Multiple Complex Complications After Redo Bariatric Surgery (Infrequent Complication: Fistula Between the Splenic Artery and the Remnant of the Stomach): A Case Report.

Mohammadreza Abdolhosseini, Arsh Haj Mohamad Ebrahim Ketabforoush, Parynaz Parhizgar, Mehdi Tavallaei
Author Information
  1. Mohammadreza Abdolhosseini: Department of Surgery, Nikan Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
  2. Arsh Haj Mohamad Ebrahim Ketabforoush: Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran. ORCID
  3. Parynaz Parhizgar: Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ORCID
  4. Mehdi Tavallaei: Department of General Surgery, Ayatollah Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

With the epidemic prevalence of obesity in today's society, bariatric surgery has become very popular in treating severe obesity. Although the complications of this surgery have decreased with the advancement of medicine and post-treatment care, there are still complications that can lead to death if neglected. In this case report, we present a 44-year-old patient who underwent redo bariatric surgery. She was discharged from the hospital in good general condition but returned a few days later with a major complaint of abdominal pain and sudden bleeding from the upper gastrointestinal tract. After performing CT and endoscopy and considering the results, the patient underwent laparotomy, which showed a fistula between the splenic artery and the remnant of the stomach. After surgery and after the recovery period, the patient was discharged from the hospital. In this case report, we describe for the first time an uncommon and unique complication following redo bariatric surgery. We suggest that a fistula between the splenic artery and the remnant of the stomach should be considered in patients with abdominal pain and upper gastrointestinal bleeding who underwent redo bariatric surgery.

Keywords

References

  1. Diabetes Care. 2010 Feb;33(2):287-9 [PMID: 19889803]
  2. Ann Surg. 2005 Jan;241(1):55-62 [PMID: 15621991]
  3. Am J Surg. 2010 Sep;200(3):378-85 [PMID: 20409518]
  4. ISRN Obes. 2013 Jun 27;2013:392747 [PMID: 24555142]
  5. Med Clin North Am. 2000 Mar;84(2):477-89 [PMID: 10793653]
  6. Arch Surg. 2003 Sep;138(9):957-61 [PMID: 12963651]
  7. Obes Surg. 2019 Nov;29(11):3527-3535 [PMID: 31187456]
  8. Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1067-1087 [PMID: 32107632]
  9. J Obes. 2010;2010: [PMID: 20700409]
  10. Obes Surg. 1991 Sep;1(3):257-265 [PMID: 10775921]
  11. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 30;361(5):445-54 [PMID: 19641201]
  12. Clin Obes. 2017 Apr;7(2):115-122 [PMID: 28199050]
  13. Semin Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;44(4):283-96 [PMID: 19715793]
  14. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Sep-Oct;10(5):952-72 [PMID: 24776071]
  15. Surg Endosc. 2005 Jun;19(6):845-8 [PMID: 15868262]
  16. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008 Feb;158(2):135-45 [PMID: 18230819]
  17. N Z Med J. 2013 Nov 22;126(1386):66-81 [PMID: 24316994]
  18. Ulster Med J. 2011 Sep;80(3):151-3 [PMID: 23526467]
  19. Obes Surg. 2013 Feb;23(2):241-8 [PMID: 23229950]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0surgerybariatricobesitycomplicationspatientunderwentredogastrointestinalfistulacasereportdischargedhospitalabdominalpainbleedinguppersplenicarteryremnantstomachBariatricepidemicprevalencetoday'ssocietybecomepopulartreatingsevereAlthoughdecreasedadvancementmedicinepost-treatmentcarestillcanleaddeathneglectedpresent44-year-oldgoodgeneralconditionreturneddayslatermajorcomplaintsuddentractperformingCTendoscopyconsideringresultslaparotomyshowedrecoveryperioddescribefirsttimeuncommonuniquecomplicationfollowingsuggestconsideredpatientsMultipleComplexComplicationsRedoSurgeryInfrequentComplication:FistulaSplenicArteryRemnantStomach:CaseReporthemorrhage

Similar Articles

Cited By