Dynamics of Remote Communication: Movement Coordination in Video-Mediated and Face-to-Face Conversations.

Julian Zubek, Ewa Nagórska, Joanna Komorowska-Mach, Katarzyna Skowrońska, Konrad Zieliński, Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi
Author Information
  1. Julian Zubek: Human Interactivity and Language Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland. ORCID
  2. Ewa Nagórska: Human Interactivity and Language Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.
  3. Joanna Komorowska-Mach: Human Interactivity and Language Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland. ORCID
  4. Katarzyna Skowrońska: Human Interactivity and Language Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.
  5. Konrad Zieliński: Human Interactivity and Language Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.
  6. Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi: Human Interactivity and Language Lab, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland. ORCID

Abstract

The present pandemic forced our daily interactions to move into the virtual world. People had to adapt to new communication media that afford different ways of interaction. Remote communication decreases the availability and salience of some cues but also may enable and highlight others. Importantly, basic movement dynamics, which are crucial for any interaction as they are responsible for the informational and affective coupling, are affected. It is therefore essential to discover exactly how these dynamics change. In this exploratory study of six interacting dyads we use traditional variability measures and cross recurrence quantification analysis to compare the movement coordination dynamics in quasi-natural dialogues in four situations: (1) remote video-mediated conversations with a self-view mirror image present, (2) remote video-mediated conversations without a self-view, (3) face-to-face conversations with a self-view, and (4) face-to-face conversations without a self-view. We discovered that in remote interactions movements pertaining to communicative gestures were exaggerated, while the stability of interpersonal coordination was greatly decreased. The presence of the self-view image made the gestures less exaggerated, but did not affect the coordination. The dynamical analyses are helpful in understanding the interaction processes and may be useful in explaining phenomena connected with video-mediated communication, such as "Zoom fatigue".

Keywords

References

  1. Cogn Process. 2012 Aug;13 Suppl 1:S79-82 [PMID: 22915258]
  2. Soc Neurosci. 2008;3(2):178-92 [PMID: 18552971]
  3. Cognition. 1986 Feb;22(1):1-39 [PMID: 3709088]
  4. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jul;40(4):1142-52 [PMID: 24749966]
  5. Infant Behav Dev. 2014 May;37(2):235-47 [PMID: 24637006]
  6. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Sep;42(9):1297-310 [PMID: 26962844]
  7. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Dec;55(6):967-78 [PMID: 3216291]
  8. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):856-881 [PMID: 32367351]
  9. Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 29;6:1579 [PMID: 26578997]
  10. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0189752 [PMID: 29320506]
  11. Phys Rev A. 1992 Mar 15;45(6):3403-3411 [PMID: 9907388]
  12. Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 19;8:2228 [PMID: 29312075]
  13. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:203-218 [PMID: 29501975]
  14. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2021 Jan;43(1):172-186 [PMID: 31331883]
  15. PLoS One. 2016 Jan 08;11(1):e0146250 [PMID: 26745874]
  16. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Feb;203:102988 [PMID: 31935659]
  17. J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan 2;162(1):71-88 [PMID: 34651552]
  18. Hum Factors. 2013 Oct;55(5):881-92 [PMID: 24218899]
  19. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Jun;79(3):284-95 [PMID: 21639608]
  20. Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 24;5:1323 [PMID: 25505435]
  21. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jun;151(6):1272-1282 [PMID: 34748361]
  22. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 13;9(8):e105036 [PMID: 25119189]
  23. Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 06;10:2671 [PMID: 31920776]
  24. Electron Mark. 2022;32(1):153-177 [PMID: 35600914]
  25. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011 Jan-Feb;14(1-2):79-83 [PMID: 21329447]
  26. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Oct;14(10):441-7 [PMID: 20674467]
  27. Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;54(2):173-191 [PMID: 30569740]
  28. Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 16;5:720 [PMID: 25076921]
  29. Perception. 2018 Jan;47(1):16-29 [PMID: 28945151]

Grants

  1. 501-D125-01-1250000/University of Warsaw

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0self-viewcommunicationcoordinationremoteconversationsinteractionmovementdynamicsvideo-mediatedpresentinteractionsRemotemayrecurrencequantificationanalysisimagewithoutface-to-facegesturesexaggeratedpandemicforceddailymovevirtualworldPeopleadaptnewmediaafforddifferentwaysdecreasesavailabilitysaliencecuesalsoenablehighlightothersImportantlybasiccrucialresponsibleinformationalaffectivecouplingaffectedthereforeessentialdiscoverexactlychangeexploratorystudysixinteractingdyadsusetraditionalvariabilitymeasurescrosscomparequasi-naturaldialoguesfoursituations:1mirror234discoveredmovementspertainingcommunicativestabilityinterpersonalgreatlydecreasedpresencemadelessaffectdynamicalanalyseshelpfulunderstandingprocessesusefulexplainingphenomenaconnected"Zoomfatigue"DynamicsCommunication:MovementCoordinationVideo-MediatedFace-to-FaceConversations

Similar Articles

Cited By