Analysis and Prediction of Influencing Factors of College Student Achievement Based on Machine Learning.

Dongxuan Wang, Dapeng Lian, Yazhou Xing, Shiying Dong, Xinyu Sun, Jia Yu
Author Information
  1. Dongxuan Wang: Department of Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Huanghua, China.
  2. Dapeng Lian: College of Humanities and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, Huanghua, China.
  3. Yazhou Xing: College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China.
  4. Shiying Dong: Department of Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Huanghua, China.
  5. Xinyu Sun: Department of Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Huanghua, China.
  6. Jia Yu: Department of Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Huanghua, China.

Abstract

To effectively improve students' performance and help educators monitor students' learning situations, many colleges are committed to establishing systems that explore the influencing factors and predict student academic performance. However, because different colleges have different situations, the previous research results may not be applicable to ordinary Chinese colleges. This paper has two main objectives: to analyze the fluctuation of Chinese ordinary college student academic performance and to establish systems to predict performance. First, according to previous research results and the current situation of Chinese college students, a questionnaire was designed to collect data. Second, the chi-square test was used to analyze the contents of the questionnaire and identify the main features. Third, taking the main features as input, four classification prediction models are established by machine learning. Some traits of the students who did not pass all the examinations were also discovered. It might help student counselors and educators to take targeted measures. The experiment shows that the support vector machine classifier (SVC) model has the best and most stable effect. The average recall rate, precision rate, and accuracy rate reached 82.83%, 86.18%, and 80.96%, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 24;12:757496 [PMID: 35140650]
  2. J R Soc Interface. 2018 Sep 19;15(146): [PMID: 30232241]
  3. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 07;11:552355 [PMID: 33162905]
  4. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Mar 9;14(1):29 [PMID: 28274260]
  5. Am J Health Promot. 2014 May-Jun;28(5):298-305 [PMID: 23941106]
  6. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jan 04;2022:9422299 [PMID: 35039794]
  7. Entropy (Basel). 2019 Dec 20;22(1): [PMID: 33285787]
  8. Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):322-38 [PMID: 19254083]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0performancestudentlearningcollegesacademicChinesemaincollegemachineratestudents'helpeducatorssituationssystemsfactorspredictdifferentpreviousresearchresultsordinaryanalyzestudentsquestionnairechi-squaretestfeaturespredictionanalysiseffectivelyimprovemonitormanycommittedestablishingexploreinfluencingHowevermayapplicablepapertwoobjectives:fluctuationestablishFirstaccordingcurrentsituationdesignedcollectdataSecondusedcontentsidentifyThirdtakinginputfourclassificationmodelsestablishedtraitspassexaminationsalsodiscoveredmightcounselorstaketargetedmeasuresexperimentshowssupportvectorclassifierSVCmodelbeststableeffectaveragerecallprecisionaccuracyreached8283%8618%8096%respectivelyAnalysisPredictionInfluencingFactorsCollegeStudentAchievementBasedMachineLearning

Similar Articles

Cited By