Implementation of maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) in humanitarian settings: insights and experiences of humanitarian health practitioners and global technical expert meeting attendees.

Neal Russell, Hannah Tappis, Jean Paul Mwanga, Benjamin Black, Kusum Thapa, Endang Handzel, Elaine Scudder, Ribka Amsalu, Jyoti Reddi, Francesca Palestra, Allisyn C Moran
Author Information
  1. Neal Russell: , London, UK. nrussell@sgul.ac.uk. ORCID
  2. Hannah Tappis: Jhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  3. Jean Paul Mwanga: Hôpital Générale de Mweso, Nord Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
  4. Benjamin Black: Médecins Sans Frontières, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  5. Kusum Thapa: Jhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  6. Endang Handzel: Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  7. Elaine Scudder: International Rescue Committee, New York, NY, USA.
  8. Ribka Amsalu: University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  9. Jyoti Reddi: World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  10. Francesca Palestra: World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  11. Allisyn C Moran: World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) is a system of identifying, analysing and learning lessons from such deaths in order to respond and prevent future deaths, and has been recommended by WHO and implemented in many low-and-middle income settings in recent years. However, there is limited documentation of experience with MPDSR in humanitarian settings. A meeting on MPDSR in humanitarian settings was convened by WHO, UNICEF, CDC and Save the Children, UNFPA and UNHCR on 17th-18th October 2019, informed by semi-structured interviews with a range of professionals, including expert attendees.
CONSULTATION FINDINGS: Interviewees revealed significant obstacles to full implementation of the MPDSR process in humanitarian settings. Many obstacles were familiar to low resource settings in general but were amplified in the context of a humanitarian crisis, such as overburdened services, disincentives to reporting, accountability gaps, a blame approach, and politicisation of mortality. Factors more unique to humanitarian contexts included concerns about health worker security and moral distress. There are varying levels of institutionalisation and implementation capacity for MPDSR within humanitarian organisations. It is suggested that if poorly implemented, particularly with a punitive or blame approach, MPDSR may be counterproductive. Nevertheless, successes in MPDSR were described whereby the process led to concrete actions to prevent deaths, and where death reviews have led to improved understanding of complex and rectifiable contextual factors leading to deaths in humanitarian settings.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the challenges, examples exist where the lessons learnt from MPDSR processes have led to improved access and quality of care in humanitarian contexts, including successful advocacy. An adapted approach is required to ensure feasibility, with varying implementation being possible in different phases of crises. There is a need for guidance on MPDSR in humanitarian contexts, and for greater documentation and learning from experiences.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Apr;105(1):82-5 [PMID: 19232603]
  2. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 May;5(5): [PMID: 32371572]
  3. Lancet. 2017 Nov 18;390(10109):2287-2296 [PMID: 28602563]
  4. Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Feb 1;94(2):86-91 [PMID: 26908958]
  5. Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Jun 1;93(6):424-8 [PMID: 26240464]
  6. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Oct;107 Suppl 1:S113-21, S121-2 [PMID: 19815206]
  7. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):233 [PMID: 28716124]
  8. BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jun 24;4(Suppl 4):e001300 [PMID: 31297253]
  9. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 May;5(5):e545-e555 [PMID: 28395847]
  10. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15 Suppl 2:S9 [PMID: 26391558]
  11. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Sep 28;5(3):333-337 [PMID: 28963168]
  12. Lancet. 2013 Jul 13;382(9887):146-57 [PMID: 23721752]
  13. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;38(4):205-13 [PMID: 23318170]
  14. J Trop Pediatr. 2017 Jun 1;63(3):189-195 [PMID: 27789662]
  15. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 May 16;17(1):145 [PMID: 28511722]
  16. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 May;27(2):1610275 [PMID: 31533592]
  17. Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;239:112526 [PMID: 31520880]
  18. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Sep 29;16(1):291 [PMID: 27687243]
  19. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1993;36(4):239-43 [PMID: 8300010]
  20. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Dec 16;11:102 [PMID: 22171988]
  21. Public Health Action. 2017 Jun 21;7(2):168-174 [PMID: 28695092]
  22. Confl Health. 2009 Sep 10;3:8 [PMID: 19744319]
  23. BMJ Glob Health. 2018 May 03;3(3):e000640 [PMID: 29736275]
  24. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 19;14(9):e0222583 [PMID: 31536573]
  25. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 25;3:CD012982 [PMID: 32212268]
  26. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Aug;126(2):111-4 [PMID: 24834852]
  27. East Mediterr Health J. 2015 Feb 02;20(12):789-95 [PMID: 25664517]
  28. BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 22;21(1):390 [PMID: 33618684]
  29. Health Policy Plan. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):78-90 [PMID: 31697378]
  30. Confl Health. 2014 May 20;8:8 [PMID: 24959198]
  31. PLoS Med. 2008 Jul 1;5(7):e146 [PMID: 18597552]
  32. Lancet Planet Health. 2020 Oct;4(10):e483-e495 [PMID: 33038321]
  33. Health Policy Plan. 2017 Nov 1;32(suppl_3):iii32-iii39 [PMID: 29149310]
  34. Health Policy Plan. 2018 Dec 1;33(10):1107-1117 [PMID: 30534942]

Grants

  1. 001/World Health Organization
  2. T32 HD098057/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0humanitarianMPDSRsettingsdeathsdeathimplementationapproachcontextsledMaternalperinatalsurveillanceresponselearninglessonspreventWHOimplementeddocumentationmeetingincludingexpertattendeesobstaclesprocessblamehealthvaryingimprovedexperiencesBACKGROUND:systemidentifyinganalysingorderrespondfuturerecommendedmanylow-and-middleincomerecentyearsHoweverlimitedexperienceconvenedUNICEFCDCSaveChildrenUNFPAUNHCR17th-18thOctober2019informedsemi-structuredinterviewsrangeprofessionalsCONSULTATIONFINDINGS:IntervieweesrevealedsignificantfullManyfamiliarlowresourcegeneralamplifiedcontextcrisisoverburdenedservicesdisincentivesreportingaccountabilitygapspoliticisationmortalityFactorsuniqueincludedconcernsworkersecuritymoraldistresslevelsinstitutionalisationcapacitywithinorganisationssuggestedpoorlyparticularlypunitivemaycounterproductiveNeverthelesssuccessesdescribedwherebyconcreteactionsreviewsunderstandingcomplexrectifiablecontextualfactorsleadingCONCLUSIONS:DespitechallengesexamplesexistlearntprocessesaccessqualitycaresuccessfuladvocacyadaptedrequiredensurefeasibilitypossibledifferentphasescrisesneedguidancegreaterImplementationmaternalsettings:insightspractitionersglobaltechnicalHumanitarianMortalityPerinatalResponseReviewSurveillance

Similar Articles

Cited By