Understanding Mental Health Professionals' Perspectives and Practices Regarding the Implementation of Digital Mental Health: Qualitative Study.

Cristina Mendes-Santos, Francisco Nunes, Elisabete Weiderpass, Rui Santana, Gerhard Andersson
Author Information
  1. Cristina Mendes-Santos: Department of Culture and Society, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. ORCID
  2. Francisco Nunes: Fraunhofer Portugal AICOS, Porto, Portugal. ORCID
  3. Elisabete Weiderpass: International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. ORCID
  4. Rui Santana: NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. ORCID
  5. Gerhard Andersson: Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the potential of digital mental health to provide cost-effective mental health care, its adoption in clinical settings is limited, and little is known about the perspectives and practices of mental health professionals regarding its implementation or the factors influencing these perspectives and practices.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize in depth the perspectives and practices of mental health professionals regarding the implementation of digital mental health and explore the factors affecting such perspectives and practices.
METHODS: A qualitative study using in-depth semistructured interviews with Portuguese mental health professionals (N=13)-psychologists and psychiatrists-was conducted. The transcribed interviews were thematically analyzed.
RESULTS: Mental health professionals deemed important or engaged in the following practices during the implementation of digital mental health: indication evaluation, therapeutic contract negotiation, digital psychological assessment, technology setup and management, and intervention delivery and follow-up. Low-threshold accessibility and professionals' perceived duty to provide support to their clients facilitated the implementation of digital mental health. Conversely, the lack of structured intervention frameworks; the unavailability of usable, validated, and affordable technology; and the absence of structured training programs inhibited digital mental health implementation by mental health professionals.
CONCLUSIONS: The publication of practice frameworks, development of evidence-based technology, and delivery of structured training seem key to expediting implementation and encouraging the sustained adoption of digital mental health by mental health professionals.

Keywords

References

  1. Internet Interv. 2019 Feb 10;17:100236 [PMID: 30949435]
  2. J Gen Psychol. 2013 Oct-Dec;140(4):282-93 [PMID: 24837821]
  3. Internet Interv. 2018 Apr 06;12:181-188 [PMID: 30135782]
  4. Cogn Behav Ther. 2012;41(3):230-40 [PMID: 22428582]
  5. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 20;8(2):e15935 [PMID: 32130167]
  6. Psychother Res. 2020 Nov;30(8):998-1010 [PMID: 32024447]
  7. Internet Interv. 2019 Oct 31;18:100290 [PMID: 31737491]
  8. Psychiatr Serv. 2017 May 1;68(5):427-429 [PMID: 28412890]
  9. J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 19;12(5):e74 [PMID: 21169177]
  10. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 11;10:993 [PMID: 32116819]
  11. JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Apr 6;7(4):e16817 [PMID: 32250273]
  12. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 05;15(9):e193 [PMID: 24007949]
  13. Psychother Res. 2018 Nov;28(6):909-924 [PMID: 28068875]
  14. Behav Sci Law. 2008;26(3):271-86 [PMID: 18548515]
  15. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 18;20(12):e11007 [PMID: 30563817]
  16. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 2;22(9):e20581 [PMID: 32876577]
  17. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Aug;38(1):4-17 [PMID: 19787305]
  18. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):851-864 [PMID: 32866459]
  19. Internet Interv. 2017 Jan 25;8:1-9 [PMID: 30135823]
  20. Depress Anxiety. 2020 Dec;37(12):1168-1178 [PMID: 32725848]
  21. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 May 30;12:25 [PMID: 29853991]
  22. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 10;36(23):2413-2421 [PMID: 29953304]
  23. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:157-79 [PMID: 26652054]
  24. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:877-902 [PMID: 25251483]
  25. Psychol Med. 2018 Nov;48(15):2456-2466 [PMID: 29540243]
  26. Psychol Med. 2015 Dec;45(16):3357-76 [PMID: 26235445]
  27. Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;64(7):465-470 [PMID: 31096757]
  28. Transl Behav Med. 2016 Jun;6(2):317-28 [PMID: 27357001]
  29. Internet Interv. 2018 Feb 06;11:60-70 [PMID: 30135761]
  30. J Clin Psychol. 2013 Jan;69(1):100-13 [PMID: 22975897]
  31. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 10;15(12):e280 [PMID: 24326065]
  32. J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:695-705 [PMID: 30611913]
  33. BMJ. 2020 Jun 29;369:m2541 [PMID: 32601049]
  34. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 05;17(21): [PMID: 33167478]
  35. Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;49:56-61 [PMID: 29366849]
  36. JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Apr 23;7(4):e17157 [PMID: 32324150]
  37. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57 [PMID: 17872937]
  38. Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):591-608 [PMID: 27670770]
  39. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 22;17(1):77 [PMID: 28222706]
  40. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 23;22(7):e17362 [PMID: 32706713]
  41. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;75(2):113-114 [PMID: 29238805]
  42. Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Jan;30(1):95-102 [PMID: 28927484]
  43. Internet Interv. 2018 Jan 16;12:150-164 [PMID: 30135779]
  44. Fam Pract. 2019 Jan 25;36(1):53-63 [PMID: 30188992]
  45. Psychol Med. 2016 Oct;46(13):2679-93 [PMID: 27649340]
  46. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 15;19(9):e306 [PMID: 28916506]
  47. J Telemed Telecare. 2019 Jan;25(1):59-63 [PMID: 28990454]
  48. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;17(20): [PMID: 33096650]
  49. J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 17;8(8): [PMID: 31426460]
  50. Cogn Behav Ther. 2018 Jan;47(1):1-18 [PMID: 29215315]
  51. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 24;20(4):e153 [PMID: 29691215]
  52. Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;8:553345 [PMID: 33313033]

Grants

  1. 001/World Health Organization

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mentalhealthdigitalprofessionalsimplementationpracticesperspectivestechnologyadoptionMentalstructuredprovideregardingfactorsstudyinterviewsinterventiondeliveryframeworkstrainingBACKGROUND:Despitepotentialcost-effectivecareclinicalsettingslimitedlittleknowninfluencingOBJECTIVE:aimscharacterizedepthexploreaffectingMETHODS:qualitativeusingin-depthsemistructuredPortugueseN=13-psychologistspsychiatrists-wasconductedtranscribedthematicallyanalyzedRESULTS:deemedimportantengagedfollowinghealth:indicationevaluationtherapeuticcontractnegotiationpsychologicalassessmentsetupmanagementfollow-upLow-thresholdaccessibilityprofessionals'perceiveddutysupportclientsfacilitatedConverselylackunavailabilityusablevalidatedaffordableabsenceprogramsinhibitedCONCLUSIONS:publicationpracticedevelopmentevidence-basedseemkeyexpeditingencouragingsustainedUnderstandingHealthProfessionals'PerspectivesPracticesRegardingImplementationDigitalHealth:QualitativeStudyEUEuropeanUnionPortugalbarriersdriversinternetinterventionspsychotherapyacceptance

Similar Articles

Cited By