Quantal response equilibrium for the Prisoner's Dilemma game in Markov strategies.

T S Kozitsina, I V Kozitsin, I S Menshikov
Author Information
  1. T S Kozitsina: Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutsky lane 9, Dolgoprudny, Moscow region, 141700, Russian Federation. tatyana.babkina@phystech.edu.
  2. I V Kozitsin: Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutsky lane 9, Dolgoprudny, Moscow region, 141700, Russian Federation.
  3. I S Menshikov: Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutsky lane 9, Dolgoprudny, Moscow region, 141700, Russian Federation.

Abstract

Within the studies of human cooperation, there are gaps that require further investigation. One possible area for growth is developing theoretical concepts which describe high levels of cooperation. In this paper, we present a symmetrical quantal response equilibrium (QRE) in Prisoner's Dilemma game (PD) constructed in Markov strategies (tolerance to defection and mutual cooperation). To prove the adequacy of the resulting equilibrium, we compare it with the previously found Nash equilibrium in PD in Markov strategies: the QRE converges with the Nash equilibrium that corresponds with the theory. Next, we investigate the properties of QRE in PD in Markov strategies by testing it against experimental data. For low levels of rationality, the found equilibrium manages to describe high cooperation. We derive the levels of rationality under which the intersection between Nash and QRE occurs. Lastly, our experimental data suggest that QRE serves as a dividing line between behavior with low and high cooperation.

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 16;107(7):2962-6 [PMID: 20142470]
  2. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471 [PMID: 32355299]
  3. Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Apr 10;286(1900):20190041 [PMID: 30940065]
  4. Nature. 2017 Apr 13;544(7649):227-230 [PMID: 28355181]
  5. PLoS One. 2017 Apr 10;12(4):e0175492 [PMID: 28394939]
  6. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Oct;92(4):042813 [PMID: 26565295]
  7. Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 20;8:596 [PMID: 28473787]
  8. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 26;9(8):e105391 [PMID: 25157502]
  9. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Sep 8;13(9):e1005732 [PMID: 28886010]
  10. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Jul;92(1):012819 [PMID: 26274237]
  11. Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 20;6:29622 [PMID: 27435940]
  12. Phys Rev E. 2018 Apr;97(4-1):042321 [PMID: 29758626]
  13. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0180754 [PMID: 29190280]
  14. Nat Commun. 2014 Apr 22;5:3677 [PMID: 24751464]
  15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 29;108(48):19193-8 [PMID: 22084103]
  16. J R Soc Interface. 2021 Feb;18(175):20200880 [PMID: 33561377]
  17. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;30(9):1095-107 [PMID: 15359014]

MeSH Term

Cooperative Behavior
Game Theory
Humans
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Prisoner Dilemma

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0equilibriumcooperationQREMarkovhighlevelsPDstrategiesNashdescriberesponsePrisoner'sDilemmagamefoundexperimentaldatalowrationalityWithinstudieshumangapsrequireinvestigationOnepossibleareagrowthdevelopingtheoreticalconceptspaperpresentsymmetricalquantalconstructedtolerancedefectionmutualproveadequacyresultingcomparepreviouslystrategies:convergescorrespondstheoryNextinvestigatepropertiestestingmanagesderiveintersectionoccursLastlysuggestservesdividinglinebehaviorQuantal

Similar Articles

Cited By