Effects of dietary methyl sulfonyl methane and selenium on laying performance, egg quality, gut health indicators, and antioxidant capacity of laying hens.

Yoo Bhin Kim, Sang Hyeok Lee, Da-Hye Kim, Kyung-Woo Lee
Author Information
  1. Yoo Bhin Kim: Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
  2. Sang Hyeok Lee: Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
  3. Da-Hye Kim: Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
  4. Kyung-Woo Lee: Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effects of dietary methyl sulfonyl methane (MSM) and selenium (Se) on the laying performance, egg quality, gut health indicators, egg yolk Se content, and antioxidant markers in laying hens.
METHODS: One hundred ninety-two 73-wk-old laying hens were randomly divided into four groups with eight replicates of six hens each. Four diets were prepared in a 2×2 factorial arrangement with or without MSM and Se. The trial lasted for 12 wk.
RESULTS: There were no interaction effects or main effects (p>0.05) on laying performance and egg quality. However, feed intake increased in Se-fed hens (p = 0.051) and decreased in MSM-fed hens (p = 0.067) compared with that of hens in the control group. Dietary MSM increased (p<0.05) the ileal villus height and villus height:crypt ratio in hens compared with those receiving the non-supplemented control diet. Dietary MSM and Se did not affect the percentage of short-chain fatty acids in the ileal contents. Dietary Se enriched the Se content in egg yolk compared with that of the non-supplemented control diet (p<0.05). Dietary Se increased (p<0.05) glutathione peroxidase levels in the liver and serum samples compared to the control diet. The total antioxidant capacity in the liver increased (p<0.05) in laying hens that were fed MSM-supplemented diets than in hens fed the control diet. Dietary MSM significantly increased the relative superoxide dismutase levels in serum samples (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Supplementation with either MSM or Se independently improved the antioxidant capacity of laying hens. Furthermore, dietary Se produced Se-enriched eggs, but this effect was neither additive nor synergistic with dietary MSM.

Keywords

References

  1. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017 Jul 21;14:24 [PMID: 28736511]
  2. Arch Pharm Res. 2013 Sep;36(9):1140-8 [PMID: 23591777]
  3. Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 13;10(3): [PMID: 32183035]
  4. Poult Sci. 2017 Sep 1;96(11):3973-3980 [PMID: 29050423]
  5. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009 Apr;32(4):651-6 [PMID: 19336900]
  6. Poult Sci. 2021 Aug;100(8):101276 [PMID: 34229219]
  7. Poult Sci. 2020 Feb;99(2):914-925 [PMID: 32029168]
  8. J Dairy Sci. 2001 Jan;84(1):225-32 [PMID: 11210037]
  9. Poult Sci. 2020 Feb;99(2):1069-1074 [PMID: 32029143]
  10. Poult Sci. 2015 May;94(5):965-75 [PMID: 25717085]
  11. Physiol Behav. 2006 Feb 28;87(2):430-40 [PMID: 16376389]
  12. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019 Jun;189(2):548-555 [PMID: 30232747]
  13. Poult Sci. 2020 Jun;99(6):3133-3143 [PMID: 32475450]
  14. Poult Sci. 2018 Sep 1;97(9):3102-3108 [PMID: 29788509]
  15. Poult Sci. 2019 Sep 1;98(9):4030-4041 [PMID: 30805637]
  16. Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 31;12(1): [PMID: 35011193]
  17. Meat Sci. 2013 Jun;94(2):220-7 [PMID: 23501254]
  18. Foods. 2020 Jan 08;9(1): [PMID: 31936314]
  19. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020 Jan 25;9(2): [PMID: 31991738]
  20. Poult Sci. 2017 Jul 1;96(7):2168-2175 [PMID: 28339708]
  21. Poult Sci. 2012 Jan;91(1):265-70 [PMID: 22184453]
  22. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2015 Jun;165(2):183-93 [PMID: 25721721]
  23. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021 Apr 6;12(1):47 [PMID: 33820552]
  24. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2003 Oct 13;42(39):4742-58 [PMID: 14562341]
  25. Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 04;11(6): [PMID: 34199988]
  26. Inflammation. 2013 Oct;36(5):1111-21 [PMID: 23595869]
  27. Nutrients. 2017 Mar 16;9(3): [PMID: 28300758]
  28. J Appl Microbiol. 2019 Dec;127(6):1677-1685 [PMID: 31509887]
  29. Front Immunol. 2021 Oct 04;12:745849 [PMID: 34671361]

Grants

  1. PJ015158/Rural Development Administration

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0hensSelayingMSM05eggincreasedcontrolDietaryp<0dietaryantioxidantcompareddieteffectsperformancequalitycapacitymethylsulfonylmethaneseleniumguthealthindicatorsyolkcontentdietsp=0ilealvillusnon-supplementedlevelsliverserumsamplesfedLayingOBJECTIVE:studyinvestigatedmarkersMETHODS:Onehundredninety-two73-wk-oldrandomlydividedfourgroupseightreplicatessixFourprepared2×2factorialarrangementwithouttriallasted12wkRESULTS:interactionmainp>0HoweverfeedintakeSe-fed051decreasedMSM-fed067groupheightheight:cryptratioreceivingaffectpercentageshort-chainfattyacidscontentsenrichedglutathioneperoxidasetotalMSM-supplementedsignificantlyrelativesuperoxidedismutaseCONCLUSION:SupplementationeitherindependentlyimprovedFurthermoreproducedSe-enrichedeggseffectneitheradditivesynergisticEffectsAntioxidantCapacityHenPerformanceMethylSulfonylMethaneSelenium

Similar Articles

Cited By