Association between resident status and patients' experiences of primary care: a cross-sectional study in the Greater Bay Area, China.

JingLan Wu, RuQing Liu, Leiyu Shi, Lingling Zheng, Ning He, Ruwei Hu
Author Information
  1. JingLan Wu: Department of Health Management, Sun Yat-Sen University School of Public Health, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  2. RuQing Liu: Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Sun Yat-Sen University School of Public Health, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  3. Leiyu Shi: Department of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  4. Lingling Zheng: Global Health Research Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. ORCID
  5. Ning He: Department of Health Management, Sun Yat-Sen University School of Public Health, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  6. Ruwei Hu: Department of Health Management, Sun Yat-Sen University School of Public Health, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China huruwei@mail.sysu.edu.cn. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: patients' experiences are important part of health services quality research, but it's still unclear whether patients' experiences are influenced by resident status. This study aimed to evaluate the association between resident status and patients' primary care experiences with the focus on migrants vs local residents.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study using multistage cluster random sampling was conducted from September to November 2019. The data were analysed using general linear models.
SETTING: Six community health centres in Guangzhou, China.
PARTICIPANTS: 1568 patients aged 20 years or older.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: patients' primary care experiences were assessed using the Primary Care Assessment Tool. The 10 domains included in Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) refers to first contact-utilisation, first contact-access, ongoing care, coordination (referral), coordination (information), comprehensiveness (services available), comprehensiveness (services provided), family-centredness, community orientation and cultural competence from patient's perspective.
RESULTS: 1568 questionnaires were analysed. After adjusting for age, sex, education, annual family income, self-perceived health status, chronic condition, annual medical expenditure and medical insurance, the PCAT total scores of the migrants were significantly lower than those of local residents (β=-0.128; 95% CI -0.218 to -0.037). Migrants had significantly lower scores than local residents in first contact utilisation (β=-0.245; 95% CI -0.341 to -0.148), ongoing care (β=-0.175; 95% CI -0.292 to -0.059), family-centredness (β=-0.112; 95% CI -0.225 to 0.001), community orientation (β=-0.176; 95% CI -0.286 to -0.066) and cultural competence (β=-0.270; 95% CI -0.383 to -0.156), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Primary care experiences of migrants were significantly worse off than those of local residents, especially in terms of primary care utilisation, continuity and cultural competence. Given the wide disparity in primary care experiences between migrants and local residents, Chinese healthcare system reform should focus on improving quality of primary care services for migrants, overcoming language barriers and creating patient-centred primary care services.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):e0203645 [PMID: 30192873]
  2. Health Policy. 2019 Jun;123(6):532-537 [PMID: 30954282]
  3. Public Health Nurs. 2018 May;35(3):211-219 [PMID: 29424104]
  4. Ann Fam Med. 2020 Jan;18(1):24-29 [PMID: 31937529]
  5. J Fam Pract. 1996 Feb;42(2):119-22 [PMID: 8606300]
  6. BMJ. 2020 Sep 25;370:m3691 [PMID: 32978177]
  7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 10;15:371 [PMID: 26357948]
  8. Health Policy Plan. 1998 Sep;13(3):311-22 [PMID: 10187600]
  9. J Travel Med. 2017 Jul 1;24(4): [PMID: 28426114]
  10. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):108-13 [PMID: 21768584]
  11. Demography. 2004 May;41(2):363-84 [PMID: 15209045]
  12. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 16;10(10):e0140922 [PMID: 26474161]
  13. Front Public Health. 2017 Aug 21;5:213 [PMID: 28871278]
  14. Aten Primaria. 2020 Oct;52(8):588-590 [PMID: 32674867]
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 07;17(13): [PMID: 32646063]
  16. Int J Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;13(6):463-8 [PMID: 11769748]
  17. Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):1979-1988 [PMID: 32358993]
  18. Ann Fam Med. 2018 Sep;16(5):393-398 [PMID: 30201635]
  19. J Biosoc Sci. 2010 Nov;42(6):743-56 [PMID: 20584352]
  20. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 31;10(3):e0121269 [PMID: 25826616]
  21. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):e0169241 [PMID: 28056038]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 01;14(9): [PMID: 28862682]
  23. Int J Equity Health. 2015 Jul 31;14:60 [PMID: 26227113]
  24. Br Med Bull. 2017 Jan 1;121(1):5-18 [PMID: 28108435]
  25. Lancet Public Health. 2018 Jan;3(1):e13 [PMID: 29307381]
  26. Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Dec 1;95(12):850-852 [PMID: 29200527]
  27. Ann Fam Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;3(2):159-66 [PMID: 15798043]
  28. BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 3;20(1):1054 [PMID: 32620098]
  29. Lancet Public Health. 2018 Jun;3(6):e259 [PMID: 29804719]
  30. Public Health Rep. 2008 Mar-Apr;123(2):189-97 [PMID: 18457071]
  31. BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 21;18(1):8 [PMID: 30665379]
  32. J Pediatr Nurs. 2010 Oct;25(5):335-43 [PMID: 20816555]
  33. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 27;20(1):984 [PMID: 33109188]
  34. PLoS One. 2020 Mar 10;15(3):e0230034 [PMID: 32155199]
  35. Prim Care. 2019 Dec;46(4):549-560 [PMID: 31655751]
  36. BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Apr 29;15:76 [PMID: 24779564]
  37. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 02;16(a):335 [PMID: 27484465]
  38. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(38):e7719 [PMID: 28930820]
  39. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1560-1567 [PMID: 32222105]
  40. Soc Sci Med. 2009 Apr;68(8):1552-60 [PMID: 19246143]
  41. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):717 [PMID: 30223803]
  42. Int J Public Health. 2016 May;61(4):443-54 [PMID: 27032868]
  43. Int J Equity Health. 2018 Apr 27;17(1):51 [PMID: 29703206]
  44. BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 03;3(1): [PMID: 23293244]
  45. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):872 [PMID: 30458765]
  46. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:206709 [PMID: 25861619]
  47. J Travel Med. 2019 Feb 1;26(2): [PMID: 30346574]
  48. Milbank Q. 2006;84(1):111-33 [PMID: 16529570]
  49. Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Jun 1;97(6):415-422 [PMID: 31210679]
  50. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 28;19(1):197 [PMID: 30922381]
  51. BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):1039 [PMID: 32605605]
  52. BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 09;16:134 [PMID: 26452648]

