Plumage and Fat Condition Scores as Well-Being Assessment Indicators in a Small Passerine Bird, the Zebra Finch ().

Lisa Kalnins, Oliver Krüger, E Tobias Krause
Author Information
  1. Lisa Kalnins: Department of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
  2. Oliver Krüger: Department of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
  3. E Tobias Krause: Department of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Abstract

The well-being of animals kept by humans in laboratories, farms, or as pets should always be of the highest importance, and a prerequisite for this is adequate housing. To assess the potential indicators for animal well-being, ideally simple, non-invasive, and reliable methods are necessary. Here, we propose a novel plumage scoring system for small songbirds, using the example of the Zebra Finch, and examine its reliability in comparison with a well-known body condition index, that is, the fat score. We used up to five different observers of different experience levels to assess inter- and intra-observer reliability of the proposed plumage score and also the fat score. We found substantial inter-observer reliability for the proposed novel plumage score, and lower inter-observer reliability for the fat score, which seems to require more training of observers. The intra-observer reliability of the experienced observer who trained the others also showed a very strong reliability for the plumage score and for the fat score. Thus, we conclude that our proposed novel plumage score is a simple, reliable, and non-invasive way to estimate an important indicator of captive Zebra Finches' well-being. Furthermore, the plumage score can be reliably taught to other observers. The plumage score, maybe in combination with the fat score, may be an important tool to reliably assess well-being on a regular basis in captive populations in zoos, laboratories, or pet stocks.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2007 Sep 19;2(9):e901 [PMID: 17878936]
  2. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 7;276(1664):2051-6 [PMID: 19324794]
  3. Mol Ecol. 2007 Oct;16(19):4039-50 [PMID: 17894758]
  4. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e86519 [PMID: 24489736]
  5. Front Zool. 2015 Aug 24;12 Suppl 1:S11 [PMID: 26816511]
  6. Vet Rec. 2001 Feb 17;148(7):195-7 [PMID: 11265995]
  7. Vet Rec. 1992 Aug 29;131(9):190-4 [PMID: 1441174]
  8. Br Poult Sci. 1999 Sep;40(4):444-51 [PMID: 10579400]
  9. Poult Sci. 2001 May;80(5):549-52 [PMID: 11372702]
  10. Acta Vet Scand. 2016 Oct 20;58(Suppl 1):57 [PMID: 27766974]
  11. Behav Genet. 2007 Mar;37(2):399-407 [PMID: 17106652]
  12. Am Nat. 2007 Jan;169(S1):S122-S136 [PMID: 29517928]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0scoreplumagereliabilityfatwell-beingZebraassessnovelFinchobserversproposedlaboratoriesanimalsimplenon-invasivereliableconditiondifferentintra-observeralsointer-observerobserverimportantcaptivereliablyanimalskepthumansfarmspetsalwayshighestimportanceprerequisiteadequatehousingpotentialindicatorsideallymethodsnecessaryproposescoringsystemsmallsongbirdsusingexampleexaminecomparisonwell-knownbodyindexusedfiveexperiencelevelsinter-foundsubstantiallowerseemsrequiretrainingexperiencedtrainedothersshowedstrongThusconcludewayestimateindicatorFinches'FurthermorecantaughtmaybecombinationmaytoolregularbasispopulationszoospetstocksPlumageFatConditionScoresWell-BeingAssessmentIndicatorsSmallPasserineBirdwelfarefeathersongbird

Similar Articles

Cited By