Motivations for concurrent use of uppers and downers among people who access harm reduction services in British Columbia, Canada: findings from the 2019 Harm Reduction Client Survey.

Abigail Steinberg, Amiti Mehta, Kristi Papamihali, Christine D Lukac, Sara Young, Brittany Graham, Kurt Lock, Mathew Fleury, Jane A Buxton
Author Information
  1. Abigail Steinberg: Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  2. Amiti Mehta: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  3. Kristi Papamihali: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  4. Christine D Lukac: Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  5. Sara Young: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  6. Brittany Graham: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  7. Kurt Lock: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  8. Mathew Fleury: British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  9. Jane A Buxton: School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Jane.Buxton@bccdc.ca.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An increase in crystal methamphetamine (methamphetamine) use during the overdose epidemic is being observed in British Columbia (BC), Canada, and across North America. Concurrent use (ie, using uppers and downers one after the other or together) can increase the risk of fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated motivations for concurrent use of uppers and downers, specifically how (eg, in what order) and why people use concurrently, to identify potential interventions to prevent overdose and other harms.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The 2019 harm reduction Client Survey was administered across 22 harm reduction supply distribution sites in BC (n=621). This thematic analysis examined 307 responses by people who affirmed concurrent use to classify order and reasons for using uppers and downers concurrently.
RESULTS: Of the 307 people who responded 'yes' to concurrent use, 179 (58.3%) used downers then uppers, 76 (24.8%) used uppers then downers and 184 (59.9%) mixed uppers and downers together. Four main reasons for concurrent use emerged: self-medication, availability and preference, drug effects/properties, and financial and life situation. People who mixed drugs together predominantly wanted to achieve desired drug effects/properties, such as a specific high or balancing stimulating and sedating effects.
CONCLUSIONS: The ongoing rise in overdoses in BC is multifactorial, and the recent parallel increases in methamphetamine use and concurrent use with opioids may contribute. Qualitative interviews may further elucidate reasons for concurrent use. Addressing reasons for concurrent use identified in this study through harm reduction strategies and education may affect the rates of overdose morbidity and mortality.

Keywords

References

  1. Harm Reduct J. 2020 Feb 27;17(1):14 [PMID: 32106854]
  2. Harm Reduct J. 2014 Apr 27;11:13 [PMID: 24766846]
  3. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Dec 1;205:107609 [PMID: 31654839]
  4. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107592 [PMID: 31586804]
  5. J Urban Health. 2013 Apr;90(2):299-306 [PMID: 22689300]
  6. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192851 [PMID: 31026029]
  7. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 Dec 12;80(3):297-302 [PMID: 15961257]
  8. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jan 1;182:86-92 [PMID: 29175463]
  9. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:14-20 [PMID: 30326396]
  10. Int J Drug Policy. 2021 May;91:103098 [PMID: 33476863]
  11. J Addict Med. 2021 Jan-Feb 01;15(1):34-39 [PMID: 32530888]
  12. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020 Nov;39(7):932-940 [PMID: 32666650]
  13. PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0252090 [PMID: 34038452]
  14. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020 Mar;39(3):209-215 [PMID: 32202009]
  15. Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Jul 3;52(8):1051-1058 [PMID: 28323507]
  16. Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Mar;77:102665 [PMID: 31962283]
  17. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Sep;77(5):774-81 [PMID: 27588536]
  18. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Aug 30;68(34):737-744 [PMID: 31465320]

MeSH Term

British Columbia
Drug Overdose
Harm Reduction
Humans
Methamphetamine
Motivation

Chemicals

Methamphetamine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0useconcurrentuppersdownersoverdosepeoplereasonsmethamphetamineBCtogetherharmreductionmayincreaseBritishColumbiaacrossusingorderconcurrently2019HarmReductionClientSurvey307usedmixeddrugeffects/propertiesINTRODUCTION:crystalepidemicobservedCanadaNorthAmericaConcurrentieonecanriskfatalnon-fatalopioidOBJECTIVES:investigatedmotivationsspecificallyegidentifypotentialinterventionspreventharmsSETTINGANDPARTICIPANTS:administered22supplydistributionsitesn=621thematicanalysisexaminedresponsesaffirmedclassifyRESULTS:responded'yes'179583%76248%184599%Fourmainemerged:self-medicationavailabilitypreferencefinanciallifesituationPeopledrugspredominantlywantedachievedesiredspecifichighbalancingstimulatingsedatingeffectsCONCLUSIONS:ongoingriseoverdosesmultifactorialrecentparallelincreasesopioidscontributeQualitativeinterviewselucidateAddressingidentifiedstudystrategieseducationaffectratesmorbiditymortalityMotivationsamongaccessservicesCanada:findingsPUBLICHEALTHQUALITATIVERESEARCHSubstancemisuse

Similar Articles

Cited By (8)