Well-being app to support young people during the COVID-19 pandemic: randomised controlled trial.

Hiran Thabrew, Anna Lynette Boggiss, David Lim, Kiralee Schache, Eva Morunga, Nic Cao, Alana Cavadino, Anna Sofia Serlachius
Author Information
  1. Hiran Thabrew: Department of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand h.thabrew@auckland.ac.nz. ORCID
  2. Anna Lynette Boggiss: Department of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. ORCID
  3. David Lim: Department of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  4. Kiralee Schache: Department of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  5. Eva Morunga: Department of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  6. Nic Cao: Department of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  7. Alana Cavadino: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  8. Anna Sofia Serlachius: Department of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of 'Whitu: seven ways in seven days', a well-being application (app) for young people.
DESIGN: Prospective randomised controlled trial of Whitu against waitlist control, with 45 Participants in each arm.
Participants: 90 New Zealand young people aged 16-30 recruited via a social media advertising campaign.
SETTING: Participants' homes.
INTERVENTIONS: Developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and refined from a prototype version that was evaluated during a smaller qualitative study, 'Whitu: seven ways in seven days' is a well-being app that, as its name suggests, contains seven modules to help young people (1) recognise and rate emotions, (2) learn relaxation and mindfulness, (3) practice self-compassion and (4) gratitude, (5) connect with others, (6) care for their physical health and (7) engage in goal-setting. It can be completed within a week or as desired.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were changes in well-being on the WHO 5-item Well-Being Index and Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale. Secondary outcomes were changes in depression on the Centre for Epidemiological Studies depression Scale, anxiety on the Generalised anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale, self-compassion on the Self Compassion Scale-Short Form, stress on the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale, sleep on the single-item Sleep Quality Scale and user engagement on the end-user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale and via qualitative feedback during an online survey. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline, 4 weeks (primary study endpoint) and 3 months, and analysed using linear mixed models with group, time and a group-time interaction.
RESULTS: At 4 weeks, Participants in the Whitu group experienced significantly higher emotional (Mean difference (md) 13.19 (3.96 to 22.42); p=0.005) and mental (md 2.44 (0.27 to 4.61); p=0.027) well-being, self-compassion (md 0.56 (0.28 to 0.83); p<0.001) and sleep (md 1.13 (0.24 to 2.02); p=0.018), and significantly lower stress (md -4.69 (-7.61 to -1.76); p=0.002) and depression (md -5.34 (-10.14 to -0.53); p=0.030), compared with the waitlist controls. Group differences remained statistically significant at 3 months for all outcomes. Symptoms of anxiety were also lower in the intervention group at 4 weeks (p=0.096), with statistically significant differences at 3 months (md -2.31 (-4.54 to -0.08); p=0.042). Usability of Whitu was high (subjective ratings of 4.45 (0.72) and 4.38 (0.79) out of 5 at 4 weeks and 3 months, respectively) and qualitative feedback indicated individual and cultural acceptability of the app.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the evolving psychological burden of the COVID-19 pandemic, Whitu could provide a clinically effective and scalable means of improving the well-being, mental health and resilience of young people. Replication of current findings with younger individuals and in other settings is planned.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000516987).

