Evolution of cooperation and trust in an N-player social dilemma game with tags for migration decisions.

Sandeep Dhakal, Raymond Chiong, Manuel Chica, The Anh Han
Author Information
  1. Sandeep Dhakal: School of Information and Physical Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia. ORCID
  2. Raymond Chiong: School of Information and Physical Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia. ORCID
  3. Manuel Chica: School of Information and Physical Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia. ORCID
  4. The Anh Han: Department of Computing and Games, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley, UK. ORCID

Abstract

We present an evolutionary game model that integrates the concept of tags, trust and migration to study how trust in social and physical groups influence cooperation and migration decisions. All agents have a tag, and they gain or lose trust in other tags as they interact with other agents. This trust in different tags determines their trust in other players and groups. In contrast to other models in the literature, our model does not use tags to determine the cooperation/defection decisions of the agents, but rather their migration decisions. Agents decide whether to cooperate or defect based purely on social learning (i.e. imitation from others). Agents use information about tags and their trust in tags to determine how much they trust a particular group of agents and whether they want to migrate to that group. Comprehensive experiments show that the model can promote high levels of cooperation and trust under different game scenarios, and that curbing the migration decisions of agents can negatively impact both cooperation and trust in the system. We also observed that trust becomes scarce in the system as the diversity of tags increases. This work is one of the first to study the impact of tags on trust in the system and migration behaviour of the agents using evolutionary game theory.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Oct 20;2(10):e140 [PMID: 17054392]
  2. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Jun;87(6):062136 [PMID: 23848656]
  3. J R Soc Interface. 2021 Feb;18(175):20200880 [PMID: 33561377]
  4. R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Oct 17;5(10):181085 [PMID: 30473853]
  5. J Theor Biol. 2009 Oct 21;260(4):581-8 [PMID: 19616013]
  6. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Oct;88(4):042806 [PMID: 24229225]
  7. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 24;9(1):19789 [PMID: 31874960]
  8. J R Soc Interface. 2013 Aug 21;10(88):20130544 [PMID: 23966616]
  9. Phys Rev E. 2019 Dec;100(6-1):062302 [PMID: 31962486]
  10. J Theor Biol. 2009 Mar 21;257(2):331-9 [PMID: 19135062]
  11. Phys Life Rev. 2015 Sep;14:1-30 [PMID: 25979121]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 1;97(16):9340-6 [PMID: 10922082]
  13. J R Soc Interface. 2020 Aug;17(169):20200491 [PMID: 32781937]
  14. Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1560-3 [PMID: 17158317]
  15. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Jun;85(6 Pt 2):066104 [PMID: 23005159]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trusttagsmigrationagentscooperationdecisionsgamemodelsocialsystemevolutionarystudygroupsdifferentusedetermineAgentswhethergroupcanimpactN-playerpresentintegratesconceptphysicalinfluencetaggainloseinteractdeterminesplayerscontrastmodelsliteraturecooperation/defectionratherdecidecooperatedefectbasedpurelylearningieimitationothersinformationmuchparticularwantmigrateComprehensiveexperimentsshowpromotehighlevelsscenarioscurbingnegativelyalsoobservedbecomesscarcediversityincreasesworkonefirstbehaviourusingtheoryEvolutiondilemmagamesevolution

Similar Articles

Cited By