Evaluation of the Presence of Bacterial and Viral Agents in the Semen of Infertile Men: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis Review Study.

Mehrdad Gholami, Mahmood Moosazadeh, Mohammad Reza Haghshenash, Hamed Jafarpour, Tahoora Mousavi
Author Information
  1. Mehrdad Gholami: Department of Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
  2. Mahmood Moosazadeh: Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Center, Non-communicable Diseases Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
  3. Mohammad Reza Haghshenash: Department of Microbiology and Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
  4. Hamed Jafarpour: Faculty of Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
  5. Tahoora Mousavi: Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center (MCBRC), Hemoglobinopathy Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

Abstract

Objectives: Infections in the male genitourinary system with bacterial and viral agents may play a significant role in male infertility. These agents usually infect the urethra, seminal vesicles, prostate, epididymis, vas deferens, and testes retrograde through the reproductive system. A meta-analysis review study was performed to evaluate the presence of bacterial and viral agents in the semen of infertile men and its correlation with infertility.
Methods: Relevant cross-sectional and/or case-control studies were found by an online review of national and international databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google scholar), and suitable studies were selected. A checklist determined the qualities of all studies. Heterogeneity assay among the primary studies was evaluated by Cochran's test and I index (significance level 50%). A statistical analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Stata ver. 14 package (StataCorp, College Station, TX, United States).
Results: Seventy-two studies were included in this meta-analysis. Publication bias was compared with Egger's test, and the impact of each research on overall estimate was evaluated by sensitivity analysis. In 56 studies, the rate of bacterial infections in the semen of infertile men was 12% [95% confidence interval (CI): 10-13]. Also, in 26 case-control studies, the association of infertility in men with bacterial infections was evaluated. The results show that the odds ratio of infertility in men exposed to bacterial infections is 3.31 times higher than that in non-infected men (95% CI: 2.60-4.23). Besides, in 9 studies that examined the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV), herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV1), herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV2), and herpes simplex virus 1-2 (HSV1-2) in infertile men, the frequency of these viruses was 15% (95% CI: 9-21). In 6 case-control studies, the association between human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and HPV and male infertility was evaluated. The chance of male infertility due to exposure to these viruses was 2.24 times higher than those without exposure to these viruses (CI 95%: 1.9-4.52). The results show that the chance of infertility in men exposed to bacteria was significantly higher than that in the uninfected population.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that viral and bacterial infections are a risk factor and could impair male fertility potential. Moreover, our study supports the hypothesis that bacterial and viral infections of the genital tract correlate positively with impairment of sperm quality in the male population.

