Graduate medical education-led continuous assessment of burnout and learning environments to improve residents' wellbeing.

Dotun Ogunyemi, Ali Ghassan Darwish, Gregory Young, Erica Cyr, Carol Lee, Sarkis Arabian, Kedar Challakere, Tommy Lee, Shirley Wong, Niren Raval
Author Information
  1. Dotun Ogunyemi: Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA. dogunye@outlook.com.
  2. Ali Ghassan Darwish: Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA.
  3. Gregory Young: Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA.
  4. Erica Cyr: Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA.
  5. Carol Lee: Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA.
  6. Sarkis Arabian: Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA.
  7. Kedar Challakere: Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA.
  8. Tommy Lee: Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA.
  9. Shirley Wong: Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA.
  10. Niren Raval: Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, CA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Promoting residents' wellbeing and decreasing burnout is a focus of Graduate Medical Education (GME). A supportive clinical learning environment is required to optimize residents' wellness and learning.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if longitudinal assessments of burnout and learning environment as perceived by residents combined with applying continuous quality Model for Improvement and serial Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles to test interventions would improve residents' burnout.
METHODS: From November 2017 to January 2020, 271 GME residents in internal medicine, general surgery, psychiatry, emergency medicine, family medicine and obstetrics and gynecology, were assessed over five cycles by Maslach burnout Inventory (MBI), and by clinical learning environment factors (which included personal/social relationships, self-defined burnout, program burnout support, program back-up support, clinical supervision by faculty, and sleep difficulties). The results of the MBI and clinical learning environment factors were observed and analyzed to determine and develop indicated Institutional and individual program interventions using a Plan, Do, Study, Act process with each of the five cycles.
RESULTS: The response rate was 78.34%. MBI parameters for all GME residents improved over time but were not statistically significant. Residents' positive perception of the clinical supervision by faculty was significantly and independently associated with improved MBI scores, while residents' self-defined burnout; and impaired personal relations perceptions were independently significantly associated with adverse MBI scores on liner regression. For all GME, significant improvements improved over time in residents' perception of impaired personal relationships (p < 0.001), self-defined burnout (p = 0.013), program burn-out support (p = 0.002) and program back-up support (p = 0.028). For the Internal Medicine Residency program, there were statistically significant improvements in all three MBI factors (p < 0.001) and in clinical learning environment measures (p = 0.006 to < 0.001). Interventions introduced during the PDSA cycles included organization-directed interventions (such as: faculty and administrative leadership recruitment, workflow interventions and residents' schedule optimization), and individual interventions (such as: selfcare, mentoring and resilience training).
CONCLUSION: In our study, for all GME residents, clinical learning environment factors in contrast to MBI factors showed significant improvements. Residents' positive perception of the clinical learning environment was associated with improved burnout measures. Residents in separate programs responded differently with one program reaching significance in all MBI and clinical learning environment factors measured. Continuous wellbeing assessment of all GME residents and introduction of Institutional and individual program interventions was accomplished.

References

  1. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Jul 26;8:513-523 [PMID: 28794665]
  2. Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):132-49 [PMID: 26695473]
  3. Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;70(6):891-897 [PMID: 28826752]
  4. Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2272-2281 [PMID: 27692469]
  5. JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1131-1150 [PMID: 30326495]
  6. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019 Sep 26;3(4):384-408 [PMID: 31993558]
  7. J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Feb;12(1):46-50 [PMID: 32089793]
  8. J Grad Med Educ. 2009 Dec;1(2):225-30 [PMID: 21975983]
  9. Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Apr;7(2):120-125 [PMID: 29476425]
  10. West J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb 21;21(2):412-422 [PMID: 32191199]
  11. Neurology. 2017 Feb 21;88(8):797-808 [PMID: 28122905]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 26;16(9): [PMID: 31027333]
  13. MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Nov 06;13:10651 [PMID: 30800852]
  14. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):245 [PMID: 31277615]
  15. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):437 [PMID: 31775717]
  16. Acad Med. 2018 Jul;93(7):966-968 [PMID: 29668521]
  17. Acad Med. 2006 Jan;81(1):82-5 [PMID: 16377826]
  18. CMAJ Open. 2021 Mar 8;9(1):E189-E200 [PMID: 33688027]
  19. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422 [PMID: 11148311]
  20. Heliyon. 2021 Jun 08;7(6):e07238 [PMID: 34189297]
  21. J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Oct;9(5):600-604 [PMID: 29075380]
  22. AEM Educ Train. 2018 Dec 20;3(1):14-19 [PMID: 30680343]
  23. Pediatrics. 2017 Feb;139(2): [PMID: 28123045]
  24. Cureus. 2019 Jun 3;11(6):e4805 [PMID: 31404361]
  25. J Grad Med Educ. 2009 Dec;1(2):236-42 [PMID: 21975985]
  26. JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1114-1130 [PMID: 30422299]
  27. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):195-205 [PMID: 27918798]
  28. Med Educ. 2021 Jan;55(1):72-81 [PMID: 32790930]
  29. Acad Pathol. 2019 Jun 10;6:2374289519851233 [PMID: 31218250]
  30. Children (Basel). 2018 Apr 23;5(4): [PMID: 29690631]

MeSH Term

Burnout, Professional
Burnout, Psychological
Education, Medical, Graduate
Emergency Medicine
Humans
Internship and Residency
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0learningburnoutclinicalenvironmentMBIprogramresidents'GMEinterventionsfactorsresidentscyclessupportimprovedsignificantp = 0wellbeingmedicineself-definedfacultyindividualperceptionassociatedimprovements001GraduatedeterminecontinuousPlanStudyActPDSAimprovefiveincludedrelationshipsback-upsupervisionInstitutionaltimestatisticallyResidents'positivesignificantlyindependentlyscoresimpairedpersonalp < 0measuresas:assessmentBACKGROUND:PromotingdecreasingfocusMedicalEducationsupportiverequiredoptimizewellnessOBJECTIVE:longitudinalassessmentsperceivedcombinedapplyingqualityModelImprovementserialtestMETHODS:November2017January2020271internalgeneralsurgerypsychiatryemergencyfamilyobstetricsgynecologyassessedMaslachBurnoutInventorypersonal/socialsleepdifficultiesresultsobservedanalyzeddevelopindicatedusingprocessRESULTS:responserate7834%parametersrelationsperceptionsadverselinerregression013burn-out002028InternalMedicineResidencythree006to < 0Interventionsintroducedorganization-directedadministrativeleadershiprecruitmentworkflowscheduleoptimizationselfcarementoringresiliencetrainingCONCLUSION:studycontrastshowedResidentsseparateprogramsrespondeddifferentlyonereachingsignificancemeasuredContinuousintroductionaccomplishedmedicaleducation-ledenvironments

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)