Recent advances in additive manufacturing of engineering thermoplastics: challenges and opportunities.

Maisyn Picard, Amar K Mohanty, Manjusri Misra
Author Information
  1. Maisyn Picard: School of Engineering, University of Guelph Thornbrough Building Guelph N1G 2W1 ON Canada mohanty@uoguelph.ca mmisra@uoguelph.ca. ORCID
  2. Amar K Mohanty: School of Engineering, University of Guelph Thornbrough Building Guelph N1G 2W1 ON Canada mohanty@uoguelph.ca mmisra@uoguelph.ca. ORCID
  3. Manjusri Misra: School of Engineering, University of Guelph Thornbrough Building Guelph N1G 2W1 ON Canada mohanty@uoguelph.ca mmisra@uoguelph.ca. ORCID

Abstract

There are many limitations within three-dimensional (3D) printing that hinder its adaptation into industries such as biomedical, cosmetic, processing, automotive, aerospace, and electronics. The disadvantages of 3D printing include the inability of parts to function in weight-bearing applications, reduced mechanical performance from anisotropic properties of printed products, and limited intrinsic material performances such as flame retardancy, thermal stability, and/or electrical conductivity. Many of these shortcomings have prevented the adaptation of 3D printing into product development, especially with few novel researched materials being sold commercially. In many cases, high-performance engineering thermoplastics (ET) provide a basis for increased thermal and mechanical performances to address the shortcomings or limitations of both selective laser sintering and extrusion 3D printing. The first strategy to combat these limitations is to fabricate blends or composites. Novel printing materials have been implemented to reduce anisotropic properties and losses in strength. Additives such as flame retardants generate robust materials with V0 flame retardancy ratings, and compatibilizers can improve thermal or dimensional stability. To serve the electronic industry better, the addition of carbon black at only 4 wt%, to an ET matrix has been found to improve the electrical conductivity by five times the magnitude. Surface modifications such as photopolymerization have improved the usability of ET in automotive applications, whereas the dynamic chemical processes increased the biocompatibility of ET for medical device materials. Thermal resistant foam from polyamide 12 and fly ash spheres were researched and fabricated as possible insulation materials for automotive industries. These works and others have not only generated great potential for additive manufacturing technologies, but also provided solutions to critical challenges of 3D printing.

References

  1. Polymers (Basel). 2018 Dec 11;10(12): [PMID: 30961298]
  2. Materials (Basel). 2016 Aug 05;9(8): [PMID: 28773780]
  3. Science. 2018 Nov 2;362(6414):536-542 [PMID: 30385569]
  4. RSC Adv. 2019 Jun 24;9(34):19606-19612 [PMID: 35519372]
  5. RSC Adv. 2018 Aug 3;8(49):27709-27724 [PMID: 35542721]
  6. Biomaterials. 2007 Nov;28(32):4845-69 [PMID: 17686513]
  7. Materials (Basel). 2015 Sep 01;8(9):5834-5846 [PMID: 28793537]
  8. Chem Rev. 2017 Aug 9;117(15):10212-10290 [PMID: 28756658]
  9. Biomaterials. 2003 Aug;24(18):3115-23 [PMID: 12895584]
  10. Materials (Basel). 2018 Feb 12;11(2): [PMID: 29439511]
  11. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014 May 1;38:55-62 [PMID: 24656352]
  12. ACS Omega. 2018 Nov 09;3(11):15205-15216 [PMID: 31458183]
  13. Nanoscale. 2017 May 4;9(17):5458-5466 [PMID: 28422253]
  14. ACS Omega. 2019 Nov 19;4(23):20297-20307 [PMID: 31815232]
  15. Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 24;10(1):3310 [PMID: 32094354]
  16. ACS Omega. 2017 Oct 31;2(10):6446-6454 [PMID: 30023519]
  17. Environ Pollut. 1996;91(2):245-52 [PMID: 15091446]
  18. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Apr;12(3):300-314 [PMID: 28152642]
  19. Polymers (Basel). 2018 Mar 13;10(3): [PMID: 30966349]
  20. Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Feb 2;50(3):1260-8 [PMID: 26741485]
  21. Sci Adv. 2018 Dec 14;4(12):eaat4967 [PMID: 30555914]
  22. Environ Int. 2019 Feb;123:476-485 [PMID: 30622073]
  23. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2017 Jan-Mar;15(1):10-18 [PMID: 28134971]
  24. ACS Omega. 2018 Apr 23;3(4):4400-4411 [PMID: 31458666]
  25. Int J Pharm. 2017 Aug 30;529(1-2):285-293 [PMID: 28668582]
  26. Polym Adv Technol. 2011 Apr;22(5):502-511 [PMID: 25473252]
  27. Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Oct 15;53(20):12054-12061 [PMID: 31513393]
  28. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014 Jul;85(7):758-63 [PMID: 25022166]
  29. Materials (Basel). 2018 Jan 30;11(2): [PMID: 29385756]
  30. J Biomater Appl. 2016 Jul;31(1):132-9 [PMID: 26980549]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0printing3DmaterialsETlimitationsautomotiveflamethermalmanyadaptationindustriesapplicationsmechanicalanisotropicpropertiesperformancesretardancystabilityelectricalconductivityshortcomingsresearchedengineeringincreasedimproveadditivemanufacturingchallengeswithinthree-dimensionalhinderbiomedicalcosmeticprocessingaerospaceelectronicsdisadvantagesincludeinabilitypartsfunctionweight-bearingreducedperformanceprintedproductslimitedintrinsicmaterialand/orManypreventedproductdevelopmentespeciallynovelsoldcommerciallycaseshigh-performancethermoplasticsprovidebasisaddressselectivelasersinteringextrusionfirststrategycombatfabricateblendscompositesNovelimplementedreducelossesstrengthAdditivesretardantsgeneraterobustV0ratingscompatibilizerscandimensionalserveelectronicindustrybetteradditioncarbonblack4wt%matrixfoundfivetimesmagnitudeSurfacemodificationsphotopolymerizationimprovedusabilitywhereasdynamicchemicalprocessesbiocompatibilitymedicaldeviceThermalresistantfoampolyamide12flyashspheresfabricatedpossibleinsulationworksothersgeneratedgreatpotentialtechnologiesalsoprovidedsolutionscriticalRecentadvancesthermoplastics:opportunities

Similar Articles

Cited By