How, when, and why do inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work? A realist evaluation.

Justin Avery Aunger, Ross Millar, Anne Marie Rafferty, Russell Mannion, Joanne Greenhalgh, Deborah Faulks, Hugh McLeod
Author Information
  1. Justin Avery Aunger: School of Health Sciences, Surrey Research Park, Surrey, United Kingdom. ORCID
  2. Ross Millar: Health Services Management Centre, Park House, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  3. Anne Marie Rafferty: Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  4. Russell Mannion: Health Services Management Centre, Park House, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  5. Joanne Greenhalgh: Sociology and Social Policy Department, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  6. Deborah Faulks: Engaging Communities Solutions, Stafford, United Kingdom.
  7. Hugh McLeod: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol & NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inter-organisational collaborations (IOCs) in healthcare have been viewed as an effective approach to performance improvement. However, there remain gaps in our understanding of what helps IOCs function, as well as how and why contextual elements affect their implementation. A realist review of evidence drawing on 86 sources has sought to elicit and refine context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) to understand and refine these phenomena, yet further understanding can be gained from interviewing those involved in developing IOCs.
METHODS: We used a realist evaluation methodology, adopting prior realist synthesis findings as a theoretical framework that we sought to refine. We drew on 32 interviews taking place between January 2020 and May 2021 with 29 stakeholders comprising IOC case studies, service users, as well as regulatory perspectives in England. Using a retroductive analysis approach, we aimed to test CMOCs against these data to explore whether previously identified mechanisms, CMOCs, and causal links between them were affirmed, refuted, or revised, and refine our explanations of how and why interorganisational collaborations are successful.
RESULTS: Most of our prior CMOCs and their underlying mechanisms were supported in the interview findings with a diverse range of evidence. Leadership behaviours, including showing vulnerability and persuasiveness, acted to shape the core mechanisms of collaborative functioning. These included our prior mechanisms of trust, faith, and confidence, which were largely ratified with minor refinements. Action statements were formulated, translating theoretical findings into practical guidance.
CONCLUSION: As the fifth stage in a larger project, our refined theory provides a comprehensive understanding of the causal chain leading to effective collaborative inter-organisational relationships. These findings and recommendations can support implementation of IOCs in the UK and elsewhere. Future research should translate these findings into further practical guidance for implementers, researchers, and policymakers.

References

  1. BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 9;7(2):e011745 [PMID: 28183806]
  2. Implement Sci. 2016 Feb 09;11:17 [PMID: 26860631]
  3. Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 16;13(1):138 [PMID: 30442165]
  4. Healthc Manage Forum. 1995 Fall;8(3):24-35 [PMID: 10153375]
  5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 25;19(1):752 [PMID: 31653231]
  6. J Interprof Care. 2001 Nov;15(4):319-27 [PMID: 11725579]
  7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 16;15:196 [PMID: 26081845]
  8. J Integr Care (Brighton). 2018;26(4):296-308 [PMID: 30464724]
  9. Int J Integr Care. 2018 Jan 16;18(1):5 [PMID: 29632455]
  10. BMC Med. 2016 Jun 24;14(1):96 [PMID: 27342217]
  11. Health Info Libr J. 2004 Jun;21 Suppl 1:3-19 [PMID: 15186286]
  12. Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 16;10:49 [PMID: 25885787]
  13. Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 28;10:134 [PMID: 26415961]
  14. J Health Organ Manag. 2023 Aug 2;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print): [PMID: 37528603]
  15. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 26;21(1):602 [PMID: 34174873]
  16. BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;15:725 [PMID: 26223523]
  17. Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Jul;28(4):1199-1208 [PMID: 32052531]
  18. Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 22;10(1):82 [PMID: 33752755]
  19. Health Care Manage Rev. 1995 Winter;20(1):54-64 [PMID: 7744606]
  20. BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 19;21(1):753 [PMID: 33874927]

Grants

  1. NIHR127430/Department of Health

MeSH Term

Delivery of Health Care
Health Facilities
Leadership
Organizations
Trust

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0findingsIOCsrealistrefineCMOCsmechanismscollaborationsunderstandingpriorhealthcareeffectiveapproachwellimplementationevidencesoughtcanevaluationtheoreticalcausalcollaborativepracticalguidanceinter-organisationalBACKGROUND:Inter-organisationalviewedperformanceimprovementHoweverremaingapshelpsfunctioncontextualelementsaffectreviewdrawing86sourceselicitcontext-mechanism-outcomeconfigurationsunderstandphenomenayetgainedinterviewinginvolveddevelopingMETHODS:usedmethodologyadoptingsynthesisframeworkdrew32interviewstakingplaceJanuary2020May202129stakeholderscomprisingIOCcasestudiesserviceusersregulatoryperspectivesEnglandUsingretroductiveanalysisaimedtestdataexplorewhetherpreviouslyidentifiedlinksaffirmedrefutedrevisedexplanationsinterorganisationalsuccessfulRESULTS:underlyingsupportedinterviewdiverserangeLeadershipbehavioursincludingshowingvulnerabilitypersuasivenessactedshapecorefunctioningincludedtrustfaithconfidencelargelyratifiedminorrefinementsActionstatementsformulatedtranslatingCONCLUSION:fifthstagelargerprojectrefinedtheoryprovidescomprehensivechainleadingrelationshipsrecommendationssupportUKelsewhereFutureresearchtranslateimplementersresearcherspolicymakerswork?

Similar Articles

Cited By