Bone Union Quality after Fracture Fixation of Mandibular Head with Compression Magnesium Screws.

Marcin Kozakiewicz, Izabela Gabryelczak
Author Information
  1. Marcin Kozakiewicz: Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 113 Żeromskiego Str., 90-549 Lodz, Poland. ORCID
  2. Izabela Gabryelczak: Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 113 Żeromskiego Str., 90-549 Lodz, Poland. ORCID

Abstract

For some years now, fixation devices created with resorbable magnesium alloys for the mandibular head have been clinically available and are beginning to be used. It is thus valuable to evaluate the quality of unions in these cases. The aim of this study was radiological comparison of magnesium versus titanium open reduction and rigid fixations in the mandible condylar head. Thirty-one patients were treated for fractures of the mandibular head with magnesium WE43 alloy headless compression screws (diameter 2.3 mm) and, as a reference group, 29 patients were included with similar construction titanium screws (diameter 1.8 mm). The 12-month results of the treatment were evaluated by the texture analysis of CT. Near similar treatment results were found with magnesium screws in traditional titanium fixation. Magnesium screws result in a higher density of the bone structure in the mandibular head. Conclusions: The quantitative evaluation of bone union after surgical treatment of mandibular head fracture with magnesium compression headless screws indicates that stable consolidation was achieved. Undoubtedly, the resorption process of the screws was found to be incomplete after 12 months, evidenced by a marked densification of the bone structure at the fracture site.

Keywords

References

  1. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Nov;87:68-79 [PMID: 30041141]
  2. Bioact Mater. 2020 Jan 11;5(1):44-54 [PMID: 31956735]
  3. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Sep;46(6):482-4 [PMID: 18499313]
  4. Arch Med Sci. 2015 Mar 16;11(1):78-84 [PMID: 25861292]
  5. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;39(7):660-5 [PMID: 20430584]
  6. Biomaterials. 2005 Jun;26(17):3557-63 [PMID: 15621246]
  7. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul;55(6):623-625 [PMID: 28460872]
  8. Head Face Med. 2020 Nov 30;16(1):33 [PMID: 33256789]
  9. Materials (Basel). 2019 Apr 03;12(7): [PMID: 30987137]
  10. Materials (Basel). 2020 Aug 18;13(16): [PMID: 32824644]
  11. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 May;45(5):704-709 [PMID: 28318918]
  12. Acta Biomater. 2014 Nov;10(11):4561-4573 [PMID: 25034646]
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 May;111(6):1828-40 [PMID: 12711942]
  14. Acta Biomater. 2017 Oct 15;62:434-445 [PMID: 28844965]
  15. Materials (Basel). 2020 Jun 10;13(11): [PMID: 32531885]
  16. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Nov;23(11):4059-4066 [PMID: 30891645]
  17. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2004 Mar;8(2):63-74 [PMID: 15045529]
  18. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018 Jun 14;2018:3714725 [PMID: 30013720]
  19. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Oct;45(10):1639-1646 [PMID: 28818322]
  20. Materials (Basel). 2020 Jun 30;13(13): [PMID: 32629925]
  21. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013 Jul;101(7):1898-906 [PMID: 23203562]
  22. Front Immunol. 2019 Nov 08;10:2662 [PMID: 31781128]
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 19;113(3):716-21 [PMID: 26729859]
  24. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014 Jun;7(2):92-100 [PMID: 25050145]
  25. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jan;40(1):38-44 [PMID: 20961735]
  26. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;54(8):872-877 [PMID: 27521271]
  27. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jan;56(1):74-76 [PMID: 29174002]
  28. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Aug;62(8):919-24 [PMID: 15278854]
  29. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;69(12):3019-25 [PMID: 21549488]
  30. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Dec;58(12):7586-91 [PMID: 25288077]
  31. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Feb;62(2):155-63 [PMID: 14762747]
  32. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009 Apr;94(1):66-76 [PMID: 18922598]
  33. J Orthop Res. 2004 Jul;22(4):709-15 [PMID: 15183425]
  34. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;44(3):309-17 [PMID: 26805919]
  35. Acta Biomater. 2013 Nov;9(10):8643-9 [PMID: 22963846]
  36. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;68(7):1573-7 [PMID: 20417018]
  37. Biomaterials. 2014 Aug;35(24):6299-310 [PMID: 24816285]
  38. Acta Biomater. 2010 May;6(5):1869-77 [PMID: 19818422]
  39. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 May;56(5):604-14; discussion 614-5 [PMID: 9590343]
  40. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993 Jun;51(6):666-70 [PMID: 8492205]
  41. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 Dec;48(12):1138-1145 [PMID: 33218743]
  42. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Oct;76(10):2138-2150 [PMID: 29684308]
  43. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Mar;25(3):309-18 [PMID: 23222473]
  44. Maedica (Bucur). 2020 Jun;15(2):258-265 [PMID: 32952693]
  45. Head Face Med. 2020 Oct 19;16(1):25 [PMID: 33076933]
  46. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007 Feb 1;458(1):48-56 [PMID: 16712775]
  47. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Aug 30;7(8):e2384 [PMID: 31592391]
  48. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Nov;46(11):1953-1959 [PMID: 30292752]
  49. Oral Dis. 2007 Nov;13(6):530-7 [PMID: 17944668]
  50. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;45(6):862-871 [PMID: 28457825]
  51. Biomaterials. 2000 Dec;21(24):2607-13 [PMID: 11071610]
  52. Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 18;15(3): [PMID: 35160655]
  53. Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 07;6:27374 [PMID: 27271057]
  54. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020 Mar;108:110389 [PMID: 31923970]
  55. J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 21;8(1): [PMID: 30669680]
  56. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Jun 10;8:564 [PMID: 32587850]
  57. Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 06;14(2): [PMID: 33418924]
  58. Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 19;13(2): [PMID: 31963840]
  59. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;10(4):608-614 [PMID: 32963953]
  60. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Dec 1;69:247-54 [PMID: 27612710]
  61. Biomaterials. 2020 Apr;238:119829 [PMID: 32058868]
  62. Acta Biomater. 2019 Oct 15;98:3-22 [PMID: 31029830]
  63. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;51(2):138-43 [PMID: 22546281]
  64. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 May;64(5):868-72 [PMID: 16631501]
  65. Materials (Basel). 2015 Aug 31;8(9):5744-5794 [PMID: 28793533]
  66. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 Apr;48(4):413-420 [PMID: 32127305]

Grants

  1. 503/5-061-02/503-51-001-18, 503/5-061-02/503-51-001-17, and 503/5-061-02/503-51-002-18/Medical University of Lodz

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0headmagnesiumscrewstreatmentmandibularbonefracturefixationtitaniummandibleopenrigidcondylarpatientsheadlesscompressiondiametermmsimilarresultsfoundMagnesiumstructureunionsurgicalyearsnowdevicescreatedresorbablealloysclinicallyavailablebeginningusedthusvaluableevaluatequalityunionscasesaimstudyradiologicalcomparisonversusreductionfixationsThirty-onetreatedfracturesWE43alloy23referencegroup29includedconstruction1812-monthevaluatedtextureanalysisCTNeartraditionalresulthigherdensityConclusions:quantitativeevaluationindicatesstableconsolidationachievedUndoubtedlyresorptionprocessincomplete12monthsevidencedmarkeddensificationsiteBoneUnionQualityFractureFixationMandibularHeadCompressionScrewsfixingmaterialcondyleinternalosteosynthesis

Similar Articles

Cited By