Coordinated Health in Texas Elementary Schools' Campus Improvement Plans: Analysis of Regional Differences and Trends between 2016 and 2020.

Sarah Classen, Jacob Szeszulski, Nalini Ranjit, Genesis Rivas-Ponce, Deanna M Hoelscher
Author Information
  1. Sarah Classen: Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Austin, TX 78701, USA. ORCID
  2. Jacob Szeszulski: Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Austin, TX 78701, USA. ORCID
  3. Nalini Ranjit: Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Austin, TX 78701, USA.
  4. Genesis Rivas-Ponce: Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Austin, TX 78701, USA.
  5. Deanna M Hoelscher: Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Austin, TX 78701, USA.

Abstract

Schools signal health priorities through policies. Using a repeated cross-sectional study design, we compare the presence and strength of policies related to four topics-physical activity, nutrition, mental health, and bullying-described in elementary school Campus Improvement Plans (CIPs; also called school improvement plans) within Texas, across four Texas Public Health Regions (PHRs), and between 2016 and 2020. CIPs were collected using a multi-stage probability-based survey approach, scored using an adapted WellSAT tool, and analyzed to determine associations between PHR or year and health topic. Across 170 CIPs, bullying was the most frequently addressed topic, followed by mental health, physical activity, and nutrition. On average, schools addressed 2.7 ± 1.3 topics within their CIP; 38.2% of schools addressed all four, 26.5% addressed three, 12.4% addressed two, 15.3% addressed one, and 7.6% addressed none. CIPs in the same district had high levels of clustering (ICCs = 0.28-0.55). The mostly rural Panhandle PHR included the fewest topics in their CIPs and used the weakest policy language. Between 2016 and 2020, there was a decrease in the proportion of CIPs that addressed nutrition; the strength of language for mental health and bullying also decreased. Regional and time trends reveal opportunities for more robust school health policy interventions.

Keywords

References

  1. J Public Health Policy. 2009;30 Suppl 1:S221-47 [PMID: 19190576]
  2. Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 18;7:158 [PMID: 31275915]
  3. J Sch Health. 2018 Sep;88(9):627-635 [PMID: 30133773]
  4. J Phys Act Health. 2021 Feb 13;18(3):310-317 [PMID: 33581685]
  5. J Rural Health. 2013 Winter;29(1):97-105 [PMID: 23289660]
  6. Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):e261-6 [PMID: 19171578]
  7. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):304-8 [PMID: 22898124]
  8. J Sch Health. 2021 Jul;91(7):562-573 [PMID: 33954996]
  9. BMC Psychol. 2017 Dec 12;5(1):38 [PMID: 29233173]
  10. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Feb;23(2):72-82 [PMID: 31977251]
  11. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 May;49(5):368-379.e1 [PMID: 28189500]
  12. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;52(8):766-774 [PMID: 32276880]
  13. J Sch Health. 2012 Jun;82(6):262-7 [PMID: 22568461]
  14. Prev Sci. 2019 Aug;20(6):914-935 [PMID: 31152328]
  15. Front Public Health. 2015 Apr 28;3:63 [PMID: 25973413]
  16. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Oct;18(5):605-623 [PMID: 32291699]
  17. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1122-1129 [PMID: 32634356]
  18. Health Promot Perspect. 2020 Nov 07;10(4):316-324 [PMID: 33312927]
  19. J Sch Health. 2016 Sep;86(9):631-7 [PMID: 27492931]
  20. J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Sep 1;40(3):591-597 [PMID: 29036317]
  21. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jan;19(1):26-35 [PMID: 25990324]

Grants

  1. T32/CA057712/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Cross-Sectional Studies
Health Policy
Health Promotion
Nutrition Policy
Schools
Texas

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0addressedhealthCIPsnutritionmentalschoolfouractivityTexas20162020bullyingschoolspolicypoliciesstrengthCampusImprovementalsoimprovementplanswithinHealthusingPHRtopicphysical7topicslanguageRegionalSchoolssignalprioritiesUsingrepeatedcross-sectionalstudydesigncomparepresencerelatedtopics-physicalbullying-describedelementaryPlanscalledacrossPublicRegionsPHRscollectedmulti-stageprobability-basedsurveyapproachscoredadaptedWellSATtoolanalyzeddetermineassociationsyearAcross170frequentlyfollowedaverage2±13CIP382%265%three124%two153%one6%nonedistricthighlevelsclusteringICCs=028-055mostlyruralPanhandleincludedfewestusedweakestdecreaseproportiondecreasedtimetrendsrevealopportunitiesrobustinterventionsCoordinatedElementarySchools'Plans:AnalysisDifferencesTrendschildrenadolescents

Similar Articles

Cited By