Consumers in the Face of COVID-19-Related Advertising: Threat or Boost Effect?

Michela Balconi, Martina Sansone, Laura Angioletti
Author Information
  1. Michela Balconi: International Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
  2. Martina Sansone: International Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
  3. Laura Angioletti: International Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the production of a vast amount of COVID-19-themed brand commercials, in an attempt to exploit the salience of the topic to reach more effectively the consumers. However, the literature has produced conflicting findings of the effectiveness of negative emotional contents in advertisings. The present study aims at exploring the effect of COVID-19-related contents on the hemodynamic brain correlates of the consumer approach or avoidance motivation. Twenty Italian participants were randomly assigned to two different groups that watched COVID-19-related or non-COVID-19-related commercials. The hemodynamic response [oxygenated (OHb) and deoxygenated hemoglobin modulations] within the left and right prefrontal cortices (PFC) was monitored with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) while brand commercials were presented, as the prefrontal lateralization was shown to be indicative of the attitude toward the brand and of the approach-avoidance motivation. First, the findings showed that the COVID-19-related contents were able to prompt emotional processing within the PFC to a higher extent compared to contents non-related to COVID-19. Moreover, the single-channel analysis revealed increased OHb activity of the left dorsolateral PFC compared to the left pars triangularis Broca's area in the group of participants that watched the COVID-19-related commercials, suggesting that the commercials may have driven participants to dedicate more attention toward the processing of the emotional components compared to the semantic meaning conveyed by the ad. To conclude, despite expressing unpleasant emotions, commercials referring to the highly emotional pandemic experience may benefit the advertising efficacy, increasing the capability to reach customers.

Keywords

References

  1. Neurosci Res. 2011 Nov;71(3):251-9 [PMID: 21840350]
  2. Biol Psychol. 2004 Oct;67(1-2):219-33 [PMID: 15130532]
  3. Health Promot Perspect. 2020 Jul 12;10(3):257-269 [PMID: 32802763]
  4. Biomed Opt Express. 2016 Sep 06;7(10):3882-3898 [PMID: 27867700]
  5. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Jun;20(3):536-550 [PMID: 32185623]
  6. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Feb;15(2):85-93 [PMID: 21167765]
  7. Psychol Mark. 2021 Aug 10;: [PMID: 34539052]
  8. Brain Res. 2008 Sep 10;1229:167-78 [PMID: 18656462]
  9. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59 [PMID: 7962581]
  10. Sleep Med. 2020 Nov;75:12-20 [PMID: 32853913]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(11): [PMID: 32532077]
  12. Behav Neurol. 2000;12(4):191-200 [PMID: 11568431]
  13. Emotion. 2005 Jun;5(2):200-207 [PMID: 15982085]
  14. Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1760-8 [PMID: 19786103]
  15. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 20;8(1):3341 [PMID: 29463928]
  16. Health Psychol. 2020 May;39(5):355-357 [PMID: 32202824]
  17. Food Secur. 2020 Aug 6;:1-9 [PMID: 32837661]
  18. Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 15;12:654360 [PMID: 34177707]
  19. Brain. 2009 Mar;132(Pt 3):617-27 [PMID: 18971202]
  20. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):1971 [PMID: 33479323]
  21. Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Apr 19;8(5):2583-2598 [PMID: 28663892]
  22. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):105-120 [PMID: 28450977]
  23. Brain Stimul. 2012 Jul;5(3):330-336 [PMID: 21782546]
  24. Neuroimage. 2019 May 1;191:367-379 [PMID: 30716460]
  25. Brain Behav. 2017 Apr 05;7(5):e00686 [PMID: 28523228]
  26. Cereb Cortex. 2014 Jun;24(6):1460-73 [PMID: 23382516]
  27. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Oct 14;9:399 [PMID: 26528131]
  28. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011 May;49(5):579-83 [PMID: 21327841]
  29. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Apr;112(4):713-9 [PMID: 11275545]
  30. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:553100 [PMID: 33101125]
  31. J Psychol. 2005 Mar;139(2):176-92 [PMID: 15844763]
  32. J Bus Res. 2020 Aug;116:176-182 [PMID: 32457556]
  33. Brain Sci. 2012 Mar 26;2(2):85-100 [PMID: 24962767]
  34. Brain Cogn. 2015 Apr;95:67-76 [PMID: 25721430]
  35. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jun;288:112954 [PMID: 32325383]
  36. Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920 [PMID: 32112714]
  37. Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar;111:229-240 [PMID: 29360519]
  38. Neuroimage. 2004 Mar;21(3):868-75 [PMID: 15006653]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0commercialsemotionalcontentsCOVID-19-relatedbrandparticipantsleftPFCcomparedCOVID-19pandemicreachfindingshemodynamicconsumermotivationwatchedOHbwithinprefrontalfNIRStowardprocessingmayadvertisingpromptedproductionvastamountCOVID-19-themedattemptexploitsaliencetopiceffectivelyconsumersHoweverliteratureproducedconflictingeffectivenessnegativeadvertisingspresentstudyaimsexploringeffectbraincorrelatesapproachavoidanceTwentyItalianrandomlyassignedtwodifferentgroupsnon-COVID-19-relatedresponse[oxygenateddeoxygenatedhemoglobinmodulations]rightcorticesmonitoredFunctionalNear-InfraredSpectroscopypresentedlateralizationshownindicativeattitudeapproach-avoidanceFirstshowedableprompthigherextentnon-relatedMoreoversingle-channelanalysisrevealedincreasedactivitydorsolateralparstriangularisBroca'sareagroupsuggestingdrivendedicateattentioncomponentssemanticmeaningconveyedadconcludedespiteexpressingunpleasantemotionsreferringhighlyexperiencebenefitefficacyincreasingcapabilitycustomersConsumersFaceCOVID-19-RelatedAdvertising:ThreatBoostEffect?COVID-19neuroscienceengagementneuromarketing

Similar Articles

Cited By