The effect of FK506 (tacrolimus) loaded with collagen membrane and fibrin glue on promotion of nerve regeneration in a rat sciatic nerve traction injury model.

Jin-Hong Kim, Young-Jin Choi, Han-Ick Park, Kang-Min Ahn
Author Information
  1. Jin-Hong Kim: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
  2. Young-Jin Choi: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
  3. Han-Ick Park: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
  4. Kang-Min Ahn: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. ahnkangmin@hanmail.net. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injury is one of the most common injuries that might occur in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of FK506 loaded with collagen membrane and fibrin glue on the promotion of nerve regeneration after traction nerve injury in a rat model.
METHODS: Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups: group A (n = 10), a sham group whose sciatic nerve was exposed without any injury; and groups B (n = 10) and C (n = 10), which underwent traction nerve injury using 200 g of traction force for 1 min. The injured nerve in group C was covered with a collagen membrane soaked with FK506 (0.5 mg/0.1 mL) and fibrin glue. Functional analysis and microscopic evaluation were performed at 2 and 4 weeks after injury.
RESULTS: The sciatic function index was - 5.78 ± 3.07 for group A, - 20.69 ± 5.22 for group B, and - 12.01 ± 4.20 for group C at 2 weeks after injury. However, at 4 weeks, the sciatic function index was - 5.58 ± 2.45 for group A, - 19.69 ± 4.81 for group B, and - 11.95 ± 1.94 for group C. In both periods, statistically significant differences were found among the groups (p<0.017). Histomorphometric evaluation revealed improved nerve regeneration in group C compared to that in group B. However, no statistical differences in axonal density were found among the three groups (p < 0.017).
CONCLUSION: Localized FK506 with collagen membrane and fibrin glue could promote axonal regeneration in a rat model of traction nerve injury.

