Automaticity and Executive Abilities in Developmental Dyslexia: A Theoretical Review.

James H Smith-Spark, Rebecca Gordon
Author Information
  1. James H Smith-Spark: Division of Psychology, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, UK. ORCID
  2. Rebecca Gordon: Department of Psychology and Human Development, Institute of Education, University College London, London WC1H 0AA, UK. ORCID

Abstract

Cognitive difficulties are well documented in developmental dyslexia but they present a challenge to dyslexia theory. In this paper, the Model of the Control of Action is proposed as a theoretical explanation of how and why deficits in both automaticity and executive abilities are apparent in the cognitive profiles of dyslexia and how these deficits might relate to literacy difficulties. This theoretical perspective is used to consider evidence from different cognitive domains. The neuroanatomical underpinnings of automaticity and executive abilities are then discussed in relation to the understanding of dyslexia. Links between reading, writing, and executive function are considered. The reviewed evidence suggests that dyslexia theory should consider an interaction between procedural learned behaviour (automaticity) and higher-order (executive) abilities. The capacity to handle environmental interference, develop and engage adaptive strategies accordingly, and plan actions all require interactions between the cerebellum and the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Difficulties in these areas might explain both impairments in the cumulative development of literacy skills in childhood and general task management in everyday life in adulthood. It is suggested that improved measures are required to assess this cerebellar-PFC interaction and to allow early identification of future literacy difficulties, allowing implementation of timely interventions and reasonable adjustments.

