Modeling the effects of the governmental responses to COVID-19 on transit demand: The case of Athens, Greece.

Marios Giouroukelis, Stella Papagianni, Nellie Tzivellou, Eleni I Vlahogianni, John C Golias
Author Information
  1. Marios Giouroukelis: Department of Transportation Planning and Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 5 Iroon Polytechniou str, Athens 15 773, Greece.
  2. Stella Papagianni: Transport for Athens - OASA S.A., 15, Metsovou str, Athens 106 82, Greece.
  3. Nellie Tzivellou: Transport for Athens - OASA S.A., 15, Metsovou str, Athens 106 82, Greece.
  4. Eleni I Vlahogianni: Department of Transportation Planning and Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 5 Iroon Polytechniou str, Athens 15 773, Greece.
  5. John C Golias: Department of Transportation Planning and Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 5 Iroon Polytechniou str, Athens 15 773, Greece.

Abstract

Short-term demand forecasting is essential for the public transit system, allowing for effective operations planning. This is especially relevant in the highly uncertain environment created by the SARS‑CoV‑2 pandemic. In this paper, we attempt to develop accurate prediction models of transit ridership in Athens, Greece, using Autoregressive Fractional Integrated time series models enhanced with SARS‑CoV‑2-related exogenous variables. The selected exogenous variables are, from the one hand, the ratio of weekly SARS‑CoV‑2 infections over the infections 3 weeks before (capturing the dynamics of the pandemic, as a proxy for fear of transmitting the disease while commuting), and from the other hand, an index of the stringency of the government's SARS‑CoV‑2-related measures and regulations. The developed ARFIMAX models have been fitted separately on bus and metro ridership data and wield comparable and statistically significant results. In both models, the exogenous variables prove to be statistically significant and their values are intuitive, suggesting a linear interrelation between them and transit ridership.

Keywords

References

  1. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Jul;5(7):739-44 [PMID: 9678399]
  2. PLoS One. 2020 Jul 21;15(7):e0236464 [PMID: 32692753]
  3. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Sep;7:100212 [PMID: 34173468]
  4. Entropy (Basel). 2021 Oct 04;23(10): [PMID: 34682029]
  5. Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;104:693-695 [PMID: 33540130]
  6. J Transp Health. 2021 Sep;22:101135 [PMID: 34277349]
  7. Int J Forecast. 2022 Apr-Jun;38(2):439-452 [PMID: 33311822]
  8. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;21(19): [PMID: 34640894]
  9. J Public Trans. 2020 Jan;22(1):1-21 [PMID: 36118518]
  10. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1537-1545 [PMID: 32226353]
  11. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Jun;10:100366 [PMID: 36844006]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0transitmodelsridershipexogenousvariablesdemandSARS‑CoV‑2pandemicAthensGreeceFractionalSARS‑CoV‑2-relatedhandinfectionsARFIMAXstatisticallysignificantCOVID-19Short-termforecastingessentialpublicsystemallowingeffectiveoperationsplanningespeciallyrelevanthighlyuncertainenvironmentcreatedpaperattemptdevelopaccuratepredictionusingAutoregressiveIntegratedtimeseriesenhancedselectedoneratioweekly3 weekscapturingdynamicsproxyfeartransmittingdiseasecommutingindexstringencygovernment'smeasuresregulationsdevelopedfittedseparatelybusmetrodatawieldcomparableresultsprovevaluesintuitivesuggestinglinearinterrelationModelingeffectsgovernmentalresponsesdemand:caseForecastingintegrationTransit

Similar Articles

Cited By