Acceptance and Factors Influencing Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine in a Romanian Population.

Tiberiu Constantin Ionescu, Bogdana Ioana Fetecau, Ana Giurgiuca, Catalina Tudose
Author Information
  1. Tiberiu Constantin Ionescu: Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania. ORCID
  2. Bogdana Ioana Fetecau: Department of Cardio-Thoracic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania. ORCID
  3. Ana Giurgiuca: Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
  4. Catalina Tudose: Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 020021 Bucharest, Romania.

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccination has been recognized as one of the most effective ways to overcome the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, the success of this effort relies on national vaccination programmes. In May 2021, we surveyed 1552 people from Romania to determine acceptance rates and factors influencing acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Of these, 39.2% of participants reported that they were vaccinated and 25.6% desired vaccination; nonetheless, 29.5% expressed opposition to vaccination. Concerning vaccination refusal, the top justification given by respondents is that the vaccine is insufficiently safe and there is a risk of serious side effects (84.4%). A higher rate of vaccination refusal was observed among female gender, younger age, and lower educational level. Refusal was also associated with unemployment, being in a relationship, and having a decrease in income during the pandemic. People who are constantly informed by specialized medical staff have a statistically significant higher vaccination rate, while people who choose to get information from friends, family, and co-workers have the strongest intention of avoiding the vaccine. Current levels of vaccine are insufficient to achieve herd immunity of 67%. It is mandatory to understand the aspects that define and establish confidence and to craft nationwide interventions appropriately.

Keywords

References

  1. Euro Surveill. 2020 Feb;25(5): [PMID: 32019636]
  2. J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 20;12(2): [PMID: 35207628]
  3. Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):225-228 [PMID: 33082575]
  4. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Mar 12;9(3): [PMID: 33808958]
  5. Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Dec 06;8(4): [PMID: 33291245]
  6. Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 30;12:664554 [PMID: 33995222]
  7. Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 20;11(11): [PMID: 34827540]
  8. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Oct 03;9(10): [PMID: 34696235]
  9. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Feb 11;10(2): [PMID: 35214736]
  10. Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):29 [PMID: 33397962]
  11. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;35(8):785-788 [PMID: 32808095]
  12. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jan 20;10(2): [PMID: 35214606]
  13. Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 10;9:644538 [PMID: 33643998]
  14. Sci Transl Med. 2020 Nov 4;12(568): [PMID: 33077678]
  15. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Oct 10;9(10): [PMID: 34696265]
  16. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb 05;9(2): [PMID: 33562894]
  17. Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 10;8:344 [PMID: 32766201]
  18. Brain Behav Immun. 2021 May;94:41-50 [PMID: 33713824]
  19. BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 15;22(1):104 [PMID: 35033030]
  20. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 2;11(8):e048025 [PMID: 34341047]
  21. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Dec 03;9(12): [PMID: 34960176]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 02;18(13): [PMID: 34281009]
  23. Vaccine. 2021 Feb 12;39(7):1080-1086 [PMID: 33461833]
  24. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 21;19(4): [PMID: 35206666]
  25. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Sep;26:100495 [PMID: 32838242]
  26. Lancet. 2020 Nov 21;396(10263):1614-1616 [PMID: 33159850]
  27. Vaccine. 2021 Apr 8;39(15):2024-2034 [PMID: 33722411]
  28. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 14;18(14): [PMID: 34299942]
  29. Psychol Health Med. 2021 Jan;26(1):1-12 [PMID: 32479113]
  30. JMIR Infodemiology. 2021 Nov 12;1(1):e32127 [PMID: 34841200]
  31. Psychosomatics. 1971 Nov-Dec;12(6):371-9 [PMID: 5172928]
  32. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jul 21;9(8): [PMID: 34451935]
  33. Infect Dis Rep. 2022 Feb 11;14(1):121-133 [PMID: 35200443]
  34. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 24;19(3): [PMID: 35162328]
  35. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 29;23(4):e28973 [PMID: 33872185]
  36. Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 17;9:813941 [PMID: 34976942]
  37. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 17;9(12): [PMID: 34946473]
  38. Immunity. 2020 May 19;52(5):737-741 [PMID: 32433946]
  39. Vaccine. 2018 Feb 1;36(6):779-787 [PMID: 29325822]
  40. J Pers Med. 2021 Dec 29;12(1): [PMID: 35055329]
  41. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Feb;1:100012 [PMID: 33954296]
  42. BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 28;21(1):818 [PMID: 33910558]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccinationvaccineCOVID-19acceptancerefusalpandemicpeoplehigherrateAcceptancerecognizedoneeffectivewaysovercomecurrentSARS-CoV-2HoweversuccesseffortreliesnationalprogrammesMay2021surveyed1552Romaniadetermineratesfactorsinfluencing392%participantsreportedvaccinated256%desirednonetheless295%expressedoppositionConcerningtopjustificationgivenrespondentsinsufficientlysaferiskserioussideeffects844%observedamongfemalegenderyoungeragelowereducationallevelRefusalalsoassociatedunemploymentrelationshipdecreaseincomePeopleconstantlyinformedspecializedmedicalstaffstatisticallysignificantchoosegetinformationfriendsfamilyco-workersstrongestintentionavoidingCurrentlevelsinsufficientachieveherdimmunity67%mandatoryunderstandaspectsdefineestablishconfidencecraftnationwideinterventionsappropriatelyFactorsInfluencingVaccineRomanianPopulationanxiety

Similar Articles

Cited By