Digital planning of composite customized veneers using Digital Smile Design: Evaluation of its accuracy and manufacturing.

Luca Ortensi, Giancarlo Sigari, Giusy Rita Maria La Rosa, Agnese Ferri, Francesco Grande, Eugenio Pedullà
Author Information
  1. Luca Ortensi: Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
  2. Giancarlo Sigari: Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
  3. Giusy Rita Maria La Rosa: Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy. ORCID
  4. Agnese Ferri: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  5. Francesco Grande: Department of Prosthodontics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  6. Eugenio Pedullà: Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the production of customized composite veneers starting from a two-dimensional (2D) digital preview using the Digital Smile System (DSS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A photographic examination of 30 patients was performed by taking two digital pictures of the face and a digital preview through the DSS. Moreover, optical scans of the dental arches were obtained and the data were entered into a three-dimensional (3D) software to prepare a virtual preview. The standard tessellation language files were sent for production using CAD-CAM technology. The Friedman test, Bonferroni, and Dunn post hoc tests were used, comparing the linear measurements of the 2D and 3D plans and the final veneers (α = .05).
RESULTS: Significant differences emerged between the pictures and digital scans on the mesial-distal widths of the lateral incisors and canine. Linear measurements in the 2D plan were significantly different from those of the 3D plan, except for the height measures of incisors. No significant changes were found on comparing the parameters of the 2D and 3D plans with those of the final pieces.
CONCLUSIONS: The customized veneers were clinically adequate and similar to 2D and 3D plans, although significant differences emerged between the picture and digital scans as well as between the 2D and 3D plans.

Keywords

References

  1. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 May;99(5):333-9 [PMID: 18456043]
  2. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 May;89(5):453-61 [PMID: 12806322]
  3. J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Apr;44(4):261-290 [PMID: 28109024]
  4. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Jan;33(1):7-19 [PMID: 33336852]
  5. Adv Dent Res. 2013 Nov;25(1):46-8 [PMID: 24129817]
  6. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2012 Feb 10;4:9-16 [PMID: 23674920]
  7. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Mar;103(3):182-8 [PMID: 20188241]
  8. Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):29-38 [PMID: 21093034]
  9. Clin Case Rep. 2020 Jul 15;8(11):2172-2180 [PMID: 33235753]
  10. J Prosthet Dent. 1973 Apr;29(4):358-82 [PMID: 4570911]
  11. Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e100-21 [PMID: 20006379]
  12. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Dec;32(6):625-35 [PMID: 23057051]
  13. J Dent. 2019 Jul;86:102-109 [PMID: 31181242]
  14. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Mar;127(3):425-429 [PMID: 33317829]
  15. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Feb;137(2):160-9 [PMID: 16521381]
  16. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Apr;8(2):537-543 [PMID: 35362247]
  17. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):165 [PMID: 32503567]
  18. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(2):166-181 [PMID: 31061997]
  19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 16;16(24): [PMID: 31888225]
  20. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 May;30(3):173-179 [PMID: 29139209]
  21. Arch Oral Biol. 2021 Apr;124:105059 [PMID: 33508626]
  22. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(2):156-164 [PMID: 31061996]
  23. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jun;121(6):871-875 [PMID: 30885588]
  24. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):615-24 [PMID: 23695612]
  25. Dent J (Basel). 2019 Mar 28;7(2): [PMID: 30925698]

MeSH Term

Computer-Aided Design
Dental Prosthesis Design
Humans
Incisor
Smiling

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.02Ddigital3DveneerspreviewDigitalplanscustomizedcompositeusingSmilescansproductionSystemDSSpicturescomparingmeasurementsfinaldifferencesemergedincisorsplansignificantOBJECTIVES:studyaimedevaluatestartingtwo-dimensionalMATERIAL ANDMETHODS:photographicexamination30patientsperformedtakingtwofaceMoreoveropticaldentalarchesobtaineddataenteredthree-dimensionalsoftwarepreparevirtualstandardtessellationlanguagefilessentCAD-CAMtechnologyFriedmantestBonferroniDunnposthoctestsusedlinearα = 05RESULTS:Significantmesial-distalwidthslateralcanineLinearsignificantlydifferentexceptheightmeasureschangesfoundparameterspiecesCONCLUSIONS:clinicallyadequatesimilaralthoughpicturewellplanningDesign:Evaluationaccuracymanufacturingestheticrestoration

Similar Articles

Cited By