MeSH Term

China
Cross-Sectional Studies
Humans
Primary Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0care-0primaryexperiencesβ=-095% CIhealthservicesmigrantslocalresidentsstatusqualitypatients'residentstudyusingcommunityPrimaryfirstculturalcompetencesignificantlyPatients'focuscross-sectionalanalysedChina1568CareAssessmentToolPCATongoingcoordinationcomprehensivenessfamily-centrednessorientationannualmedicalscoreslowerutilisationOBJECTIVES:importantpartresearchstillunclearwhetherinfluencedaimedevaluateassociationvsDESIGN:multistageclusterrandomsamplingconductedSeptemberNovember2019datagenerallinearmodelsSETTING:SixcentresGuangzhouPARTICIPANTS:patientsaged20yearsolderMAINOUTCOMEMEASURES:assessed10domainsincludedreferscontact-utilisationcontact-accessreferralinformationavailableprovidedpatient'sperspectiveRESULTS:questionnairesadjustingagesexeducationfamilyincomeself-perceivedchronicconditionexpenditureinsurancetotal128218037Migrantscontact2453411481752920591122250001176286066270383156respectivelyCONCLUSION:worseespeciallytermscontinuityGivenwidedisparityChinesehealthcaresystemreformimprovingovercominglanguagebarrierscreatingpatient-centredAssociationcare:GreaterBayAreapolicy

Similar Articles

Cited By