Inducible Clindamycin-Resistant Strains in Africa: A Systematic Review.

Muluneh Assefa
Author Information
  1. Muluneh Assefa: Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, P.O. Box 196, Gondar, Ethiopia. ORCID

Abstract

Introduction: Excessive use of clindamycin enhances the acquisition of inducible clindamycin-resistant strains, which is a significant health problem in Africa. The main objective of this review study was to determine the prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance and related genes among isolates in Africa.
Methods: A qualitative systematic review was conducted on inducible clindamycin resistance among isolates in Africa using electronic databases such as Google Scholar and PubMed. Articles published in English before 2021 were selected, and relevant data were extracted, collected, and analyzed.
Results: In our search, 22 articles met the eligibility criteria for this review study. Of 3064 total isolates, 605 had iMLSB phenotype. The overall prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in isolates was 19.8% with a range of 2.9% to 44.0%. A high number of iMLSB phenotypes were observed in MRSA isolates (3.6-77.8%) than MSSA (0-58.8%). The overall prevalence of the iMLSB phenotype in MRSA strains was 26.8% (279/1041). The maximum peak prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance among isolates recorded in the continent was 44.0% in Egypt, followed by 35.8% in Libya and 33.3% in Uganda in 2017, 2007, and 2013, respectively. The highest prevalence of iMLSB phenotype in MRSA strains was reported in Egypt, 77.8%, followed by Nigeria, 75.0%, and Libya, 66.2%. Among the recovered drug-resistance genes, ermA, ermC, and msrA genes were commonly detected in Egypt with 67.9%, 70.0%, and 70.0% prevalence, respectively.
Conclusion: This review highlights a higher inducible resistance of , including MRSA strains to clindamycin in the continent. Regular screening of these strains, wise use of clindamycin, and molecular detection and genotyping of resistant genes are urgent.

References

  1. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2015 Jul-Sep;33(3):456-8 [PMID: 26068362]
  2. Afr Health Sci. 2015 Sep;15(3):861-7 [PMID: 26957975]
  3. Iran J Microbiol. 2014 Dec;6(6):421-7 [PMID: 25926961]
  4. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020 Nov 30;14(11):1281-1287 [PMID: 33296341]
  5. Clin Lab. 2020 Nov 1;66(11): [PMID: 33180420]
  6. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Nov 17;10(11): [PMID: 34827344]
  7. BMC Res Notes. 2017 Aug 22;10(1):417 [PMID: 28830510]
  8. Int J Infect Dis. 2016 May;46:18-21 [PMID: 26987479]
  9. Infect Genet Evol. 2021 Dec;96:105127 [PMID: 34718190]
  10. J Infect Chemother. 2015 Feb;21(2):81-3 [PMID: 25454215]
  11. Future Sci OA. 2020 Oct 20;7(1):FSO361 [PMID: 33437500]
  12. Clin Lab. 2021 Jul 1;67(7): [PMID: 34258960]
  13. Microb Drug Resist. 2014 Feb;20(1):82-8 [PMID: 24033147]
  14. Int J Microbiol. 2019 Apr 01;2019:2965490 [PMID: 31065270]
  15. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2017 Apr 30;11(4):350-354 [PMID: 28459227]
  16. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):483 [PMID: 28693489]
  17. Br Microbiol Res J. 2014 Dec 1;4(12):1335-1344 [PMID: 26046016]
  18. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 15;6(Suppl 1):S47-S53 [PMID: 30895214]
  19. Libyan J Med. 2009 Sep 01;4(3):104-6 [PMID: 21483523]
  20. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Jun 17;8:102 [PMID: 31236269]
  21. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2019 Feb;10(1):25-31 [PMID: 30847268]
  22. Indian J Med Res. 2016 Mar;143(3):362-4 [PMID: 27241651]
  23. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Aug;9(8):DC20-3 [PMID: 26435945]
  24. J Med Microbiol. 2019 Sep;68(9):1299-1305 [PMID: 31140965]
  25. PLoS One. 2021 Jul 14;16(7):e0254737 [PMID: 34260667]
  26. Medchemcomm. 2019 Mar 14;10(8):1231-1241 [PMID: 31534648]
  27. BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 9;19(1):596 [PMID: 31288757]
  28. Med J Armed Forces India. 2014 Jan;70(1):43-7 [PMID: 24623947]
  29. Front Microbiol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2749 [PMID: 30538678]
  30. Avicenna J Med. 2016 Jul-Sep;6(3):75-80 [PMID: 27390669]
  31. PLoS One. 2022 Feb 1;17(2):e0262956 [PMID: 35104293]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0clindamycininducibleprevalenceisolates8%strainsresistance0%reviewgenesiMLSBMRSAAfricaamongphenotypeEgyptusestudyoverall9%44continentfollowedLibyarespectively70Introduction:Excessiveenhancesacquisitionclindamycin-resistantsignificanthealthproblemmainobjectivedeterminerelatedMethods:qualitativesystematicconductedusingelectronicdatabasesGoogleScholarPubMedArticlespublishedEnglish2021selectedrelevantdataextractedcollectedanalyzedResults:search22articlesmeteligibilitycriteria3064total60519range2highnumberphenotypesobserved36-77MSSA0-5826279/1041maximumpeakrecorded35333%Uganda201720072013highestreported77Nigeria75662%Amongrecovereddrug-resistanceermAermCmsrAcommonlydetected67Conclusion:highlightshigherincludingRegularscreeningwisemoleculardetectiongenotypingresistanturgentInducibleClindamycin-ResistantStrainsAfrica:SystematicReview

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)