The effect of facial occlusion on facial impressions of trustworthiness and dominance.

Manuel Oliveira, Teresa Garcia-Marques
Author Information
  1. Manuel Oliveira: Department of Social, Health, and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.j.barbosadeoliveira@uu.nl.
  2. Teresa Garcia-Marques: William James Center for Research, ISPA - Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco n°34, 1149-041, Lisboa, Portugal. ORCID

Abstract

Recognizing the role that facial appearance plays in guiding social interactions, here we investigated how occlusions of the bottom-face region affect facial impressions of trustworthiness and dominance. Previous studies suggesting that different facial features impact inferences on these traits sustain the hypothesis that wearing a face mask will differently affect each trait inference. And specifically, that trustworthiness impressions will be more disrupted by this type of face occlusion than dominance impressions. In two studies, we addressed this possibility by occluding the bottom face region of faces that were previously shown to convey different levels of dominance and trustworthiness, and tested differences in the ability to discriminate between these trait levels across occlusion conditions. In Study 1 faces were occluded by a mask, and in Study 2 by a square image. In both studies, results showed that although facial occlusions generally reduced participants' confidence on their trait judgments, the ability to discriminate facial trustworthiness was more strongly affected than the ability to discriminate facial dominance. Practical and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Hum Biol. 2011 Nov-Dec;23(6):805-14 [PMID: 21957062]
  2. Pers Individ Dif. 2020 Nov 1;166:110200 [PMID: 32834278]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 12;111(32):E3353-61 [PMID: 25071197]
  4. Emotion. 2003 Jun;3(2):150-66 [PMID: 12899416]
  5. Emotion. 2006 May;6(2):269-78 [PMID: 16768559]
  6. Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 21;10(1):22344 [PMID: 33349645]
  7. Br J Psychol. 2001 Feb;92 Part 1:239-255 [PMID: 11802872]
  8. Emotion. 2007 Nov;7(4):730-5 [PMID: 18039040]
  9. Perception. 2021 Oct;50(10):876-889 [PMID: 34549649]
  10. Evol Psychol. 2014;12(1):1-18 [PMID: 24558653]
  11. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Feb;149(2):323-342 [PMID: 31294585]
  12. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Apr;64(4):751-66 [PMID: 21086218]
  13. Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 06;5:139 [PMID: 24639658]
  14. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53285 [PMID: 23326406]
  15. Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):349-54 [PMID: 20424067]
  16. Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):105-18 [PMID: 23376296]
  17. Emotion. 2013 Aug;13(4):724-38 [PMID: 23627724]
  18. Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8 [PMID: 18839484]
  19. R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Sep 22;8(9):211146 [PMID: 34567592]
  20. Emotion. 2009 Feb;9(1):128-33 [PMID: 19186926]
  21. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Jan;62(1):88-97 [PMID: 1538316]
  22. Perception. 2019 Jun;48(6):461-470 [PMID: 31006340]
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105(32):11087-92 [PMID: 18685089]
  24. Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):592-8 [PMID: 16866745]

MeSH Term

Attitude
Facial Expression
Humans
Judgment
Masks
Social Perception
Trust

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0facialtrustworthinessdominanceimpressionsstudiesfacetraitocclusionabilitydiscriminateocclusionsregionaffectdifferentmaskwillfaceslevelsStudyFaceRecognizingroleappearanceplaysguidingsocialinteractionsinvestigatedbottom-facePrevioussuggestingfeaturesimpactinferencestraitssustainhypothesiswearingdifferentlyinferencespecificallydisruptedtypetwoaddressedpossibilityoccludingbottompreviouslyshownconveytesteddifferencesacrossconditions1occluded2squareimageresultsshowedalthoughgenerallyreducedparticipants'confidencejudgmentsstronglyaffectedPracticaltheoreticalimplicationsfindingsdiscussedeffectDominancemasksperceptionImpressionformationTrustworthiness

Similar Articles

Cited By