Adolescent attachment to parents and peers in singletons and twins born with assisted and natural conception.

M S Flykt, M Prince, M Vänskä, J Lindblom, J Minkkinen, A Tiitinen, P Poikkeus, Z Biringen, R-L Punamäki
Author Information
  1. M S Flykt: Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. ORCID
  2. M Prince: Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. ORCID
  3. M Vänskä: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  4. J Lindblom: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  5. J Minkkinen: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland. ORCID
  6. A Tiitinen: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. ORCID
  7. P Poikkeus: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  8. Z Biringen: Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  9. R-L Punamäki: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Does adolescent attachment to parents and peers differ between singletons and twins born with ART or natural conception (NC)?
SUMMARY ANSWER: Adolescent attachment anxiety with the father was higher among NC singletons than among ART and NC twins, whereas attachment avoidance with the father was higher in ART singletons than in NC singletons and NC twins. No differences were found in attachment to the mother, best friend or romantic partner.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Most studies have not found differences between ART and NC singletons in parent-adolescent relationships, but twin relationships may be more at risk. No previous study has examined all four groups in the same study, or specifically looked at attachment relationships.
STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This was an 18-year, prospective and controlled longitudinal study with families of 496 ART singletons, 101 ART twin pairs, 476 NC singletons and 22 NC twin pairs. Families were recruited during the second trimester of pregnancy; the ART group was recruited from five infertility clinics in Finland and the control group was recruited from a hospital outpatient clinic during a routine visit.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Mothers and fathers gave background information for this study during pregnancy, and during the child's first year and early school age (7-8 years). For the ART group, infertility characteristics and prenatal medical information was also obtained from the patient registry of the infertility clinics. Children (originally 50% girls) filled in electronic questionnaires related to their attachment to mother, father, best friend and romantic partner () at 17-19 years of age.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Adolescent attachment anxiety to father was higher in NC singletons than in ART twins,  = 0.004 and marginally higher than in NC twins,  = 0.06. Adolescent attachment avoidance to father was higher in ART singletons than in NC singletons,  = 0.006 and marginally higher than in NC twins,  = 0.055.
LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample size was small especially in the NC twin group and there was drop-out over the 18-year time period, especially among boys and families with lower parental education level. The study only included native Finnish-speaking families. The results could differ in a more diverse population. ART singletons were younger and had fewer siblings than ART twins and NC children, and ART and NC twins had more newborn health risks than ART and NC singletons.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The study adds to a growing body of evidence that neither ART treatments nor being a twin places mother-child relationships or peer relationships at long-term risk. However, in our study, which was the first to examine both ART and twinhood simultaneously, we found that there may be more problems in father-adolescent relationships, but only in ART singletons and only related to attachment avoidance. Our findings suggest that men, as well as women, should receive enough support in pre- and peri-natal health care during and after infertility treatments.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was funded by Academy of Finland (grant number 2501308988), the Juho Vainio Foundation and the Finnish Cultural Foundation. The authors report no conflict of interest.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Keywords