Keywords

References

  1. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58 [PMID: 12111919]
  2. Int J Fertil Steril. 2019 Jan;12(4):306-309 [PMID: 30291691]
  3. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2021 Jun;48(2):142-149 [PMID: 34078007]
  4. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2487-94 [PMID: 18565516]
  5. J Reprod Immunol. 2013 Nov;100(1):20-9 [PMID: 23668923]
  6. Fertil Steril. 2011 Apr;95(5):1845-8 [PMID: 21167483]
  7. Herpesviridae. 2011 Jun 28;2(1):7 [PMID: 21711549]
  8. Hum Reprod. 2017 Jan;32(1):18-31 [PMID: 27864361]
  9. Eur Urol Focus. 2016 Oct;2(4):383-393 [PMID: 28723470]
  10. Urology. 2018 Mar;113:52-58 [PMID: 29287977]
  11. Fertil Steril. 1997 Jun;67(6):1152-5 [PMID: 9176459]
  12. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018 Jul;16(7):469-474 [PMID: 30234189]
  13. Nephrourol Mon. 2014 Nov 11;6(6):e22390 [PMID: 25738116]
  14. Urology. 2017 Feb;100:97-102 [PMID: 27871827]
  15. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014 May;12(5):327-34 [PMID: 25031577]
  16. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008 Apr 01;2(2):116-9 [PMID: 19738335]
  17. Int J STD AIDS. 2009 Jun;20(6):387-90 [PMID: 19451322]
  18. Andrologia. 2018 Dec;50(11):e13140 [PMID: 30569651]
  19. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018 Jul;16(7):443-446 [PMID: 30234184]
  20. Arch Razi Inst. 2021 Mar;76(1):41-49 [PMID: 33818956]
  21. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014 Feb;12(2):151-4 [PMID: 24799874]
  22. J Biomed Res. 2013 Jan;27(1):56-61 [PMID: 23554795]
  23. World J Urol. 2012 Feb;30(1):23-30 [PMID: 21748371]
  24. World J Urol. 2013 Aug;31(4):717-23 [PMID: 23857546]
  25. Andrologia. 2018 Jan 1;: [PMID: 29292525]
  26. Hum Reprod. 2002 May;17(5):1281-7 [PMID: 11980752]
  27. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017 Dec;44(4):207-213 [PMID: 29376018]
  28. Hum Reprod Update. 2018 Jul 1;24(4):416-441 [PMID: 29648649]
  29. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013 Nov;11(11):925-32 [PMID: 24639718]
  30. Pak J Biol Sci. 2007 Nov 1;10(21):3960-3 [PMID: 19090264]
  31. Fertil Steril. 2012 May;97(5):1050-5 [PMID: 22341372]
  32. Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Dec;11(12):672-87 [PMID: 25330794]
  33. Infection. 2018 Feb;46(1):31-38 [PMID: 29124647]
  34. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 2000 Mar-Apr;(2):106-10 [PMID: 10808590]
  35. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2016;2016:2614692 [PMID: 26880908]
  36. Andrologia. 2018 Mar;50(2): [PMID: 28736810]
  37. Fertil Steril. 2007 May;87(5):1087-97 [PMID: 17433312]
  38. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2015;53(3):201-17 [PMID: 26306512]
  39. Int J STD AIDS. 2004 Nov;15(11):740-3 [PMID: 15537460]
  40. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 May 12;114(19):339-346 [PMID: 28597829]
  41. Asian J Androl. 2018 Sep-Oct;20(5):493-497 [PMID: 29623908]
  42. J Androl. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):114-20 [PMID: 19779210]
  43. Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(3):802-6 [PMID: 19100537]
  44. Andrologia. 2003 Oct;35(5):283-7 [PMID: 14535856]
  45. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jan;91(1):67-82 [PMID: 18243180]
  46. World J Mens Health. 2019 May;37(2):128-137 [PMID: 30644236]
  47. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2017 Jun;15(6):331-344 [PMID: 29177237]
  48. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Oct 04;29:272 [PMID: 26793663]
  49. J Reprod Infertil. 2020 Apr-Jun;21(2):124-129 [PMID: 32500015]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studiesinfertilitybacterialmenmaleinfectionsviralevaluatedvirusagentsmeta-analysissemeninfertilecase-controlhigher2herpessimplexvirusessystemreviewstudySciencetestanalysisCIassociationresultsshowexposedtimes95%CI:humanHPV1chanceexposurebacteriapopulationObjectives:InfectionsgenitourinarymayplaysignificantroleusuallyinfecturethraseminalvesiclesprostateepididymisvasdeferenstestesretrogradereproductiveperformedevaluatepresencecorrelationMethods:Relevantcross-sectionaland/orfoundonlinenationalinternationaldatabasesWebPubMedScopusDirectGooglescholarsuitableselectedchecklistdeterminedqualitiesHeterogeneityassayamongprimaryCochran'sindexsignificancelevel50%statisticalconductedusingComprehensiveStataver14packageStataCorpCollegeStationTXUnitedStatesResults:Seventy-twoincludedPublicationbiascomparedEgger'simpactresearchoverallestimatesensitivity56rate12%[95%confidenceinterval:10-13]Also26oddsratio331non-infected60-423Besides9examinedprevalencepapillomavirusHSV1HSV21-2HSV1-2frequency15%9-216cytomegalovirusHCMVCytomegalovirusCMVdue24without95%:9-452significantlyuninfectedConclusion:showedriskfactorimpairfertilitypotentialMoreoversupportshypothesisgenitaltractcorrelatepositivelyimpairmentspermqualityEvaluationPresenceBacterialViralAgentsSemenInfertileMen:SystematicMeta-AnalysisReviewStudyIraninfection

Similar Articles

Cited By