely the expertise heuristic. Findings indicate that the presence of the expertise cue reduced respondents' task latencies significantly, although participants' decision behavior was not independent from additional information. This is discussed in detail with recourse to theoretical conceptualizations of cognitive heuristics.

References

  1. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Mar;121(3):275-84 [PMID: 16099416]
  2. Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;134(2):207-22 [PMID: 18298269]
  3. Psychol Rev. 2002 Jan;109(1):75-90 [PMID: 11863042]
  4. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):269-73 [PMID: 23417270]
  5. Psychol Rev. 2011 Jan;118(1):97-109 [PMID: 21244188]
  6. Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31 [PMID: 17835457]
  7. Psychol Rev. 1996 Oct;103(4):650-69 [PMID: 8888650]
  8. Psychol Rev. 1996 Jul;103(3):582-91; discusion 592-6 [PMID: 8759048]
  9. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Sep;26(5):1332-46 [PMID: 11009261]
  10. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jul;30(4):923-935 [PMID: 15238034]
  11. Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 22;7:1402 [PMID: 27713710]
  12. Int J Med Inform. 2010 Jun;79(6):391-400 [PMID: 20188623]
  13. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012 Oct;15(10):515-20 [PMID: 22970827]

MeSH Term

Heuristics
Humans
Judgment
Social Media

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0expertiseinformationcredibilityheuristicsocialmediajudgmentscommunicationevaluationsimportantguidedheuristicswhetherdecision-makingeffortreductionreducedchoicecueReal-timeunlimiteddistributionlackeditorialsupervisionaggravaterecipients'selectionaspectssourceemergedanchorslongassumedspecificallyHoweverexistingstudiesmerelygiveindicationsexamplebasedindividuals'self-reporttestattributesprerequisitespresentbackgroundcurrentstudyN=185analysesapplyingtwo-alternativeparadigmrelationsourcesnamelyFindingsindicatepresencerespondents'tasklatenciessignificantlyalthoughparticipants'decisionbehaviorindependentadditionaldiscusseddetailrecoursetheoreticalconceptualizationscognitiveacceleratesmeans

Similar Articles

Cited By