Keywords

Associated Data

ANZCTR | ACTRN12620000516987

References

  1. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 25;21(9):e14567 [PMID: 31573916]
  2. Psychiatry Res. 2017 Sep;255:382-386 [PMID: 28666244]
  3. Scand J Public Health. 2018 Nov;46(7):718-725 [PMID: 29017402]
  4. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jan;88(1):1-13 [PMID: 31697093]
  5. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Jul-Aug;47(4):542-554 [PMID: 26983904]
  6. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:565688 [PMID: 33071893]
  7. Behav Res Ther. 2019 Dec;123:103498 [PMID: 31707224]
  8. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;29(4):227-234A [PMID: 29069107]
  9. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27 [PMID: 25760773]
  10. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Oct;89:531-542 [PMID: 32485289]
  11. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7 [PMID: 16717171]
  12. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2019686 [PMID: 32876685]
  13. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Apr;54(4):410-5 [PMID: 24210897]
  14. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 16;15(9):e200 [PMID: 24041479]
  15. J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:55-64 [PMID: 32799105]
  16. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2020 Oct 12;3(2):e23057 [PMID: 33001834]
  17. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76 [PMID: 25831962]
  18. J Couns Psychol. 2022 Mar;69(2):157-171 [PMID: 34264696]
  19. Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;218(6):334-343 [PMID: 33228822]
  20. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 [PMID: 16204405]
  21. Global Health. 2020 Jul 6;16(1):57 [PMID: 32631403]
  22. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2012 Dec;6(4):121-7 [PMID: 25031113]
  23. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;8(8):647-650 [PMID: 34087112]
  24. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96 [PMID: 6668417]
  25. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 8;9(10):e23716 [PMID: 32991303]
  26. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;71(9):1025-31 [PMID: 25028897]
  27. Global Health. 2021 Jan 25;17(1):15 [PMID: 33494769]
  28. Qual Life Res. 2017 May;26(5):1129-1144 [PMID: 27853963]
  29. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;40(10):914-23 [PMID: 16959018]
  30. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 May;5(5):631-652 [PMID: 33875837]
  31. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 16;23(4):e26994 [PMID: 33822737]
  32. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5 [PMID: 21584907]
  33. Front Psychol. 2020 May 22;11:1168 [PMID: 32574244]
  34. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 10;23(3):e23365 [PMID: 33606657]
  35. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 06;20(6):e199 [PMID: 29875089]
  36. Mindfulness (N Y). 2016 Mar 1;7(2):479-492 [PMID: 27110301]
  37. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;48(8):756-63 [PMID: 24622978]
  38. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Nov 15;14(11):1849-1857 [PMID: 30373688]
  39. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Aug 14;69(32):1049-1057 [PMID: 32790653]
  40. Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):266-74 [PMID: 18388841]
  41. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  42. Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;218(6):326-333 [PMID: 33081860]
  43. Front Psychol. 2012 Apr 17;3:111 [PMID: 22529829]
  44. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 03;11:523 [PMID: 32581891]
  45. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;53(12):1254-1270.e5 [PMID: 25457924]
  46. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 10;4(2):e72 [PMID: 27287964]
  47. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63 [PMID: 18042300]
  48. Lancet. 2007 Apr 14;369(9569):1302-1313 [PMID: 17434406]
  49. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Aug;4(8):634-640 [PMID: 32540024]
  50. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;1(7):569-76 [PMID: 26361316]
  51. BMJ. 2020 Apr 28;369:m1669 [PMID: 32345583]
  52. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 May;48(5):472-80 [PMID: 24317154]
  53. BMJ. 2019 Jan 23;364:l364 [PMID: 30674466]
  54. Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):76 [PMID: 28637479]
  55. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 01;15(3): [PMID: 29494555]
  56. J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:1-7 [PMID: 32405111]
  57. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0119895 [PMID: 25786025]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Australia
COVID-19
Humans
Mobile Applications
Pandemics
Prospective Studies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.04mdp=00well-beingyoungScalepeople3appWhituCOVID-19sevenpandemicqualitative2self-compassionhealthoutcomesgroupweeksmentalmonthsacceptability'Whitu:waysseven days'randomisedcontrolledtrialwaitlist45participantsNewZealandviaversionevaluatedstudy15changesWell-Beingdepressionanxietystresssleepfeedbacksignificantly1361lower-4-0differencesstatisticallysignificantOBJECTIVES:evaluateefficacyapplicationDESIGN:ProspectivecontrolarmPARTICIPANTS:90aged16-30recruitedsocialmediaadvertisingcampaignSETTING:Participants'homesINTERVENTIONS:Developedrefinedprototypesmallernamesuggestscontainsmoduleshelprecogniserateemotionslearnrelaxationmindfulnesspracticegratitudeconnectothers6carephysical7engagegoal-settingcancompletedwithinweekdesiredMAINOUTCOMEMEASURES:PrimaryWHO5-itemIndexShortWarwick-EdinburghMentalSecondaryCentreEpidemiologicalStudiesDepressionGeneralisedAnxietyDisorder7-itemSelfCompassionScale-ShortForm10-itemPerceivedStresssingle-itemSleepQualityuserengagementend-userMobileApplicationRatingonlinesurveyOutcomesbaseline4 weeksprimaryendpoint3 monthsanalysedusinglinearmixedmodelstimegroup-timeinteractionRESULTS:experiencedhigheremotionalMeandifference199622420054427027562883p<0001240201869-7-176002-534-101453030comparedcontrolsGroupremainedSymptomsalsointervention096-2315408042Usabilityhighsubjectiveratings723879respectivelyindicatedindividualculturalCONCLUSIONS:GivenevolvingpsychologicalburdenprovideclinicallyeffectivescalablemeansimprovingresilienceReplicationcurrentfindingsyoungerindividualssettingsplannedTRIALREGISTRATIONNUMBER:AustralianClinicalTrialsRegistryACTRN12620000516987Well-beingsupportpandemic:adolescentcopingskillsmHealthmobileappsadult

Similar Articles

Cited By (12)