Baseline basophil and basophil-to-lymphocyte status is associated with clinical outcomes in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer.

Agreen Hadadi, Katherine Er Smith, Limeng Wan, Jacqueline R Brown, Greta Russler, Lauren Yantorni, Sarah Caulfield, Jennifer Lafollette, Melvin Moore, Omer Kucuk, Bradley Carthon, Bassel Nazha, Yuan Liu, Mehmet A Bilen
Author Information
  1. Agreen Hadadi: Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
  2. Katherine Er Smith: Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
  3. Limeng Wan: Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
  4. Jacqueline R Brown: Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
  5. Greta Russler: Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
  6. Lauren Yantorni: Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
  7. Sarah Caulfield: Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
  8. Jennifer Lafollette: Grady Cancer Center for Excellence, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA.
  9. Melvin Moore: Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Grady Cancer Center for Excellence, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA.
  10. Omer Kucuk: Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Grady Cancer Center for Excellence, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA.
  11. Bradley Carthon: Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Grady Cancer Center for Excellence, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA.
  12. Bassel Nazha: Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Grady Cancer Center for Excellence, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA.
  13. Yuan Liu: Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
  14. Mehmet A Bilen: Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Grady Cancer Center for Excellence, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: mehmet.a.bilen@emory.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers have the potential to provide clinical guidance, but there is limited data for biomarkers in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter review from Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University and Georgia Cancer Center for Excellence at Grady Memorial Hospital (2014-2020) in the United States of America (USA). We collected demographics, disease characteristics, and laboratory data, including complete blood counts (CBC) at the start of upfront therapy. We evaluated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) associated with baseline lab values.
RESULTS: 165 patients were included with a median follow-up time of 33.5 months (mo). 105 (63.6%) had Gleason scores of 8-10 and 108 (65.9%) were classified as high-volume disease. 92 patients received upfront docetaxel (55.8%) and 73 received upfront abiraterone (44.2%). Univariate analyses (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) identified worse clinical outcomes (CO) associated with elevated basophils and basophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (BLR). Based on MVA, elevated basophils (defined as ≥0.1, optimal cut) were associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.51 (95% CI 1.65-7.43, P 0.001) for OS and HR of 1.88 (95% CI 1.05-3.38, P 0.034) for PFS. Our MVA also found that BLR ≥0.0142 was associated with HR 2.11 (95% CI 1.09-4.10, P 0.028) for OS; however, PFS was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that elevated baseline basophils and BLR are associated with worse clinical outcomes in mHSPC. Although results require further validation, BLR is a potential prognostic biomarker.

Keywords

References

  1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 29;106(6):dju124 [PMID: 24875653]
  2. World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):143-150 [PMID: 30993426]
  3. Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74 [PMID: 21376230]
  4. Cancer. 2019 Jan 1;125(1):127-134 [PMID: 30329148]
  5. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:363-371 [PMID: 30231388]
  6. Cancer Res. 2016 Apr 1;76(7):1792-803 [PMID: 26873846]
  7. Cancer Microenviron. 2013 Aug;6(2):179-91 [PMID: 23179263]
  8. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Dec;19(4):395-397 [PMID: 27431496]
  9. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 12;378(15):1408-1418 [PMID: 29420164]
  10. Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jan;5(1):77-80 [PMID: 28753893]
  11. F1000Res. 2018 Dec 19;7:1955 [PMID: 31231506]
  12. BMC Cancer. 2016 Feb 16;16:111 [PMID: 26883640]
  13. Oncotarget. 2017 May 23;8(21):35255-35261 [PMID: 27823973]
  14. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Jun;23(2):220-231 [PMID: 32034294]
  15. Cancer Cell Int. 2020 Aug 26;20:409 [PMID: 32863768]
  16. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2017 Aug;9(8):565-573 [PMID: 28794807]
  17. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Mar;32(3): [PMID: 28605139]
  18. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Feb 11;18(2): [PMID: 28208664]
  19. Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jan;4(1):121-127 [PMID: 29162421]
  20. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 10;37(32):2974-2986 [PMID: 31329516]
  21. Cancer Med. 2018 Mar;7(3):690-697 [PMID: 29468834]
  22. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct;14(5):e243-e251 [PMID: 29532611]
  23. Regen Biomater. 2017 Feb;4(1):55-68 [PMID: 28149530]
  24. N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):737-46 [PMID: 26244877]
  25. BMC Cancer. 2020 Sep 25;20(1):919 [PMID: 32977754]
  26. Target Oncol. 2017 Aug;12(4):401-412 [PMID: 28620691]
  27. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):e493-503 [PMID: 25281468]
  28. Clin Transl Med. 2020 Feb 10;9(1):6 [PMID: 32037496]
  29. Cancer. 2014 Nov 1;120(21):3346-52 [PMID: 24995769]

Grants

  1. P30 CA138292/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Basophils
Docetaxel
Hormones
Humans
Lymphocytes
Male
Prostatic Neoplasms
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
Retrospective Studies

Chemicals

Hormones
Docetaxel

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0associated1clinicalprostatecancerBLRupfrontOSPFSMVAoutcomeselevatedbasophilsratioHR95%CIP0BiomarkerspotentialdatametastatichormonesensitivemHSPCCancerdiseasesurvivalbaselinepatientsreceivedanalysesworsebasophil-to-lymphocyte≥0BACKGROUND:provideguidancelimitedbiomarkersMETHODS:performedretrospectivemulticenterreviewWinshipInstituteEmoryUniversityGeorgiaCenterExcellenceGradyMemorialHospital2014-2020UnitedStatesAmericaUSAcollecteddemographicscharacteristicslaboratoryincludingcompletebloodcountsCBC atstarttherapyevaluatedoverallprogression-freelabvaluesRESULTS:165includedmedianfollow-uptime335monthsmo105636%Gleasonscores8-10108659%classifiedhigh-volume92docetaxel558%73abiraterone442%UnivariateUVAmultivariableidentifiedCOBaseddefinedoptimalcuthazard35165-7430018805-338034alsofound014221109-410028howeverstatisticallysignificantCONCLUSION:concludeAlthoughresultsrequirevalidationprognosticbiomarkerBaselinebasophilstatusBasophillymphocyteBasophilsCastration-sensitiveHormone-sensitive

Similar Articles

Cited By