Capacity and Readiness Assessment of Healthcare Facilities for Digital Health Interventions Against Tuberculosis and HIV in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Emnet Getachew, Yimtubezinash Woldeamanuel, Tsegahun Manyazewal
Author Information
  1. Emnet Getachew: Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  2. Yimtubezinash Woldeamanuel: Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  3. Tsegahun Manyazewal: Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Abstract

Background: There is a high level of concern that low-income countries lack the capacity and readiness to effectively adopt, implement, and scale up digital health interventions (DHIs). We aimed to assess the infrastructure and human resource capacity and readiness of healthcare facilities to adopt and implement any new DHI for tuberculosis (TB) and HIV care and treatment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Method: We carried out a cross-sectional, mixed-methods study in 14 public healthcare facilities that provide TB and HIV care and treatment services. Providers' perceived readiness to adopt and implement digital health was assessed using a self-administered questionnaire designed based on an adapted eHealth readiness assessment model that covers six domains: core readiness, organizational cultural readiness, value proposition readiness, technological readiness, regulatory policy readiness, and operational resource readiness. The infrastructure and human resource capacity were assessed on-site using a tool adapted from the Technology Infrastructure Checklist. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and the significant relationship between the composite variables was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients ().
Result: We assessed 14 facilities on-site and surveyed 60 TB and HIV healthcare providers. According to , all the six technology acceptance domains had a value of >0.8, suggesting a strong interrelatedness between the measuring items. The correlation between technological readiness and operational resource readiness was significant ( = ). The providers perceived their work environment as good enough in electronic data protection, while more efforts are needed in planning, training, adapting, and implementing digital health. Of the 14 facilities, 64.3% lack the plan to establish a functional local area network, and 43% lack skilled staff on payroll to provide maintenance of computers and other digital technologies.
Conclusion: Like many developing countries, there was a modest infrastructure and human resource capacity and readiness of public healthcare facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, to nurture and strengthen DHIs across the TB and HIV cascades of care. Technological and operational resource readiness, including funding and a Well-trained workforce, are essential for successful implementation and use of digital health against the two infectious diseases of global importance in such settings.

Keywords

References

  1. J Glob Health. 2021 Nov 20;11:16006 [PMID: 34912559]
  2. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 2;383(1):1-4 [PMID: 32609976]
  3. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2020 Feb;33(1):44-50 [PMID: 31789695]
  4. NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Sep 18;3:120 [PMID: 33015373]
  5. BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 16;10(6):e035272 [PMID: 32554739]
  6. Ann Glob Health. 2021 Nov 15;87(1):109 [PMID: 34824990]
  7. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Dec 12;14:115 [PMID: 25495757]
  8. PLoS One. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0224277 [PMID: 31721767]
  9. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Mar 15;11:611304 [PMID: 33791235]
  10. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2021 Jun 29;24:100254 [PMID: 34278006]
  11. NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Oct 28;4(1):153 [PMID: 34711924]
  12. NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Aug 17;4(1):125 [PMID: 34404895]
  13. NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Nov 12;4(1):157 [PMID: 34773071]
  14. J Med Chem. 2021 Apr 22;64(8):4359-4395 [PMID: 33826327]
  15. Int J Public Health. 2021 Aug 09;66:633917 [PMID: 34434083]
  16. Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 01;12:635089 [PMID: 34790115]
  17. Front Digit Health. 2021 Sep 06;3:689646 [PMID: 34713161]
  18. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2021 Oct-Dec;10(4):364-372 [PMID: 34916453]
  19. PLoS One. 2020 Jun 16;15(6):e0234711 [PMID: 32544214]
  20. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 15;72(6):913-919 [PMID: 33033829]
  21. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Jul;24 Suppl 3:e25729 [PMID: 34189847]
  22. Glob Policy. 2021 Jul;12(Suppl 6):110-114 [PMID: 34589141]
  23. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 5;23(2):e22189 [PMID: 33492240]
  24. Future Healthc J. 2019 Jun;6(Suppl 2):38-39 [PMID: 31572934]
  25. J Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Jan 31;4(2):189-214 [PMID: 35415442]
  26. JAMA. 2021 Nov 9;326(18):1795-1796 [PMID: 34677577]
  27. Front Digit Health. 2021 Nov 03;3:730755 [PMID: 34806076]
  28. Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):811-812 [PMID: 32398877]
  29. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Jan 08;14:59-66 [PMID: 33447042]
  30. Lancet HIV. 2021 Jun;8(6):e319-e321 [PMID: 34087095]
  31. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Dec 15;284:236-238 [PMID: 34920517]
  32. Front Digit Health. 2021 Sep 28;3:730680 [PMID: 34713200]
  33. Front Digit Health. 2021 Nov 25;3:764735 [PMID: 34901926]
  34. Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):244-249 [PMID: 33432172]
  35. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 08;8:647897 [PMID: 34307394]
  36. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Nov 25;14:4749-4756 [PMID: 34858070]
  37. Front Digit Health. 2021 Feb 04;2:602093 [PMID: 34713066]
  38. Eur Respir J. 2018 Jan 11;51(1): [PMID: 29326332]
  39. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 10;16(1):644 [PMID: 27832788]
  40. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2021 Oct-Dec;10(4):437-441 [PMID: 34916465]
  41. Trials. 2020 May 5;21(1):383 [PMID: 32370774]

Grants

  1. D43 TW009127/FIC NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0readinessdigitalhealthresourceHIVfacilitiesTBassessedcapacityhumanhealthcareEthiopiausinglackadoptimplementinfrastructurecareAddisAbaba14operationalcountriesDHIstuberculosistreatmentpublicprovideperceivedadaptedeHealthsixvaluetechnologicalon-sitesignificantcorrelationproviderstechnologyBackground:highlevelconcernlow-incomeeffectivelyscaleinterventionsaimedassessnewDHIMethod:carriedcross-sectionalmixed-methodsstudyservicesProviders'self-administeredquestionnairedesignedbasedassessmentmodelcoversdomains:coreorganizationalculturalpropositionregulatorypolicytoolTechnologyInfrastructureChecklistInternalconsistencyCronbach'salpharelationshipcompositevariablesPearson'scoefficientsResult:surveyed60Accordingacceptancedomains>08suggestingstronginterrelatednessmeasuringitems=workenvironmentgoodenoughelectronicdataprotectioneffortsneededplanningtrainingadaptingimplementing643%planestablishfunctionallocalareanetwork43%skilledstaffpayrollmaintenancecomputerstechnologiesConclusion:LikemanydevelopingmodestnurturestrengthenacrosscascadesTechnologicalincludingfundingWell-trainedworkforceessentialsuccessfulimplementationusetwoinfectiousdiseasesglobalimportancesettingsCapacityReadinessAssessmentHealthcareFacilitiesDigitalHealthInterventionsTuberculosisimmunodeficiencyvirus

Similar Articles

Cited By