Cryopreserved platelets and amotosalen-treated plasma in an experimental clot formation set-up.

Per Sandgren, Kristina Ehn, Linda Larsson, Michael Uhlin, Agneta Wikman
Author Information
  1. Per Sandgren: Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine (KITM), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  2. Kristina Ehn: Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine (KITM), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  3. Linda Larsson: Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine (KITM), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  4. Michael Uhlin: Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine (KITM), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  5. Agneta Wikman: Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine (KITM), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amotosalen treatment of plasma and cryopreservation of platelets affect the quality and potentially the interplay between platelets and coagulation factors. We set up an experimental clot formation study to test the hypothesis that amotosalen treatment of plasma affects the interaction with different platelet preparations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pooled plasma units (n=16) were subjected to coagulation tests before and after pathogen inactivation with amotosalen treatment (PI) and aliquots were frozen at -80°C. Fresh and cryopreserved platelets were analyzed for phenotypic and activity markers. Finally, coagulation properties of different combinations of platelets and plasma, before and after PI, were analyzed by viscoelastography (ROTEM).
RESULTS: PI of plasma reduced the concentration of several coagulation factors (p<0.01). Cryopreservation altered phenotypic expression and reduced the platelets' ability to respond to agonists (p<0.0001). The interplay between all plasma derivatives and cryopreserved platelets resulted in shortened coagulation time (p<0.0001) but prolonged clot formation time and reduced clot strength (p<0.0001) as compared to the interaction between fresh platelets with different plasma variants. PI of the plasma does not seem to have a major impact on coagulation time, clot formation time or clot strength.
DISCUSSION: Our data show that the reduced concentration of coagulation factors after PI treatment of plasma are negligible measured by viscoelastography, with fresh and cryopreserved platelets in this experimental clot formation setup, and that platelets play a more pronounced role. Cryopreserved platelets are more activated and result in reduced clot stability.

References

  1. Transfus Med Rev. 2007 Oct;21(4):287-94 [PMID: 17900490]
  2. Transfus Med Hemother. 2011;38(1):19-31 [PMID: 21779203]
  3. Blood Transfus. 2014 Oct;12(4):491-6 [PMID: 24960655]
  4. J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jan;11(1):2-16 [PMID: 23106920]
  5. JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):471-82 [PMID: 25647203]
  6. Thromb J. 2015 Feb 05;13:8 [PMID: 25688179]
  7. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2018 May 20;2(3):450-460 [PMID: 30046749]
  8. Transfusion. 2014 Sep;54(9):2292-300 [PMID: 24689812]
  9. Transfusion. 2016 Jun;56(6):1377-83 [PMID: 27080102]
  10. Transfusion. 2006 Jul;46(7):1168-77 [PMID: 16836564]
  11. Toxicol Pathol. 2011 Jan;39(1):273-80 [PMID: 21119054]
  12. Transfusion. 2017 Apr;57(4):997-1006 [PMID: 28150310]
  13. Blood. 2008 Oct 15;112(8):3227-33 [PMID: 18612104]
  14. Thromb Haemost. 2014 Mar 3;111(3):447-57 [PMID: 24258426]
  15. Cryobiology. 2011 Apr;62(2):100-6 [PMID: 21241687]
  16. Vox Sang. 2018 Oct;113(7):611-621 [PMID: 30156292]
  17. Blood. 2006 May 15;107(10):3902-6 [PMID: 16455953]
  18. Physiol Rev. 2013 Jan;93(1):327-58 [PMID: 23303912]
  19. Transfus Apher Sci. 2006 Feb;34(1):125-30 [PMID: 16376152]
  20. Transfusion. 2021 Feb;61(2):546-556 [PMID: 33345368]
  21. Transfusion. 2005 Dec;45(12):1890-8 [PMID: 16371041]
  22. Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):314-21 [PMID: 23780419]
  23. Vox Sang. 2015 May;108(4):340-9 [PMID: 25557354]
  24. Transfusion. 2021 Apr;61(4):1235-1246 [PMID: 33694171]
  25. Transfus Med Rev. 1997 Apr;11(2):130-44 [PMID: 9140172]
  26. World J Emerg Surg. 2012 Aug 22;7 Suppl 1:S3 [PMID: 23531394]
  27. Blood Transfus. 2020 Nov;18(6):454-464 [PMID: 33000752]
  28. J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Jun;6(6):995-1002 [PMID: 18489431]
  29. Blood. 2011 Apr 7;117(14):3912-20 [PMID: 21252089]
  30. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2007 Mar;18(2):145-50 [PMID: 17287631]
  31. Blood Rev. 2021 Mar;46:100733 [PMID: 32682574]
  32. Transfusion. 2021 Jan;61(1):167-177 [PMID: 33295030]
  33. Thromb Haemost. 1997 Feb;77(2):383-6 [PMID: 9157600]
  34. Vox Sang. 2000;78(4):209-16 [PMID: 10895093]
  35. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017 Oct;77(6):397-405 [PMID: 28632435]
  36. Blood Transfus. 2020 May;18(3):191-199 [PMID: 31403931]
  37. J Extracell Vesicles. 2016 May 04;5:30422 [PMID: 27151397]
  38. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2007 Apr;18(3):247-52 [PMID: 17413761]
  39. Transfusion. 2018 Nov;58(11):2657-2668 [PMID: 30281156]
  40. Transfus Med Rev. 2009 Apr;23(2):124-33 [PMID: 19304113]

MeSH Term

Humans
Blood Platelets
Blood Coagulation Tests
Cryopreservation
Blood Coagulation Factors

Chemicals

amotosalen
Blood Coagulation Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0plasmaplateletsclotcoagulationformationPIreducedtreatmentp<0timefactorsexperimentaldifferentcryopreserved0001interplayamotosaleninteractionanalyzedphenotypicviscoelastographyconcentrationstrengthfreshCryopreservedBACKGROUND:AmotosalencryopreservationaffectqualitypotentiallysetstudytesthypothesisaffectsplateletpreparationsMATERIALSANDMETHODS:Pooledunitsn=16subjectedtestspathogeninactivationaliquotsfrozen-80°CFreshactivitymarkersFinallypropertiescombinationsROTEMRESULTS:several01Cryopreservationalteredexpressionplatelets'abilityrespondagonistsderivativesresultedshortenedprolongedcomparedvariantsseemmajorimpactDISCUSSION:datashownegligiblemeasuredsetupplaypronouncedroleactivatedresultstabilityamotosalen-treatedset-up

Similar Articles

Cited By