A cross-sectional survey of smoking and cessation support policies in a sample of homeless services in the United Kingdom.

Sharon Cox, Jaimi Murray, Allison Ford, Lucy Holmes, Deborah Robson, Lynne Dawkins
Author Information
  1. Sharon Cox: Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK. s.cox@ucl.ac.uk.
  2. Jaimi Murray: Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research, London South Bank University, London, UK.
  3. Allison Ford: Institute of Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
  4. Lucy Holmes: Alcohol Change UKGroundswell, London, UK.
  5. Deborah Robson: Spectrum Research Consortium, London, UK.
  6. Lynne Dawkins: Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research, London South Bank University, London, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smoking is extremely common amongst adults experiencing homelessness. To date, there is no nationally representative data on how tobacco dependence is treated and if and how smoking cessation is supported across the homeless sector. The aim of this study was to document smoking and e-cigarette policies of UK homeless services and identify areas of good practice and where improvements could be made.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey with homeless centre staff was conducted between June 2020-December 2020 totalling 99 homeless centres. Quotas were stratified based on population and service type across Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales, and England. Interviews were conducted over the phone or online in a minority of cases. Survey questions were themed to assess, i) onsite smoking and e-cigarette (vaping) policies ii) screening and recording of smoking status, iii) cessation training and resources available to staff, iv) cessation support for service users.
RESULTS: 92% accounted for smoking within their policies in some form (stand-alone policy (56%) or embedded within another health and safety policy (36%)). 84% allowed smoking in at least some (indoor and outdoor) areas. In areas where smoking was not allowed, vaping was also disallowed in 96% of cases. Staff smoking rates were 23% and 62% of centres reported staff smoked with service users. Just over half (52%) reported screening and recording smoking status and 58% made referrals to Stop Smoking Services (SSS), although established links with SSS were low (12%) and most centres did not provide staff training on supporting smoking cessation. Areas of good practice included regular offers of smoking cessation support embedded in routine health reviews or visits from SSS and offering tangible harm reduction support. Areas for improvement include staff training, staff smoking with service users and skipping routine screening questions around smoking.
CONCLUSIONS: Smoking is accounted for across different policy types and restricted in some areas within most settings. Smoking cessation support is not routinely offered across the sector and there is little involvement with the SSS.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet. 2006 Jul 29;368(9533):367-70 [PMID: 16876664]
  2. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Apr;8(2):287-96 [PMID: 16766421]
  3. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Jun 12;22(7):1235-1238 [PMID: 31586403]
  4. Lancet. 2013 Feb 16;381(9866):585-97 [PMID: 23410608]
  5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 31;5:CD000146 [PMID: 29852054]
  6. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Sep 1;154:105-10 [PMID: 26160458]
  7. Harm Reduct J. 2021 Aug 31;18(1):95 [PMID: 34465346]
  8. Am J Health Behav. 2014 Mar;38(2):161-9 [PMID: 24629545]
  9. BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 24;9(4):e025192 [PMID: 31023754]
  10. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1:CD013229 [PMID: 33411338]
  11. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 29;4:CD010216 [PMID: 33913154]
  12. BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693 [PMID: 32094110]
  13. Addiction. 1999 Jul;94(7):961-72 [PMID: 10707430]
  14. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 23;15(10):e0240968 [PMID: 33095798]
  15. Addict Behav. 2019 Aug;95:35-40 [PMID: 30831339]
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 14;10:CD010216 [PMID: 33052602]
  17. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12:CD013413 [PMID: 33284989]
  18. Health Promot J Austr. 2017 Aug;28(2):160-164 [PMID: 27321708]
  19. Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jan;51:10-17 [PMID: 29144995]
  20. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1248:107-23 [PMID: 22092035]

Grants

  1. 29846/Cancer Research UK
  2. C64552/A29846/Cancer Research UK

MeSH Term

Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
Ill-Housed Persons
Humans
Policy
Smoking
United Kingdom

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0smokingcessationSmokingstaffhomelesssupportacrosspoliciesareasserviceSSScentresscreeningtraininguserswithinpolicysectore-cigaretteservicesgoodpracticemadecross-sectionalsurveyconductedcasesSurveyquestionsvapingrecordingstatusaccountedembeddedhealthallowedreportedAreasroutinereductionBACKGROUND:extremelycommonamongstadultsexperiencinghomelessnessdatenationallyrepresentativedatatobaccodependencetreatedsupportedaimstudydocumentUKidentifyimprovementsMETHODS:centreJune2020-December2020totalling99QuotasstratifiedbasedpopulationtypeScotlandNorthernIrelandWalesEnglandInterviewsphoneonlineminoritythemedassessonsiteiiiiiresourcesavailableivRESULTS:92%form stand-alone56%anothersafety36%84%leastindooroutdooralsodisallowed96%Staffrates23%62%smokedJusthalf52%58%referralsStopServicesalthoughestablishedlinkslow12%providesupportingincludedregularoffersreviewsvisitsofferingtangibleharmimprovementincludeskippingaroundCONCLUSIONS:differenttypesrestrictedsettingsroutinelyofferedlittleinvolvementsampleUnitedKingdomE-cigaretteHarmHomelessnessPoliciesTobaccoVaping

Similar Articles

Cited By