Keywords

References

  1. Cortex. 2000 Feb;36(1):109-23 [PMID: 10728901]
  2. Ann Dyslexia. 2008 Jun;58(1):81-95 [PMID: 18483868]
  3. Ann Dyslexia. 2009 Jun;59(1):12-33 [PMID: 19308736]
  4. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1996 Jan;37(1):51-87 [PMID: 8655658]
  5. Cogn Psychol. 2003 Jun;46(4):361-413 [PMID: 12809680]
  6. Neuropsychologia. 1990;28(3):271-8 [PMID: 2325839]
  7. Dev Neuropsychol. 2006;29(1):161-73 [PMID: 16390292]
  8. Cerebellum. 2013 Apr;12(2):267-76 [PMID: 22851215]
  9. Work. 2010;36(4):371-2 [PMID: 20714091]
  10. Dyslexia. 2017 Aug;23(3):234-250 [PMID: 28493359]
  11. Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt A):1-12 [PMID: 27671485]
  12. Child Dev. 2010 Nov-Dec;81(6):1641-60 [PMID: 21077853]
  13. Cerebellum. 2012 Jun;11(2):505-25 [PMID: 22068584]
  14. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008 Jul;30(5):588-606 [PMID: 18569253]
  15. Exp Brain Res. 2018 Nov;236(11):2991-3001 [PMID: 30116863]
  16. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(12):2144-55 [PMID: 12208010]
  17. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Oct;15(10):453-9 [PMID: 21889391]
  18. Dyslexia. 2004 Aug;10(3):196-214 [PMID: 15341198]
  19. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008 Sep;17(5):251-6 [PMID: 18755402]
  20. Neuroimage Clin. 2015 Mar 28;8:408-21 [PMID: 26106566]
  21. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Aug;21(8):1761-70 [PMID: 21139077]
  22. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 May 20;8:92 [PMID: 24904314]
  23. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jan 23;259(1354):43-7 [PMID: 7700875]
  24. Exp Brain Res. 2003 Nov;153(2):239-45 [PMID: 12955381]
  25. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004 Oct;26(7):874-90 [PMID: 15742539]
  26. Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1662-7 [PMID: 10335786]
  27. Br J Psychol. 1983 Aug;74 (Pt 3):311-42 [PMID: 6616125]
  28. Lancet. 1998 Jun 20;351(9119):1849-52 [PMID: 9652669]
  29. Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81-97 [PMID: 13310704]
  30. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68 [PMID: 23020641]
  31. Science. 2001 Mar 16;291(5511):2165-7 [PMID: 11251124]
  32. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 07;8:120 [PMID: 24639640]
  33. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Jul;21(4):996-1007 [PMID: 7673871]
  34. Memory. 2007 Jan;15(1):34-56 [PMID: 17479923]
  35. Cognition. 1990 May;35(2):159-82 [PMID: 2354611]
  36. Can J Occup Ther. 2013 Jun;80(3):131-40 [PMID: 24224226]
  37. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):417-423 [PMID: 11058819]
  38. J Learn Disabil. 1984 Apr;17(4):218-21 [PMID: 6716006]
  39. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):641-57 [PMID: 11757873]
  40. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jul;137(3):335-44 [PMID: 21549334]
  41. Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100 [PMID: 10945922]
  42. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Nov;12(11):418-24 [PMID: 18799345]
  43. J Sch Psychol. 2008 Feb;46(1):1-21 [PMID: 18438452]
  44. Neuropsychology. 1999 Jan;13(1):103-10 [PMID: 10067781]
  45. J Gerontol. 1994 Nov;49(6):P276-82 [PMID: 7963283]
  46. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Jan;48:22-34 [PMID: 25446951]
  47. Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Jun-Jul;53-54:323-41 [PMID: 26970859]
  48. Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Jul;32(5):816-835 [PMID: 28826299]
  49. Brain. 2012 Jul;135(Pt 7):2202-14 [PMID: 22669082]
  50. Brain Cogn. 1989 Nov;11(2):275-93 [PMID: 2803764]
  51. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jan;8(1):12-7 [PMID: 14697398]
  52. Dyslexia. 2021 May;27(2):153-167 [PMID: 33594786]
  53. J Learn Disabil. 2010 Sep-Oct;43(5):441-54 [PMID: 20375294]
  54. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Apr 19;372(1718): [PMID: 28242727]
  55. Physiol Rev. 1992 Oct;72(4):967-1017 [PMID: 1438583]
  56. Res Dev Disabil. 2019 May;88:42-52 [PMID: 30851482]
  57. Dev Neuropsychol. 2006;29(1):175-96 [PMID: 16390293]
  58. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(8):2258-71 [PMID: 21315748]
  59. Cerebellum. 2007;6(3):184-92 [PMID: 17786814]
  60. Dyslexia. 2005 May;11(2):116-31 [PMID: 15918370]
  61. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Jun 25;298(1089):199-209 [PMID: 6125971]
  62. Neuropsychologia. 1991;29(12):1241-9 [PMID: 1791934]
  63. Br J Psychol. 2007 Feb;98(Pt 1):79-92 [PMID: 17227613]
  64. Trends Neurosci. 1997 Apr;20(4):147-52 [PMID: 9106353]
  65. Brain. 2003 Feb;126(Pt 2):482-94 [PMID: 12538414]
  66. Cognition. 2015 Nov;144:1-13 [PMID: 26209910]
  67. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:1-29 [PMID: 21961947]
  68. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000 Feb;22(1):40-55 [PMID: 10649544]
