Invasive Mussel Coastal Transport From an Already Invaded Estuary to a Nearby Archipelago Detected in DNA and Zooplankton Surveys.

Courtney E Larson, Jonathan T Barge, Chelsea L Hatzenbuhler, Joel C Hoffman, Greg S Peterson, Erik M Pilgrim, Barry Wiechman, Christopher B Rees, Anett S Trebitz
Author Information
  1. Courtney E Larson: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MN, United States.
  2. Jonathan T Barge: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MN, United States.
  3. Chelsea L Hatzenbuhler: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MN, United States.
  4. Joel C Hoffman: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MN, United States.
  5. Greg S Peterson: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MN, United States.
  6. Erik M Pilgrim: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
  7. Barry Wiechman: Aptim Federal Services, LLC, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.
  8. Christopher B Rees: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Northeast Fishery Center, Lamar, PA, United States.
  9. Anett S Trebitz: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MN, United States.

Abstract

Coastal waters of Lake Superior are generally inhospitable to the establishment of invasive . mussels (both and ). have inhabited the Saint Louis River estuary (SLRE; largest commercial port in the Laurentian Great Lakes) for over three decades, but only in the last few years have small colonies been found in the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore (APIS, an archipelago situated 85 km to the east of SLRE) A 2017 survey determined a low abundance spatial distribution in APIS, with the largest colonies on the north and west islands which suggested potential veliger transport from the SLRE longshore currents. Our objective in this study was to determine if veligers are transported by currents at low densities along the south shore of Lake Superior from the SLRE to APIS. To do so, we used both eDNA (water and passive substrate samples) and zooplankton collection methods at eight sites evenly spaced between the SLRE and APIS with three sampling times over five weeks. veligers were consistently detected along the south shore, although at low abundances (veligers per m range = 0-690, median = 8), and for every 1 km increase in distance from the SLRE, both veliger counts and water eDNA copy numbers decreased on average by 5 and 7%, respectively. (suited to estuary habitats) was detected two times more than (better suited to deep-lake habitats). There was not a trend in the veliger size distribution along the south shore, and temperature and calcium concentrations fluctuated around the threshold for veliger and adult development, averaging 11.0°C and 14.8 ppm, respectively. Three zooplankton taxa representative of the estuary community-, , and copepodites-decreased as the distance from the SLRE increased mirroring veliger abundance patterns. Findings represent multiple sources of evidence of a propagule "conveyor belt" for along the south shore of Lake Superior. We conclude that veligers are functioning as a propagule, using coastal currents to spread from the point of invasion, thereby traversing coastal habitat previously reported as inhospitable to distant habitats suitable for colonization.

Keywords

References

  1. Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 Jan;16(1):56-68 [PMID: 25919417]
  2. J Great Lakes Res. 2020 Aug 1;46(4):1015-1027 [PMID: 33424102]
  3. Ecol Evol. 2016 Mar 17;6(9):2739-50 [PMID: 27066248]
  4. J Great Lakes Res. 2019;45(3):691-699 [PMID: 31359907]
  5. Izv Akad Nauk Ser Biol. 2010 Sep-Oct;(5):631-6 [PMID: 21077373]
  6. J Great Lakes Res. 2017;43(1):108-120 [PMID: 30713363]
  7. Hydrobiologia. 2018 Jul 2;817(1):23-40 [PMID: 31274877]
  8. Environ DNA. 2020 Nov 25;3(5):879-883 [PMID: 35330629]
  9. J Great Lakes Res. 2018 Aug;44(4):600-617 [PMID: 31031520]
  10. J Environ Manage. 2017 Nov 01;202(Pt 1):299-310 [PMID: 28738203]
  11. Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Aug;35(8):668-678 [PMID: 32371127]
  12. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 12;12(6):e0179251 [PMID: 28604830]
  13. Environ Res. 2011 Oct;111(7):978-88 [PMID: 21353670]
  14. PeerJ. 2015 Nov 03;3:e1276 [PMID: 26557422]

Grants

  1. EPA999999/Intramural EPA

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SLREveligerLakeSuperiorAPISveligersalongsouthshoreestuarylowcurrentseDNAhabitatsCoastalinhospitablelargestthreecolonieskmabundancedistributiontransportwaterzooplanktontimesdetected=8distancerespectivelysuitedpropagulecoastalwatersgenerallyestablishmentinvasivemusselsinhabitedSaintLouisRivercommercialportLaurentianGreatLakesdecadeslastyearssmallfoundApostleIslandsNationalLakeshorearchipelagosituated85east2017surveydeterminedspatialnorthwestislandssuggestedpotentiallongshoreobjectivestudydeterminetransporteddensitiesusedpassivesubstratesamplescollectionmethodseightsitesevenlyspacedsamplingfiveweeksconsistentlyalthoughabundancespermrange0-690medianevery1increasecountscopynumbersdecreasedaverage57%twobetterdeep-laketrendsizetemperaturecalciumconcentrationsfluctuatedaroundthresholdadultdevelopmentaveraging110°C14ppmThreetaxarepresentativecommunity-copepodites-decreasedincreasedmirroringpatternsFindingsrepresentmultiplesourcesevidence"conveyorbelt"concludefunctioningusingspreadpointinvasiontherebytraversinghabitatpreviouslyreporteddistantsuitablecolonizationInvasiveMusselTransportAlreadyInvadedEstuaryNearbyArchipelagoDetectedDNAZooplanktonSurveysDreissenacurrentqPCR

Similar Articles

Cited By