Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of lactic acid to reduce microbiological surface contamination on carcases from kangaroos, wild pigs, goats and sheep.

EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP), Claude Lambr��, Jos�� Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Andrew Chesson, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Riccardo Crebelli, David Michael Gott, Konrad Grob, Eugenia Lampi, Gilles Riviere, Inger-Lise Steffensen, Christina Tlustos, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Holger Zorn, Declan Bolton, Sara Bover-Cid, Joop de Knecht, Luisa Peixe, Panagotis Skandamis, Carla Martino, Winy Messens, Alexandra Tard, Alicja Mortensen
Author Information

Abstract

Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of lactic acid to reduce microbiological surface contamination from carcases of wild game (i.e. kangaroos and wild pigs) and small stock (i.e. goats and sheep) before chilling at the slaughterhouse were assessed. Wild pig and kangaroo hide-on carcases may have been chilled before they arrive at the slaughterhouse and are treated after removal of the hides. Lactic acid solutions (2-5%) are applied to the carcases at temperatures of up to 55��C by spraying or misting. The treatment lasts 6-7���s per carcass side. The Panel concluded that: [1] the treatment is of no safety concern, provided that the lactic acid complies with the European Union specifications for food additives; [2] based on the available evidence, it was not possible to conclude on the efficacy of spraying or misting lactic acid on kangaroo, wild pig, goats and sheep carcases; [3] treatment of the above-mentioned carcases with lactic acid may induce reduced susceptibility to the same substance, but this can be minimised; there is currently no evidence that prior exposure of food-borne pathogens to lactic acid leads to the occurrence of resistance levels that compromise antimicrobial therapy; and [4] the release of lactic acid is not of concern for the environment, assuming that wastewaters released by the slaughterhouses are treated on-site, if necessary, to counter the potentially low pH caused by lactic acid, in compliance with local rules.

Keywords

References

  1. J Dairy Sci. 2003 Nov;86(11):3605-10 [PMID: 14672191]
  2. FAO Nutr Meet Rep Ser. 1974;(53A):1-520 [PMID: 4459150]
  3. J Food Prot. 2001 Jan;64(1):58-62 [PMID: 11198442]
  4. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005 Dec;20(6):634-45 [PMID: 16306301]
  5. Meat Sci. 1979 Apr;3(2):143-57 [PMID: 22055269]
  6. Meat Sci. 2005 Apr;69(4):673-80 [PMID: 22063145]
  7. Biochem J. 1967 Oct;105(1):127-36 [PMID: 6060444]
  8. J Nutr. 2005 Jul;135(7):1619-25 [PMID: 15987839]
  9. Medicine (Baltimore). 1998 Mar;77(2):73-82 [PMID: 9556700]
  10. Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30 [PMID: 21603045]
  11. J Food Prot. 2001 Sep;64(9):1439-41 [PMID: 11563525]
  12. Proc Nutr Soc. 1976 May;35(1):27A [PMID: 940818]
  13. EFSA J. 2018 Dec 12;16(12):e05482 [PMID: 32625776]
  14. J Food Prot. 1997 Jun;60(6):619-624 [PMID: 31195555]
  15. Meat Sci. 2004 Apr;66(4):817-21 [PMID: 22061013]
  16. Vet Q. 1985 Oct;7(4):277-82 [PMID: 4071948]
  17. Genes (Basel). 2021 Mar 25;12(4): [PMID: 33806186]
  18. Meat Sci. 2014 Feb;96(2 Pt B):1034-9 [PMID: 23102639]
  19. Clin Biochem. 2008 Sep;41(13):1099-103 [PMID: 18638467]
  20. Meat Sci. 2005 Mar;69(3):401-7 [PMID: 22062977]
  21. J Food Prot. 2005 Oct;68(10):2047-53 [PMID: 16245706]
  22. EFSA J. 2022 May 12;20(5):e07265 [PMID: 35592024]
  23. EFSA J. 2017 Aug 03;15(8):e04970 [PMID: 32625631]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0acidlacticcarcaseswildsafetyefficacygoatssheeptreatmentreducemicrobiologicalsurfacecontaminationgameiekangaroospigssmallstockslaughterhousepigkangaroomaytreatedsprayingmistingconcernevidenceresistanceantimicrobialStudiesevaluatingchillingassessedWildhide-onchilledarriveremovalhidesLacticsolutions2-5%appliedtemperatures55��Clasts6-7���spercarcasssidePanelconcludedthat:[1]providedcompliesEuropeanUnionspecificationsfoodadditives[2]basedavailablepossibleconclude[3]above-mentionedinducereducedsusceptibilitysubstancecanminimisedcurrentlypriorexposurefood-bornepathogensleadsoccurrencelevelscompromisetherapy[4]releaseenvironmentassumingwastewatersreleasedslaughterhouseson-sitenecessarycounterpotentiallylowpHcausedcompliancelocalrulesEvaluationenvironmentalimpacttoxicological

Similar Articles

Cited By