  69. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016 Apr;37:1-6 [PMID: 26687618]
  70. Cortex. 2013 Mar;49(3):837-49 [PMID: 22699024]
  71. Cortex. 1995 Mar;31(1):87-97 [PMID: 7781322]
  72. J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 1;26(9):2424-33 [PMID: 16510720]
  73. Brain. 1991 Apr;114 ( Pt 2):727-41 [PMID: 2043945]
  74. Top Cogn Sci. 2010 Oct;2(4):614-30 [PMID: 25164046]
  75. Acta Paedopsychiatr. 1983 May;49(1-2):73-82 [PMID: 6349247]
  76. Pediatr Rehabil. 2001 Jul-Sep;4(3):119-36 [PMID: 11831564]
  77. Brain. 1999 Oct;122 ( Pt 10):1901-17 [PMID: 10506092]
  78. Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 23;12:708863 [PMID: 34497563]
  79. Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Feb-Mar;49-50:34-46 [PMID: 26649894]
  80. Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jun;47(7):1660-9 [PMID: 19397861]
  81. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202 [PMID: 11283309]
  82. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(1):108-14 [PMID: 12427569]
  83. Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 04;5:1308 [PMID: 25538638]
  84. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;23(2):201-16 [PMID: 18096360]
  85. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Dec 1;5(12):525-532 [PMID: 11728910]
  86. Cereb Cortex. 2001 Feb;11(2):148-57 [PMID: 11208669]
  87. Br J Educ Psychol. 2014 Jun;84(Pt 2):177-93 [PMID: 24829117]
  88. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 29;351(1346):1405-11; discussion 1411-2 [PMID: 8941952]
  89. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:401-33 [PMID: 11752491]
  90. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2000 Jun 1;17(4):297-338 [PMID: 20945185]
  91. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):339-54 [PMID: 15355143]
  92. Front Psychol. 2018 May 28;9:795 [PMID: 29892245]
  93. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004 Feb;26(1):31-42 [PMID: 14972692]
  94. Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):640-8 [PMID: 17950764]
  95. Dyslexia. 2016 Aug;22(3):245-62 [PMID: 27121331]
  96. Br J Dev Psychol. 2010 Mar;28(Pt 1):133-76 [PMID: 20306629]
  97. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;45(1):2-40 [PMID: 14959801]
  98. J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 May;115(1):188-97 [PMID: 23403228]
  99. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Dec;167(3):370-80 [PMID: 16044303]
  100. Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Mar;62:247-258 [PMID: 28089431]
  101. Cognition. 2010 Jan;114(1):29-41 [PMID: 19793584]
  102. Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 17;10:2725 [PMID: 31920790]
  103. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2013;2(2):104-15 [PMID: 23848244]
  104. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;21(1):8-14 [PMID: 22773897]
  105. Neuropsychology. 2010 Mar;24(2):222-243 [PMID: 20230116]
  106. Read Writ. 2015;28(7):989-1011 [PMID: 26190902]
  107. J Learn Disabil. 1999 May-Jun;32(3):256-66 [PMID: 15508245]
  108. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1998 Nov;51(4):819-52 [PMID: 9854442]
  109. Memory. 2013;21(2):189-209 [PMID: 22928929]
  110. Child Neuropsychol. 2003 Sep;9(3):208-20 [PMID: 13680410]
  111. Brain Lang. 2001 Feb;76(2):81-110 [PMID: 11254251]
  112. J Learn Disabil. 2007 Jul-Aug;40(4):306-18 [PMID: 17713130]
  113. Dev Neuropsychol. 2011;36(2):199-213 [PMID: 21347921]
  114. J Learn Disabil. 1993 Nov;26(9):597-609 [PMID: 8283130]
  115. Child Dev. 1977 Mar;48(1):55-60 [PMID: 844361]
  116. Cortex. 2017 Jan;86:186-204 [PMID: 27251123]
  117. Arch Med Res. 2000 Sep-Oct;31(5):493-6 [PMID: 11179583]
  118. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001 Oct;43(10):685-91 [PMID: 11665825]
  119. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jan;61(1):129-41 [PMID: 18038344]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0dyslexiaexecutivedifficultiesautomaticityabilitiesliteracydevelopmentaltheoryModelControlActiontheoreticaldeficitscognitivemightconsiderevidencefunctioninteractioncerebellumprefrontalcortexmemoryCognitivewelldocumentedpresentchallengepaperproposedexplanationapparentprofilesrelateperspectiveuseddifferentdomainsneuroanatomicalunderpinningsdiscussedrelationunderstandingLinksreadingwritingconsideredreviewedsuggestsprocedurallearnedbehaviourhigher-ordercapacityhandleenvironmentalinterferencedevelopengageadaptivestrategiesaccordinglyplanactionsrequireinteractionsPFCDifficultiesareasexplainimpairmentscumulativedevelopmentskillschildhoodgeneraltaskmanagementeverydaylifeadulthoodsuggestedimprovedmeasuresrequiredassesscerebellar-PFCallowearlyidentificationfutureallowingimplementationtimelyinterventionsreasonableadjustmentsAutomaticityExecutiveAbilitiesDevelopmentalDyslexia:TheoreticalReviewSupervisoryAttentionalSystemprospectivestrategyuseworking

Similar Articles

Cited By