Keywords

References

  1. J Cell Biol. 1981 Apr;89(1):96-103 [PMID: 6164683]
  2. Neural Regen Res. 2018 Jul;13(7):1247-1252 [PMID: 30028334]
  3. Cytokine. 1992 Mar;4(2):151-60 [PMID: 1378764]
  4. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Jun;59(6):715 [PMID: 11381405]
  5. J Neurosci Methods. 2001 Jul 15;108(1):1-9 [PMID: 11459612]
  6. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1996 Apr;12(3):159-63 [PMID: 8726335]
  7. J Neurosci. 1995 May;15(5 Pt 2):4109-23 [PMID: 7751969]
  8. Acta Biomater. 2019 Sep 15;96:211-221 [PMID: 31141732]
  9. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;45(2):83-90 [PMID: 31106136]
  10. J Orthop Res. 2000 Jan;18(1):149-55 [PMID: 10716291]
  11. J Cell Sci. 1995 May;108 ( Pt 5):2037-51 [PMID: 7544801]
  12. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 Jun;289(3):1202-10 [PMID: 10336507]
  13. Science. 1986 Aug 15;233(4765):783-6 [PMID: 3738509]
  14. Exp Neurol. 2002 Feb;173(2):213-23 [PMID: 11822885]
  15. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;73(7):1328-40 [PMID: 25914133]
  16. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Dec;98(7):1264-71, discussion 1272-4 [PMID: 8942915]
  17. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 May;54(4):366-71 [PMID: 26922403]
  18. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Jan;83(1):129-38 [PMID: 2909054]
  19. Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Apr;52(4):407-13 [PMID: 15084888]
  20. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004 Dec 15;71(4):661-8 [PMID: 15505831]
  21. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Aug;282(2):1084-93 [PMID: 9262378]
  22. J Anat. 1999 Jan;194 ( Pt 1):1-14 [PMID: 10227662]
  23. J Periodontol. 2007 Jan;78(1):112-21 [PMID: 17199547]
  24. Brain. 1951 Dec;74(4):491-516 [PMID: 14895767]
  25. Prog Neurobiol. 2007 Jul;82(4):163-201 [PMID: 17643733]
  26. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Jun;124(6):641-4 [PMID: 11391254]
  27. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1993 Jan;9(1):69-74 [PMID: 8423563]
  28. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Sep;62(9):1125-30 [PMID: 15346365]
  29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3191-5 [PMID: 7512727]
  30. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Aug;118(2):360-7 [PMID: 16874203]
  31. J Neurosci. 1995 Apr;15(4):2985-94 [PMID: 7536825]
  32. J Biol Chem. 1995 Sep 1;270(35):20479-84 [PMID: 7657624]
  33. Nature. 1992 Aug 13;358(6387):584-7 [PMID: 1380130]
  34. Neurosci Lett. 2004 May 6;361(1-3):168-71 [PMID: 15135920]
  35. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Sep;63(9):1544-52 [PMID: 19828391]
  36. Neurosurg Focus. 2012 May;32(5):E5 [PMID: 22537131]
  37. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jun;127(6):2381-2390 [PMID: 21311390]
  38. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008 May;14(5):595-606 [PMID: 18399734]
  39. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;9(5):333-9 [PMID: 17875826]
  40. J Neurosci. 1995 Nov;15(11):7509-16 [PMID: 7472502]
  41. J Control Release. 2013 Mar 28;166(3):197-202 [PMID: 23306024]
  42. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;43(1):12 [PMID: 33934285]
  43. Brain Res. 2009 Feb 13;1254:10-7 [PMID: 19059220]
  44. J Biol Chem. 1990 Dec 5;265(34):21011-5 [PMID: 1701173]
  45. Muscle Nerve. 2019 Nov;60(5):613-620 [PMID: 31397908]
  46. Nature. 1989 Oct 26;341(6244):758-60 [PMID: 2477715]
  47. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2003;5:293-347 [PMID: 14527315]
  48. Neurosci Lett. 2012 Apr 11;514(1):96-101 [PMID: 22405891]
  49. J Med Syst. 2011 Oct;35(5):787-93 [PMID: 20703726]
  50. J Control Release. 2015 Oct 10;215:1-11 [PMID: 26226344]
  51. Transpl Int. 1997;10(1):13-8 [PMID: 9002146]
  52. Mol Endocrinol. 1994 Dec;8(12):1731-41 [PMID: 7708060]
  53. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Aug 26;42(1):29 [PMID: 32884927]
  54. Exp Neurol. 1982 Sep;77(3):634-43 [PMID: 7117467]
  55. Clin Mater. 1992;9(3-4):195-200 [PMID: 10149970]
  56. Cell. 1991 Aug 23;66(4):807-15 [PMID: 1715244]
  57. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2000;17(1):39-44 [PMID: 11490076]
  58. Neurosurg Focus. 2004 May 15;16(5):E1 [PMID: 15174821]
  59. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Aug;43(4):497-504 [PMID: 27194249]
  60. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1994 Jan 1;6(4):287-96 [PMID: 21551759]
  61. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Jun;103(7):1928-36 [PMID: 10359255]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nervegroupinjury-±FK506glueregenerationtractionCcollagenmembranefibrinsciaticB54ratmodeln=10groups12weekseffectloadedpromotionthree0evaluationfunctionindex2069Howeverdifferencesfoundamong017axonalBACKGROUND:PeripheralonecommoninjuriesmightoccuroralmaxillofacialsurgerypurposestudydetermineMETHODS:ThirtymaleSprague-Dawleyratsdividedgroups:shamwhoseexposedwithoutunderwentusing200gforcemininjuredcoveredsoakedmg/0mLFunctionalanalysismicroscopicperformedRESULTS:7830722120158451981119594periodsstatisticallysignificantp<0Histomorphometricrevealedimprovedcomparedstatisticaldensityp<CONCLUSION:LocalizedpromotetacrolimusCollagenFibrinNerveSciaticTraction

Similar Articles

Cited By