Determinants of Sick and Dead Pig Waste Recycling-A Case Study of Hebei, Shandong, and Henan Provinces in China.

Xu Ge, Apurbo Sarkar, Si Ruishi, Md Ashfikur Rahman, Jony Abdul Azim, Shuxia Zhang, Lu Qian
Author Information
  1. Xu Ge: College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China. ORCID
  2. Apurbo Sarkar: College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
  3. Si Ruishi: School of Public Administration, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710018, China.
  4. Md Ashfikur Rahman: Development Studies Discipline, Social Science School, Khulna University, Khulna 751013, Bangladesh. ORCID
  5. Jony Abdul Azim: School of International Education, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.
  6. Shuxia Zhang: College of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
  7. Lu Qian: College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China. ORCID

Abstract

Improper handling of sick and dead pigs may seriously affect public health, socio-economic conditions, and eventually cause environmental pollution. However, effective promotion of sick and dead pig (SDP) waste recycling has become the prime focus of current rural governance. Therefore, the study explores the impact of commitment, rewards, and punishments to capture the recycling behavior of farmers' sick and dead pig waste management. The study employs factor analysis, the probit model, and the moderating effect model to craft the findings. The study's empirical setup comprises the survey data collected from the Hebei, Shandong, and Henan provinces, representing the major pig-producing provinces in China. The study found that the commitment, reward, and punishment mechanisms are essential factors affecting the farmers' decision-making on recycling sick and dead pig waste. The marginal effect analysis found that the reward and punishment mechanism is more effective than the farmers' commitment. The study confirmed that in the recycling treatment of sick and dead pig waste, the farmers' commitment and the government's reward and punishment policy are the main factors that influence farmers to manage sick and dead pig waste properly. Therefore, the government should highlight the importance of effective waste management, and training facilities should also be extended firmly. The government should impose strict rules and regulations to restrict the irresponsible dumping of farm waste. Monitoring mechanisms should be put in place promptly.

Keywords

References

  1. Waste Manag. 2011 Apr;31(4):767-78 [PMID: 21216585]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 15;16(16): [PMID: 31443319]
  3. Front Microbiol. 2020 Apr 22;11:623 [PMID: 32390969]
  4. Waste Manag. 2015 Sep;43:230-8 [PMID: 26013692]
  5. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jan;24(2):1469-1483 [PMID: 27783253]
  6. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(3):4690-4709 [PMID: 34410596]
  7. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002 Apr 1;220(7):1003-5 [PMID: 12420777]
  8. Prev Vet Med. 2011 Oct 1;102(1):41-9 [PMID: 21733585]
  9. Anim Nutr. 2015 Sep;1(3):104-112 [PMID: 29767170]
  10. Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb 15;177(4):292-8 [PMID: 23371353]
  11. Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jul;116:285-9 [PMID: 22525261]
  12. Waste Manag Res. 2020 May;38(5):528-536 [PMID: 31607260]
  13. Bioresour Technol. 2008 Sep;99(14):6017-27 [PMID: 18280151]
  14. Prev Vet Med. 1997 Jan;29(3):221-39 [PMID: 9234406]
  15. Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21190 [PMID: 33273670]
  16. Nat Food. 2020 Apr;1(4):221-228 [PMID: 33634268]
  17. Waste Manag. 2012 May;32(5):933-8 [PMID: 22119516]
  18. Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 08;11(4): [PMID: 33917993]
  19. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021 Dec;175:1-13 [PMID: 35350408]
  20. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jan;23(1):661-72 [PMID: 26330314]
  21. Waste Manag. 2020 Aug 1;114:96-106 [PMID: 32659692]
  22. Environ Int. 2017 Oct;107:111-130 [PMID: 28719840]
  23. Appl Psychol Meas. 2020 Oct;44(7-8):515-530 [PMID: 34565932]
  24. Prev Vet Med. 2021 Jan;186:105208 [PMID: 33310195]
  25. Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 21;9:702699 [PMID: 34368065]
  26. J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113858 [PMID: 34607139]
  27. Sci Total Environ. 2018 May 1;622-623:702-709 [PMID: 29223896]
  28. Sci Total Environ. 2014 Feb 1;470-471:865-75 [PMID: 24211346]
  29. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2021;12(11):5923-5935 [PMID: 33777261]
  30. J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 30;130:447-56 [PMID: 24184986]
  31. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Feb;24(4):3997-4007 [PMID: 27915428]

Grants

  1. Grant No: 72103161/National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Project
  2. (Grant No:20YJA790089)/The Ministry of education of Humanities and Social Science project
  3. (Grant No:2020JZ-17)/Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, China

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0wastesickdeadpigrecyclingcommitmentstudyfarmers'rewardpunishmenteffectiveThereforebehaviormanagementanalysismodeleffectHebeiShandongHenanprovincesChinafoundmechanismsfactorsmechanismfarmersgovernmentImproperhandlingpigsmayseriouslyaffectpublichealthsocio-economicconditionseventuallycauseenvironmentalpollutionHoweverpromotionSDPbecomeprimefocuscurrentruralgovernanceexploresimpactrewardspunishmentscaptureemploysfactorprobitmoderatingcraftfindingsstudy'sempiricalsetupcomprisessurveydatacollectedrepresentingmajorpig-producingessentialaffectingdecision-makingmarginalconfirmedtreatmentgovernment'spolicymaininfluencemanageproperlyhighlightimportancetrainingfacilitiesalsoextendedfirmlyimposestrictrulesregulationsrestrictirresponsibledumpingfarmMonitoringputplacepromptlyDeterminantsSickDeadPigWasteRecycling-ACaseStudyProvincespersonal

Similar Articles

Cited By