Analytical approaches for detection of breath VOC biomarkers of cattle diseases -A review.

Shokouh Haddadi, Jacek A Koziel, Terry J Engelken
Author Information
  1. Shokouh Haddadi: Department of Chemistry, State University of New York at Oswego, 7060 State Route 104, Oswego, NY, 13126-3599, USA. Electronic address: Shokouh.haddadi@oswego.edu.
  2. Jacek A Koziel: Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, 605 Bissell Road, Ames, IA, 50011-1098, USA. Electronic address: koziel@iastate.edu.
  3. Terry J Engelken: Department of Veterinary Diagnostic & Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, 1712 South Riverside Drive, Ames, IA, 50011-1134, USA. Electronic address: engelken@iastate.edu.

Abstract

Diagnosis of diseases in cattle at early stages is of significance both economically and clinically. Non-invasive diagnostic samples such as breath are preferred since they cause minimum inconvenience or pain to the animals. In this review, different sampling devices, sample preparation techniques, instrumentation, and statistical analysis approaches that have been designed and tested are described and compared in terms of their applicability in the diagnosis of common cattle diseases. The sample preparation techniques used include solid-phase microextraction (SPME), sorbent extraction, and needle trap device (NTD). The collected volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are determined using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and the electronic nose (e-nose) technology. The majority of studies are focused on the diagnosis of ketosis and bovine respiratory disease (BRD). The common diseases and potential biomarkers are summarized and discussed. Due to the differences in the number of subjects and the type of animals used in different studies, the results are not consistent. Acetone, although detected in almost all studies and subjects, has elevated concentrations in cattle suffering from ketosis. The results of currently available studies were not indicative of specific biomarkers for BRD, and further investigation is required. The current studies have shortcomings in regards to defining useful VOC profiles, the impact on animal welfare, and the practical application at the producer level. While the presented approaches are promising, more controlled, standardized clinical studies need to be conducted before breath analysis can be routinely performed on cattle.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Animals
Biomarkers
Breath Tests
Cattle
Cattle Diseases
Humans
Ketosis
Volatile Organic Compounds

Chemicals

Biomarkers
Volatile Organic Compounds

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studiescattlediseasesbreathsamplepreparationanalysisapproachesbiomarkersNon-invasiveanimalsreviewdifferenttechniquesdiagnosiscommonusedorganiccompoundsketosisBRDsubjectsresultsVOCagricultureDiagnosisearlystagessignificanceeconomicallyclinicallydiagnosticsamplespreferredsincecauseminimuminconveniencepainsamplingdevicesinstrumentationstatisticaldesignedtesteddescribedcomparedtermsapplicabilityincludesolid-phasemicroextractionSPMEsorbentextractionneedletrapdeviceNTDcollectedvolatileVOCsdeterminedusinggaschromatography-massspectrometryGC-MSelectronicnosee-nosetechnologymajorityfocusedbovinerespiratorydiseasepotentialsummarizeddiscussedDuedifferencesnumbertypeconsistentAcetonealthoughdetectedalmostelevatedconcentrationssufferingcurrentlyavailableindicativespecificinvestigationrequiredcurrentshortcomingsregardsdefiningusefulprofilesimpactanimalwelfarepracticalapplicationproducerlevelpresentedpromisingcontrolledstandardizedclinicalneedconductedcanroutinelyperformedAnalyticaldetection-AAnimalBovinehealthPrecisionSamplingVolatile

Similar Articles

Cited By