Having Heart: Affective and Cognitive Empathy Scores vs. Residency Specialty Match at an Osteopathic Medical School.

Bruce W Newton
Author Information
  1. Bruce W Newton: Department of Anatomy, Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC 27546 USA. ORCID

Abstract

Background: Past studies examining the Cognitive Empathy of medical school graduates grouped the various residency selections vs. parsing them out. This study examines both affective and Cognitive Empathy scores of osteopathic medical school graduates entering eleven different residency specialties.
Methods: Participants from the Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of osteopathic Medicine (CUSOM) classes of 2017-2019 completed the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES; measuring affective empathy) and the Jefferson Scale of Empathy, Student version (JSE-S; measuring Cognitive Empathy). Empathy scores were compared to residency choice upon graduation. The specialty choices were broken into two groups: Core specialties (i.e., people-oriented) that include Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/Gyn), Pediatrics, and Psychiatry. The remaining specialties are considered Non-Core specialties (i.e., technical/procedure-oriented) and included Anesthesiology, Diagnostic Radiology, Emergency Medicine, General Surgery, Neurology, and Orthopedics. Results are compared to data from the nationwide Project in osteopathic Medical Education and Empathy (POMEE).
Results: women graduates tended to have larger BEES and JSE-S scores than men. Affective empathy scores were the largest for students selecting Core specialties. Four of these Core specialties were in the top four positions out of the eleven specialties selected by eight or more graduates. None of the eleven specialties was ranked higher than the 50th percentile compared to BEES score norms. Cognitive Empathy scores were also the largest for students selecting Core specialties. All five of the Core specialties were in the top six positions out of the eleven specialties. None of the eleven specialties ranked greater than the 39th percentile when compared to OMS-III and OMS-IV POMEE data. Only women entering Psychiatry had a JSE-S score that was greater than the 50th percentile.
Conclusions: osteopathic graduates selecting the five Core specialties have BEES and JSE-S scores that are, usually, larger than students entering Non-Core specialties. For either survey instrument, both Pediatrics and Family Medicine were first and second out of a possible 11 positions, respectively. Most CUSOM graduates had JSE-S scores lower than their peers in other osteopathic medical schools that participated in the POMEE study. When the CUSOM data are compared to allopathic data, there is no clear evidence that osteopathic students have substantially higher affective or Cognitive Empathy scores than their allopathic peers. Therefore, it appears that medical students who select osteopathy for its tenant of a more holistic approach to patient care are no more empathetic than students studying allopathic medicine. Several suggestions are made on how to potentially increase student empathy during undergraduate medical education.

Keywords

References

  1. Curr Rev Pain. 2000;4(1):24-30 [PMID: 10998712]
  2. Dev Neurosci. 2010;32(4):257-67 [PMID: 20805682]
  3. Neuroimage. 2010 May 1;50(4):1676-82 [PMID: 20080194]
  4. J Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;145(6):663-72 [PMID: 16334513]
  5. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 14;9:2584 [PMID: 30618998]
  6. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec;85(3):390-7 [PMID: 21300514]
  7. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;159(9):1563-9 [PMID: 12202278]
  8. Bioethics. 2022 Jun;36(5):486-493 [PMID: 34897754]
  9. Int J Med Educ. 2016 Sep 06;7:286-92 [PMID: 27608488]
  10. Med Educ. 2020 Jun;54(6):571-581 [PMID: 32083747]
  11. Novartis Found Symp. 2007;278:71-80; discussion 80-96, 216-21 [PMID: 17214311]
  12. Behav Brain Sci. 1997 Sep;20(3):371-80; discussion 435-513 [PMID: 10097000]
  13. Acad Med. 2008 Mar;83(3):244-9 [PMID: 18316868]
  14. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 11;7:233 [PMID: 23781181]
  15. Int J Med Educ. 2021 Nov 19;12:222-232 [PMID: 34807000]
  16. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1969 Jun;33(3):307-16 [PMID: 4389335]
  17. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2019 Aug 01;119(8):520-532 [PMID: 31355891]
  18. Acad Med. 2006 Apr;81(4):354-73 [PMID: 16565188]
  19. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2018 Apr 30;5:2382120518771352 [PMID: 29780888]
  20. Acad Med. 2011 Mar;86(3):359-64 [PMID: 21248604]
  21. Med Teach. 2002 Jul;24(4):370-3 [PMID: 12193318]
  22. Science. 2004 Feb 20;303(5661):1157-62 [PMID: 14976305]
  23. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013 Dec;113(12):898-907 [PMID: 24285032]
  24. Acad Med. 2012 Sep;87(9):1243-9 [PMID: 22836852]
  25. Psychiatr Danub. 2012 Jun;24(2):175-81 [PMID: 22706416]
  26. BMC Med Educ. 2011 Jul 29;11:52 [PMID: 21801365]
  27. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2009 Spring;31(4):412-50 [PMID: 19385420]
  28. JAMA. 1997 Feb 19;277(7):553-9 [PMID: 9032162]
  29. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Oct;46 Pt 4:604-27 [PMID: 25236781]
  30. Int J Med Educ. 2016 May 21;7:149-53 [PMID: 27213505]
  31. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:81-96 [PMID: 19338504]
  32. Acad Med. 2011 Aug;86(8):996-1009 [PMID: 21670661]
  33. Acad Med. 2014 Aug;89(8):1108-12 [PMID: 24826853]
  34. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Dec;23(5):899-920 [PMID: 29968006]
  35. CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1423-33 [PMID: 7728691]
  36. Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1464-1471 [PMID: 28379929]
  37. Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jun;101(6):1143-1146 [PMID: 29395476]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0specialtiesempathyscoresEmpathystudentsgraduatesCoremedicalelevenMedicineJSE-ScomparedcognitiveOsteopathicScaleBEESdataresidencyaffectiveosteopathicenteringCUSOMMedicalPOMEEAffectiveselectingpositionspercentileCognitiveallopathicschoolvsstudySchoolBalancedEmotionalmeasuringJeffersonchoiceieFamilyPediatricsPsychiatryNon-CorelargerlargesttopNonerankedhigher50thscorefivegreaterpeersResidencyBackground:PaststudiesexamininggroupedvariousselectionsparsingexaminesdifferentMethods:ParticipantsCampbellUniversityJerryMWallaceclasses2017-2019completedStudentversionupongraduationspecialtychoicesbrokentwogroups:people-orientedincludeInternalObstetricsGynecologyOB/Gynremainingconsideredtechnical/procedure-orientedincludedAnesthesiologyDiagnosticRadiologyEmergencyGeneralSurgeryNeurologyOrthopedicsResultsnationwideProjectEducationResults:WomentendedmenFourfourselectedeightnormsalsosix39thOMS-IIIOMS-IVwomenConclusions:usuallyeithersurveyinstrumentfirstsecondpossible11respectivelylowerschoolsparticipatedclearevidencesubstantiallyThereforeappearsselectosteopathytenantholisticapproachpatientcareempatheticstudyingmedicineSeveralsuggestionsmadepotentiallyincreasestudentundergraduateeducationHeart:ScoresSpecialtyMatch

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.