Vaccine Hesitancy and Betrayal Aversion.

Abdelaziz Alsharawy, Esha Dwibedi, Jason Aimone, Sheryl Ball
Author Information
  1. Abdelaziz Alsharawy: School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
  2. Esha Dwibedi: Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
  3. Jason Aimone: Department of Economics, Baylor University, Waco, TX, 76798, USA.
  4. Sheryl Ball: Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA. sball@vt.edu. ORCID

Abstract

The determinants of vaccine hesitancy remain complex and context specific. Betrayal aversion occurs when an individual is hesitant to risk being betrayed in an environment involving trust. In this pre-registered vignette experiment, we show that betrayal aversion is not captured by current vaccine hesitancy measures despite representing a significant source of unwillingness to be vaccinated. Our survey instrument was administered to 888 United States residents via Amazon Mechanical Turk in March 2021. We find that over a third of participants have betrayal averse preferences, resulting in an 8-26% decline in vaccine acceptance, depending on the betrayal source. Interestingly, attributing betrayal risk to scientists or government results in the greatest declines in vaccine acceptance. We explore an exogenous message intervention and show that an otherwise effective message acts narrowly and fails to reduce betrayal aversion. Our results demonstrate the importance of betrayal aversion as a preference construct in the decision to vaccinate.

Keywords

References

  1. Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):e835-42 [PMID: 24590751]
  2. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Mar;5(3):337-348 [PMID: 33547453]
  3. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 7;13(12):e0208601 [PMID: 30532274]
  4. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(1):72-82 [PMID: 25483518]
  5. Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4 [PMID: 25896383]
  6. Vaccine. 2014 Apr 17;32(19):2150-9 [PMID: 24598724]
  7. Vaccine. 2016 Sep 22;34(41):4964-4968 [PMID: 27566902]
  8. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2025594 [PMID: 33079199]
  9. EBioMedicine. 2016 Oct;12:295-301 [PMID: 27658738]
  10. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 02;10(9):e0137491 [PMID: 26331944]
  11. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 May;159(5):470-6 [PMID: 15867122]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 18;118(20): [PMID: 33926993]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 30;118(13): [PMID: 33753521]
  14. Biosecur Bioterror. 2013 Jun;11(2):96-106 [PMID: 23617721]
  15. Vaccine. 2021 Jan 29;39(5):825-829 [PMID: 33390295]
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 30;118(13): [PMID: 33753515]
  17. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Nov;167(11):1065-71 [PMID: 24061681]
  18. Vaccine. 2011 Sep 2;29(38):6598-605 [PMID: 21763384]

Grants

  1. 1541105/National Science Foundation

MeSH Term

Betrayal
Humans
Surveys and Questionnaires
Trust
United States
Vaccination Hesitancy
Vaccines

Chemicals

Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0betrayalvaccineaversionhesitancyBetrayalriskshowsourceacceptanceresultsmessagedeterminantsremaincomplexcontextspecificoccursindividualhesitantbetrayedenvironmentinvolvingtrustpre-registeredvignetteexperimentcapturedcurrentmeasuresdespiterepresentingsignificantunwillingnessvaccinatedsurveyinstrumentadministered888UnitedStatesresidentsviaAmazonMechanicalTurkMarch2021findthirdparticipantsaversepreferencesresulting8-26%declinedependingInterestinglyattributingscientistsgovernmentgreatestdeclinesexploreexogenousinterventionotherwiseeffectiveactsnarrowlyfailsreducedemonstrateimportancepreferenceconstructdecisionvaccinateVaccineHesitancyAversionCOVID-19HealthbehaviorPersuasivemessages

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)