Effect of environmental factors on blood counts of caught at Brantas River watershed, Indonesia.

Asus Maizar Suryanto Hertika, Diana Arfiati, Evellin Dewi Lusiana, Renanda B D S Putra
Author Information
  1. Asus Maizar Suryanto Hertika: Water Resource Management, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, 65144, Indonesia. ORCID
  2. Diana Arfiati: Water Resource Management, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, 65144, Indonesia.
  3. Evellin Dewi Lusiana: Water Resource Management, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, 65144, Indonesia.
  4. Renanda B D S Putra: Aquacultue PSDKU, universitas Brawijaya, Kediri, East Java, 64111, Indonesia.

Abstract

: Contamination of freshwater ecosystems has become a major issue as it threatens public water sources as well as aquatic life. It is important to predict changes in organism health, given a known number of environmental factors and pollutant concentrations, in order to better manage contaminants through biomarker analysis. This study aims to examine the ecosystem health of the Brantas River based on its environmental condition and the hematology profile of fish present in the river. This species was chosen because of its wide distribution along the Brantas River, and because it is very tolerant, adaptable, highly abundant, and easy to catch. : The study area included 10 sampling sites along the Brantas River watershed. In total, six water quality parameters were observed (temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), biological oxygen demand (BOD), ammonia concentration, and phenol concentration) and hematology measurements consisted of erythrocyte, leucocyte, and micronuclei analyses. : The results showed that the upstream area of Brantas River, located in Batu, was the least polluted region, while Mojokerto was the most polluted. The erythrocyte level of caught in most sampling sites was quite low. Furthermore, research revealed that the status of ' hematological profile was significantly correlated (p<0.05) with water quality parameters, particularly DO, BOD, ammonia, and phenol. : It can be concluded from these results that the hematological profile of the fish is poor due to high levels of organic waste and harmful substances.

Keywords

Associated Data

figshare | 10.6084/m9.figshare.16895227.v1

References

  1. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 3;13(12):e0208182 [PMID: 30507972]
  2. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 May 12;366(1569):1425-37 [PMID: 21444316]
  3. J Exp Biol. 2003 Jan;206(Pt 1):153-62 [PMID: 12456705]
  4. Water Res. 2020 Feb 1;169:115270 [PMID: 31731243]
  5. Front Physiol. 2010 Oct 04;1:134 [PMID: 21423375]
  6. F1000Res. 2021 Nov 17;10:1169 [PMID: 35419189]
  7. Front Vet Sci. 2021 Mar 30;8:616955 [PMID: 33860003]
  8. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003 Feb;13(2):57-149 [PMID: 21782649]
  9. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2019 Jun;45(3):997-1013 [PMID: 30715663]
  10. Molecules. 2020 Nov 17;25(22): [PMID: 33213001]
  11. Mar Pollut Bull. 2002;45(1-12):17-23 [PMID: 12398363]
  12. Exp Cell Res. 2018 Oct 15;371(2):353-363 [PMID: 30149001]
  13. Dev Reprod. 2019 Jun;23(2):139-148 [PMID: 31321354]
  14. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011 Feb;30(2):290-300 [PMID: 21072851]
  15. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2014 Jul;10(3):327-41 [PMID: 24574147]
  16. Front Physiol. 2014 Feb 28;5:84 [PMID: 24616707]
  17. Clin Lab Med. 2015 Sep;35(3):681-701 [PMID: 26297413]
  18. Aquat Toxicol. 2006 Jun 1;78 Suppl 1:S99-104 [PMID: 16603255]
  19. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2001;38(1):38-45 [PMID: 11473386]
  20. Environ Pollut. 2012 Apr;163:287-303 [PMID: 22306910]
  21. World J Methodol. 2015 Dec 26;5(4):216-22 [PMID: 26713282]
  22. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 1;733:137782 [PMID: 32209235]
  23. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015 Oct;120:295-302 [PMID: 26094035]
  24. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2014 Jun;7(2):60-72 [PMID: 26109881]
  25. Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 22;285(1885): [PMID: 30135169]
  26. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2019 Oct;227(2):e13299 [PMID: 31102432]
  27. Front Genet. 2013 Jul 11;4:131 [PMID: 23874352]
  28. Environ Pollut. 2008 Dec;156(3):974-9 [PMID: 18524439]
  29. J Environ Biol. 2007 Apr;28(2):177-9 [PMID: 17915746]
  30. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Sep;146(3):281-300 [PMID: 17560835]
  31. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Sep 1;563-564:273-81 [PMID: 27135591]
  32. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 13;17(4): [PMID: 32069998]
  33. Ital J Food Saf. 2015 Mar 11;4(1):4174 [PMID: 27800375]
  34. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1999 Aug;63(2):195-202 [PMID: 10441636]

MeSH Term

Ammonia
Animals
Cyprinodontiformes
Ecosystem
Environmental Monitoring
Indonesia
Phenol
Rivers

Chemicals

Phenol
Ammonia

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BrantasRiver:waterhealthenvironmentalprofilequalityfactorsbiomarkerstudyecosystemhematologyfishriveralongareasamplingsiteswatershedparametersoxygenDOBODammoniaconcentrationphenolerythrocyteresultspollutedcaughthematologicalbloodContaminationfreshwaterecosystemsbecomemajorissuethreatenspublicsourceswellaquaticlifeimportantpredictchangesorganismgivenknownnumberpollutantconcentrationsorderbettermanagecontaminantsanalysisaimsexaminebasedconditionpresentspecieschosenwidedistributiontolerantadaptablehighlyabundanteasycatchincluded10totalsixobservedtemperaturepHdissolvedbiologicaldemandmeasurementsconsistedleucocytemicronucleianalysesshowedupstreamlocatedBatuleastregionMojokertolevelquitelowFurthermoreresearchrevealedstatus'significantlycorrelatedp<005particularlycanconcludedpoorduehighlevelsorganicwasteharmfulsubstancesEffectcountsIndonesiaparameterpollution

Similar Articles

Cited By