References

  1. J Adv Nurs. 1999 Jul;30(1):200-10 [PMID: 10403997]
  2. Asian J Androl. 2012 Jan;14(1):121-9 [PMID: 22179515]
  3. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;55(9):1033-41 [PMID: 24256475]
  4. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;41(8):1015-23 [PMID: 11099118]
  5. Hum Reprod. 2016 Dec;31(12):2765-2771 [PMID: 27744378]
  6. Attach Hum Dev. 2014;16(1):58-76 [PMID: 24215182]
  7. Fertil Steril. 2005 Sep;84(3):725-33 [PMID: 16169409]
  8. J Pers. 2011 Oct;79(5):965-91 [PMID: 21204839]
  9. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009 Jun;12(2):63-72 [PMID: 19802956]
  10. Hum Reprod. 2009 Feb;24(2):367-77 [PMID: 19043082]
  11. J Adolesc. 2009 Aug;32(4):835-48 [PMID: 19010525]
  12. Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 02;12:761864 [PMID: 34925164]
  13. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(1):87-94 [PMID: 21645954]
  14. Acta Paediatr. 2011 Feb;100(2):279-83 [PMID: 20726849]
  15. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Sep;27(3):236-43 [PMID: 23876974]
  16. Psychol Assess. 2011 Sep;23(3):615-25 [PMID: 21443364]
  17. Psychol Methods. 2019 Feb;24(1):1-19 [PMID: 30265048]
  18. Behav Res Ther. 2017 Nov;98:4-18 [PMID: 27890222]
  19. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;46(6):612-30 [PMID: 15877767]
  20. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 21;9:266 [PMID: 26052276]
  21. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Mar;38(3):308-16 [PMID: 22357709]
  22. Psychol Methods. 2018 Jun;23(2):298-317 [PMID: 28557466]
  23. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jun;97(6):727-733 [PMID: 29350747]
  24. Dev Psychol. 2001 Jan;37(1):86-100 [PMID: 11206436]
  25. Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb 18;36(3):702-711 [PMID: 33394012]
  26. Psychother Res. 2017 Jul;27(4):425-436 [PMID: 26686878]
  27. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006 Feb;9(1):95-102 [PMID: 16611474]
  28. Attach Hum Dev. 2007 Jun;9(2):127-38 [PMID: 17508313]
  29. Dev Psychol. 2004 Nov;40(6):1133-47 [PMID: 15535762]
  30. Psychol Methods. 2011 Jun;16(2):149-65 [PMID: 21517179]
  31. Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2303-12 [PMID: 27609986]
  32. Twin Res. 2003 Apr;6(2):106-18 [PMID: 12723997]
  33. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Feb;78(2):350-65 [PMID: 10707340]
  34. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Jul;13(1):135-44 [PMID: 16820125]
  35. Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Jan-Feb;21(1):84-96 [PMID: 25281685]
  36. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jan;90(1):78-93 [PMID: 16448311]
  37. BMC Public Health. 2015 Nov 25;15:1175 [PMID: 26607065]
  38. Fam Process. 2017 Dec;56(4):997-1011 [PMID: 27718223]
  39. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Sep 07;9(9): [PMID: 34574948]
  40. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006 Apr;9(2):240-9 [PMID: 16611494]
  41. J Fam Psychol. 2014 Apr;28(2):148-59 [PMID: 24588604]
  42. Springerplus. 2013 May 14;2(1):222 [PMID: 23853744]
  43. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Nov;31(11):1524-36 [PMID: 16207771]
  44. Hum Reprod. 2005 Nov;20(11):3238-47 [PMID: 16037103]
  45. Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):3118-25 [PMID: 23892321]
  46. J Fam Psychol. 2015 Aug;29(4):558-67 [PMID: 26168266]
  47. BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 28;5(10):e009426 [PMID: 26510732]
  48. Hum Reprod. 2008 Dec;23(12):2724-30 [PMID: 18753143]
  49. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2007 Fall;(117):57-72 [PMID: 17876788]
  50. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;44(3):342-55 [PMID: 12635965]
  51. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2017 Apr;35(2):150-158 [PMID: 29517356]
  52. Fertil Steril. 2004 Mar;81(3):505-11 [PMID: 15037391]
  53. Fertil Steril. 2015 Aug;104(2):260-6 [PMID: 26048155]
  54. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Aug;61(2):226-44 [PMID: 1920064]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ARTNCsingletonsattachmenttwinsstudyhigherrelationshipsfathertwininfertilityAdolescentgroup = 0parentspeersamongavoidancefoundfamiliesrecruiteddifferbornnaturalconceptionanxietydifferencesmotherbestfriendromanticpartnermayriskSTUDY18-yearpairspregnancyclinicsFinlandinformationfirstagerelatedTHEOFmarginallyespeciallyhealthtreatmentsFoundationassistedSTUDYQUESTION:adolescent?SUMMARYANSWER:whereasWHATISKNOWNALREADY:studiesparent-adolescentpreviousexaminedfourgroupsspecificallylookedDESIGNSIZEDURATION:prospectivecontrolledlongitudinal49610147622FamiliessecondtrimesterfivecontrolhospitaloutpatientclinicroutinevisitPARTICIPANTS/MATERIALSSETTINGMETHODS:Mothersfathersgavebackgroundchild'syearearlyschool7-8 yearscharacteristicsprenatalmedicalalsoobtainedpatientregistryChildrenoriginally50%girlsfilledelectronicquestionnaires17-19 yearsMAINRESULTSANDROLECHANCE:00406006055LIMITATIONSREASONSFORCAUTION:samplesizesmalldrop-outtimeperiodboyslowerparentaleducationlevelincludednativeFinnish-speakingresultsdiversepopulationyoungerfewersiblingschildrennewbornrisksWIDERIMPLICATIONSFINDINGS:addsgrowingbodyevidenceneitherplacesmother-childpeerlong-termHoweverexaminetwinhoodsimultaneouslyproblemsfather-adolescentfindingssuggestmenwellwomenreceiveenoughsupportpre-peri-natalcareFUNDING/COMPETINGINTERESTS:fundedAcademygrantnumber2501308988JuhoVainioFinnishCulturalauthorsreportconflictinterestTRIALREGISTRATIONNUMBER:N/Aadolescencereproductivetreatmentrelationship

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.